Dake

Dake — CS2 Stats

DE76561198050380174[U:1:90114446]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,161Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,271Top 10% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10734 of 247886 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,263 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+575Premier CS Rating · 25,696 → 26,271

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,271 +1,560 3 Aug – 1 Oct · 23 days played
24,71127,021peak 27,0213 Aug1 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,263 +0 28 Aug – 16 Sept · 4 observations
2,2632,263peak 2,26328 Aug16 Sept
27,171Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,263Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,263
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 237 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 750 below peak (27,021)
  • -313 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,729 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDakeFACEITLevel 10 · 2,263 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,271 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,263csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning60
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–45–6Last 10049%Win rateWWLLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −29ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility3.4
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.0
Utility3.4
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time515ms−99ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 30 Aug →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 23 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · inferno, 30 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 11 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB199–1047%-0.01
cacheB189–950%-0.01
ancientC135–838%-0.05
nukeA127–558%-0.01
vertigoS96–367%0.04
anubisD72–529%-0.00
dust2S54–180%0.01
mirage—41–325%-0.00
fachwerk—32–167%-0.02
train—31–233%-0.02
debris—20–20%-0.03
italy—20–20%0.01
shelter—22–0100%0.00
poseidon—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,260Matches
52%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
71.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient16749%0.9214.4
Inferno10854%0.9814.5
Nuke5855%0.9613.3
Anubis5551%0.8314.6
Overpass4360%0.9513.3
Dust23847%0.8712.7
Vertigo2955%1.0214.9
Mirage2050%0.7912.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
534msReaction time
52.7%T opening success
39.0%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
7.50HE damage / grenade
4.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3915 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.9761% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–90.0530%1 Oct →
dust213–70.0215%1 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0431%30 Sept →
mirage5–130.0524%30 Sept →
dust25–130.0327%30 Sept →
cache10–130.0128%30 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0221%29 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0529%29 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0529%27 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0720%27 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0023%27 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.1129%27 Sept →
ancient12–120.0121%27 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0827%27 Sept →
anubis10–130.0324%25 Sept →
cache0–4-0.0450%25 Sept →
inferno5–80.0521%25 Sept →
cache13–60.0257%23 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0016%23 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0817%23 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0223%23 Sept →
debris8–8-0.1028%21 Sept →
ancient13–80.0111%20 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.0116%20 Sept →
inferno4–130.0215%20 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.115%19 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0424%18 Sept →
italy6–130.000%17 Sept →
italy6–130.0118%17 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0014%17 Sept →
cache4–13-0.1213%16 Sept →
anubis13–30.0022%16 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0726%16 Sept →
nuke9–40.0129%16 Sept →
nuke11–130.0424%13 Sept →
nuke13–110.0920%13 Sept →
fachwerk6–2-0.0913%12 Sept →
dust213–40.0519%12 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0332%12 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.1210%7 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0029%6 Sept →
inferno13–90.0122%2 Sept →
cache4–130.0230%31 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.1016%31 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.096%30 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0125%30 Aug →
debris8–80.0526%30 Aug →
inferno9–70.0213%30 Aug →
nuke9–7-0.0221%30 Aug →
poseidon9–50.0725%30 Aug →
vertigo9–30.2020%30 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0031%27 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0622%26 Aug →
anubis11–130.0622%24 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0116%24 Aug →
inferno15–150.0416%24 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0429%23 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0119%21 Aug →
train13–8-0.0024%17 Aug →
train7–13-0.0321%17 Aug →
train3–13-0.0417%17 Aug →
cache10–130.0236%16 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0410%16 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.0716%16 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0813%16 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.1327%14 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0124%14 Aug →
nuke13–80.0725%11 Aug →
ancient13–100.0322%11 Aug →
nuke13–00.0419%11 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0328%9 Aug →
inferno13–70.0820%9 Aug →
inferno10–130.0321%9 Aug →
vertigo13–110.0114%8 Aug →
vertigo9–60.1133%8 Aug →
nuke2–9-0.1022%8 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0027%7 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0527%7 Aug →
mirage13–110.0522%7 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0321%7 Aug →
cache13–80.0824%7 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0320%6 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0526%4 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0714%4 Aug →
shelter13–90.0030%4 Aug →
fachwerk13–5-0.0123%4 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0317%3 Aug →
inferno13–70.0329%3 Aug →
cache13–80.0018%3 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0933%3 Aug →
mirage0–130.0126%3 Aug →
fachwerk9–130.0330%2 Aug →
vertigo6–13-0.0021%2 Aug →
vertigo12–120.0912%2 Aug →
shelter13–5-0.0027%2 Aug →
inferno2–12-0.0514%25 Jul →
cache11–130.0645%23 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0016%21 Jul →
cache16–13-0.0218%19 Jul →
cache13–80.0417%19 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.