SirRaffley

SirRaffley — CS2 Stats

DE76561198093576205[U:1:133310477]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,756Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,398Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,777 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,777 → 1,777
+2Tracked matches · now 1,756
+1.8ppWin rate · 44.8% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,481 +2,337 2 Jan – 27 May · 11 days played
22,73325,645peak 25,6452 Jan27 May
25,645Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,777Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-01-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,777
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 224 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,327), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate51.3%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy13.9%13.3%13.8%meets
Kill/death ratio0.941.071.090.15 short
Match win rate40.5%46.9%48.4%7.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSirRaffleyFACEITLevel 9 · 1,777 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,777csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning44
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateWWLWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility4.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time609ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 6–13 · train, 3 Jan →
80%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · office, 21 Jan →
406msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · ancient, 27 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 20 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 88% over 8overpassWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB209–1145%-0.03
ancientB1910–953%-0.03
nukeS1711–665%-0.01
overpassD93–633%-0.04
dust2S87–188%0.00
anubisB84–450%0.01
vertigoD62–433%-0.04
mirage—42–250%-0.04
cache—30–30%-0.04
train—31–233%0.02
office—21–150%0.03
poseidon—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

129,157Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
6,484Matches
40.5%Match win rate
51.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
13,627MVPs
2,925Hours (in match)
5,576Bombs planted
1,582Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4750,270
AWP5,580
P2502,586
UMP-452,115
Knife2,112
MP91,787

Lifetime map wins

6,698inferno
5,324dust2
1,987nuke
1,711vertigo
1,660cbble
1,314train
300office
255safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

629Matches
55%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
59.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient6967%0.8312.4
Inferno4262%0.7310.9
Nuke2560%0.8812.0
Anubis2255%1.0214.2
Overpass2264%0.8613.1
Mirage2060%0.9312.8
Vertigo1553%0.7712.5
Dust21338%0.619.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
610msReaction time
19.0%T opening success
42.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.03HE damage / grenade
4.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.0341% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–70.0120%29 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0040%29 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0511%13 Sept →
nuke13–110.0416%13 Sept →
dust28–130.0029%29 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.099%29 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0227%29 Aug →
ancient13–100.0329%29 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0526%29 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.060%27 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0214%27 Aug →
nuke13–50.0514%27 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0614%26 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0121%14 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0325%14 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0225%14 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0840%14 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0523%5 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0933%5 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0820%30 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0214%27 May →
ancient13–7-0.0713%27 May →
inferno16–13-0.0412%19 May →
nuke16–14-0.0228%19 May →
overpass13–11-0.0414%19 May →
ancient4–13-0.0919%19 May →
inferno10–13-0.108%19 May →
dust213–90.0227%8 May →
ancient4–13-0.1212%8 May →
nuke13–10-0.0114%27 Apr →
nuke13–40.0022%25 Apr →
inferno12–12-0.0724%21 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0624%14 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0614%12 Apr →
ancient16–13-0.0822%12 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0220%12 Apr →
nuke8–130.0016%12 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0118%12 Apr →
inferno16–130.0220%5 Apr →
ancient13–40.0729%4 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0522%3 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0822%31 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0421%31 Mar →
dust213–2-0.0037%31 Mar →
ancient3–13-0.0612%31 Mar →
anubis13–110.0443%31 Mar →
inferno14–16-0.0222%15 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0323%15 Mar →
overpass13–9-0.0324%4 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.0315%4 Mar →
ancient5–130.0011%4 Mar →
nuke13–3-0.0117%4 Mar →
vertigo12–120.0016%11 Feb →
vertigo5–130.0226%11 Feb →
overpass16–14-0.0614%23 Jan →
anubis13–80.0333%23 Jan →
poseidon9–50.028%23 Jan →
office13–40.0280%21 Jan →
office9–130.0322%21 Jan →
vertigo9–13-0.0420%20 Jan →
nuke13–9-0.0131%20 Jan →
ancient13–60.0317%20 Jan →
dust213–10.0310%20 Jan →
anubis13–30.0942%20 Jan →
overpass6–9-0.0717%20 Jan →
inferno9–7-0.0814%20 Jan →
anubis6–5-0.0242%20 Jan →
inferno13–50.0424%20 Jan →
dust28–10.0060%20 Jan →
inferno5–90.0527%20 Jan →
vertigo2–9-0.2133%20 Jan →
dust213–11-0.0416%19 Jan →
ancient8–130.0121%19 Jan →
nuke13–60.0118%19 Jan →
mirage13–9-0.0124%19 Jan →
ancient4–13-0.0017%19 Jan →
ancient13–7-0.0421%19 Jan →
overpass4–13-0.0614%19 Jan →
ancient16–13-0.0219%15 Jan →
ancient13–40.0323%15 Jan →
ancient9–13-0.0514%15 Jan →
overpass7–130.0119%14 Jan →
overpass10–13-0.0622%4 Jan →
dust213–7-0.0011%4 Jan →
inferno13–11-0.0224%4 Jan →
ancient13–110.0324%4 Jan →
nuke11–13-0.0613%4 Jan →
inferno10–130.0317%4 Jan →
nuke13–80.0628%4 Jan →
train6–130.1014%3 Jan →
train13–60.0117%3 Jan →
overpass12–16-0.0511%3 Jan →
dust213–70.0116%3 Jan →
inferno6–13-0.0521%3 Jan →
inferno15–15-0.0325%3 Jan →
train2–13-0.0621%2 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.0415%2 Jan →
overpass7–13-0.0426%2 Jan →
nuke13–7-0.0316%2 Jan →
inferno16–130.0213%2 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.