kentucky1_

kentucky1_ — CS2 Stats

CA76561199159247227[U:1:1198981499]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

288Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
713Hours in CS74Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches119——
Win rate50%——
K/D1.00——
Headshot %43%——

Measured 12 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,051), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate44.7%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy14.1%12.2%11.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.180.980.99above
Match win rate50.1%43.3%43.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkentucky1_FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning54
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–36–13Last 10051%Win rateWLLTWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +0ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.4
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time570ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–0 · train, 8 Oct →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 24 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · anubis, 9 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · train, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
2–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 72nukeWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA7240–3256%-0.01
nukeD155–1033%-0.01
cache—42–250%0.02
anubis—42–250%-0.02
train—21–150%0.07
dust2—10–10%-0.04
vertigo—10–10%0.01
ancient—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,795Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
988Matches
50.1%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 3 players
44.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
1,394MVPs
394Hours (in match)
662Bombs planted
170Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,708dust2
647inferno
406nuke
181vertigo
70train
27office
21safehouse
17lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

9Matches
22%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
64.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage520%0.7111.0
Dust2425%0.9514.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
568msReaction time
22.4%T opening success
52.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
4.44HE damage / grenade
14.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.351% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–4-0.0710%10 Oct →
cache10–130.0020%10 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0219%10 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0420%10 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0629%10 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0511%10 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0124%9 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0218%9 Oct →
cache13–100.0615%9 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0210%9 Oct →
nuke6–130.0216%8 Oct →
nuke10–130.1215%8 Oct →
train4–130.0118%8 Oct →
train13–00.1320%8 Oct →
mirage13–90.0221%8 Oct →
mirage13–50.089%8 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.048%8 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0717%7 Oct →
anubis13–90.0411%7 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0510%7 Oct →
mirage13–80.0119%7 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0117%7 Oct →
vertigo7–130.0132%6 Oct →
mirage13–60.0414%6 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0910%6 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0218%6 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0011%6 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.048%6 Oct →
mirage13–60.0414%6 Oct →
ancient13–80.0423%5 Oct →
nuke12–120.0418%5 Oct →
nuke8–130.0122%3 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0018%3 Oct →
cache13–40.0014%3 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0221%3 Oct →
mirage13–70.1011%2 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.045%2 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.065%2 Oct →
nuke9–3-0.0121%2 Oct →
mirage11–10.0113%2 Oct →
mirage12–120.0210%1 Oct →
mirage13–100.0313%1 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0616%1 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0417%30 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0115%29 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0413%29 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0823%29 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.008%28 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0210%28 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0218%27 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.019%27 Sept →
mirage9–130.0224%27 Sept →
mirage6–130.0215%27 Sept →
mirage13–90.0314%27 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.057%26 Sept →
mirage13–80.0410%26 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.018%26 Sept →
mirage12–120.0421%26 Sept →
mirage6–130.0413%26 Sept →
mirage13–30.0423%26 Sept →
mirage13–00.026%26 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.018%26 Sept →
mirage7–130.0218%25 Sept →
mirage12–120.0515%25 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0015%25 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0217%25 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0618%25 Sept →
mirage2–130.0519%25 Sept →
mirage11–130.0221%25 Sept →
mirage13–50.0122%25 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0512%25 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0514%25 Sept →
mirage13–100.0713%24 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.059%24 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0123%24 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0711%24 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0223%24 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0417%24 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0511%24 Sept →
mirage13–50.0135%24 Sept →
mirage13–30.0823%23 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0419%23 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0514%23 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0414%23 Sept →
mirage13–60.0235%23 Sept →
mirage13–40.0615%23 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0328%22 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.027%22 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0711%22 Sept →
mirage13–60.0318%22 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0728%21 Sept →
mirage13–80.0218%21 Sept →
cache4–130.024%19 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0118%19 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0415%19 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0319%19 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0632%18 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0417%18 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0124%16 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0317%16 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.