YobeN

YobeN — CS2 Stats

SE76561198100778383[U:1:140512655]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,765Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,815Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,765 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 22 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,694 -1,217 3 Feb29 Jun · 35 days played
19,12822,551peak 22,5513 Feb29 Jun
22,551Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2026-01-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 14 Sep 2026 and 21 Sep 2026.

Measured 14 Sep 202621 Sep 2026; previous 8 Sep 2026 → 14 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.6%43.8%44.8%3.2% short
Shot accuracy12.8%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.851.021.040.18 short
Match win rate39.2%44.7%45.2%6.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGYobeNFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning61
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44506Last 10044%Win rateWLTWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim4.4
Utility6.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 59% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning6.1
Utility6.5
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time621ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · overpass, 22 Jan
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · ancient, 12 May
438msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · mirage, 22 Jan
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 22 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8ancientWeakest map · 33% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB31161552%-0.02
ancientD2481633%-0.02
dust2D124833%-0.01
overpassA106460%-0.01
mirageC83538%-0.03
anubisA85363%0.01
cache31233%-0.02
nuke31233%-0.06
eldorado1010%-0.19

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,848Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
3,849Matches
39.2%Match win rate
41.6%Headshot %
12.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
6,099MVPs
1,730Hours (in match)
2,617Bombs planted
722Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,606
FAMAS2,894
MAC-101,916
MP91,816
AWP1,126

Lifetime map wins

11,949inferno
3,536dust2
1,764nuke
518vertigo
480train
161dust
96cbble
77aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

24Matches
54%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno757%0.7511.6
Ancient650%0.8513.3
Mirage450%0.9014.0
Anubis367%0.9014.0
Dust2250%0.8613.5
Vertigo10%1.1416.0
Nuke1100%1.0019.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
68.0%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
628msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
56.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
11.76HE damage / grenade
10.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.1849% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0514%7 Sept
inferno7–130.0120%7 Sept
ancient15–150.0010%30 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0118%30 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0426%29 Aug
inferno13–50.018%27 Aug
cache7–13-0.036%5 Aug
anubis13–60.0714%4 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0413%4 Aug
inferno4–9-0.188%4 Aug
eldorado4–9-0.1911%4 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0313%29 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0316%18 Jun
anubis11–130.0215%16 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0128%16 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0012%15 Jun
ancient13–100.0618%15 Jun
dust213–7-0.0114%14 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0515%14 Jun
ancient2–13-0.127%14 Jun
nuke7–13-0.1215%14 Jun
ancient9–13-0.039%8 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0718%8 Jun
ancient13–30.0123%4 Jun
overpass15–15-0.0312%31 May
mirage13–6-0.0120%31 May
cache9–13-0.0325%23 May
ancient13–4-0.0410%23 May
overpass13–90.0220%12 May
ancient13–90.0429%12 May
ancient8–13-0.0210%6 May
ancient2–130.0511%6 May
ancient11–13-0.0820%4 May
mirage1–13-0.0110%4 May
dust25–130.0420%4 May
ancient9–13-0.059%3 May
cache13–100.0113%3 May
anubis13–7-0.0310%20 Apr
inferno13–100.0625%20 Apr
overpass16–120.017%13 Apr
inferno10–130.0114%12 Apr
anubis13–70.037%12 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0523%8 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0518%6 Apr
anubis13–110.0911%6 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0022%5 Apr
dust26–13-0.0120%5 Apr
ancient13–80.006%3 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0014%3 Apr
ancient16–120.0114%1 Apr
overpass8–13-0.047%1 Apr
inferno11–130.0518%22 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0417%22 Mar
inferno14–16-0.0314%18 Mar
anubis13–90.0118%18 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0913%17 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0619%10 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0612%9 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0617%2 Mar
ancient10–13-0.055%2 Mar
inferno13–60.0426%1 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0420%27 Feb
ancient8–130.0214%22 Feb
dust28–13-0.0216%22 Feb
overpass13–3-0.0517%21 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0016%21 Feb
ancient7–13-0.075%21 Feb
inferno16–14-0.0511%14 Feb
dust213–110.0320%14 Feb
dust215–15-0.0022%12 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0417%10 Feb
inferno13–90.0221%10 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0217%9 Feb
dust27–13-0.0115%9 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0419%7 Feb
dust22–13-0.0612%5 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0713%5 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0510%5 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0413%4 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0614%4 Feb
ancient13–80.0120%3 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0614%3 Feb
overpass13–5-0.0514%3 Feb
dust26–13-0.0710%2 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0521%29 Jan
dust213–7-0.0018%28 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0113%28 Jan
dust22–00.000%28 Jan
overpass15–15-0.0112%26 Jan
mirage8–13-0.084%26 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0515%25 Jan
overpass13–90.0319%25 Jan
inferno7–130.005%24 Jan
ancient13–20.089%24 Jan
anubis8–13-0.045%24 Jan
dust211–13-0.0517%24 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0113%24 Jan
inferno13–90.0228%22 Jan
overpass13–70.1219%22 Jan
mirage13–10.065%22 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →