Surnas

Surnas — CS2 Stats

UM76561198097154403[U:1:136888675]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,416Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,716Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating15,622Purple band · top ~25.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11039 of 17650 tracked
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate34.4%48.1%13.6% short
Shot accuracy10.7%12.9%2.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.011.080.07 short
Match win rate43.9%46.5%2.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSurnasPREMIER15,622 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning49
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48475Last 10048%Win rateTWLLTWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression6.0
Utility5.1
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 652ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning4.9
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time655ms+48ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 655ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–7
131Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 65% over 20nukeWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2013765%0.01
cacheB178947%0.00
mirageS1711665%0.02
anubisC145936%0.01
dust2C146843%-0.00
nukeD1331023%-0.01
infernoC52340%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,459Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
4,125Matches
43.9%Match win rate
34.4%Headshot %
10.7%Shot accuracy
8,454MVPs
1,716Hours (in match)
5,586Bombs planted
952Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

17,115dust2
3,212inferno
3,188nuke
972vertigo
597train
437office
120cbble
24aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

87Matches
43%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
81.9ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2446%0.9915.3
Dust22020%1.0316.4
Ancient1471%1.0616.1
Nuke1242%0.8413.6
Inferno540%0.9815.4
Anubis560%1.1719.8
Overpass450%0.9413.8
Vertigo20%0.6110.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
652msReaction time
22.0%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
7.92HE damage / grenade
8.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.8492% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis15–150.0310%23 Aug
cache16–130.045%23 Aug
mirage13–160.0112%23 Aug
cache9–13-0.0515%16 Aug
dust212–12-0.0120%16 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0522%16 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0212%16 Aug
ancient13–70.0120%15 Aug
anubis3–130.0211%15 Aug
mirage13–6-0.017%8 Aug
dust20–6-0.0940%8 Aug
ancient13–9-0.018%4 Aug
cache16–140.0218%4 Aug
mirage7–130.0517%2 Aug
dust213–20.0922%2 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0111%2 Aug
anubis10–130.0214%2 Aug
nuke8–130.0927%2 Aug
dust21–13-0.1013%2 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0312%2 Aug
cache12–12-0.0419%1 Aug
dust213–10-0.0111%1 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0715%1 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0914%1 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0117%1 Aug
ancient13–7-0.014%28 Jul
cache9–130.0219%28 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0221%28 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0318%28 Jul
nuke13–100.0415%26 Jul
ancient13–60.0328%26 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0228%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.026%26 Jul
cache13–11-0.0223%26 Jul
dust216–140.0215%26 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0915%26 Jul
mirage15–150.018%25 Jul
ancient10–13-0.007%25 Jul
anubis13–60.099%24 Jul
cache13–10.0613%22 Jul
anubis13–160.0513%18 Jul
mirage13–10.1030%18 Jul
cache7–13-0.0413%18 Jul
mirage13–110.0517%17 Jul
nuke14–160.0012%16 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0412%16 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0211%16 Jul
ancient6–130.0712%14 Jul
cache13–90.0317%14 Jul
nuke13–70.0011%14 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0211%14 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0213%13 Jul
dust26–13-0.087%13 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0118%13 Jul
anubis13–70.0114%13 Jul
dust27–130.0213%13 Jul
cache1–13-0.0811%13 Jul
cache13–80.1128%12 Jul
ancient16–120.1118%12 Jul
nuke12–16-0.017%12 Jul
cache8–13-0.0820%12 Jul
mirage11–130.0410%12 Jul
dust213–40.0310%12 Jul
dust213–70.1215%12 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0213%12 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0113%12 Jul
ancient13–50.0716%12 Jul
cache15–15-0.0213%12 Jul
dust29–13-0.0724%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0316%11 Jul
cache6–13-0.0211%11 Jul
ancient4–13-0.039%11 Jul
cache13–100.0717%11 Jul
ancient11–13-0.066%11 Jul
anubis6–130.0228%11 Jul
cache13–5-0.0319%11 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0414%10 Jul
inferno6–130.0220%10 Jul
mirage13–110.0111%10 Jul
dust210–13-0.028%9 Jul
cache9–130.079%9 Jul
nuke5–130.0223%9 Jul
inferno13–50.0017%9 Jul
ancient13–50.0919%9 Jul
nuke11–130.0614%9 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0722%5 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0822%5 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0316%4 Jul
anubis13–70.0414%4 Jul
dust216–140.0012%4 Jul
ancient13–90.0318%30 Jun
inferno13–100.0419%28 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0512%28 Jun
mirage13–110.1022%27 Jun
ancient9–130.029%27 Jun
dust211–130.0613%27 Jun
mirage13–70.0113%26 Jun
ancient13–90.0721%26 Jun
mirage13–70.0321%22 Jun
anubis13–40.0413%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →