n0xz

n0xz — CS2 Stats

DE76561198030360998[U:1:70095270]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,408Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,959Top 10% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12918 of 247892 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,324 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−330Premier CS Rating · 26,289 → 25,959

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,959 +1,849 3 Aug – 1 Oct · 28 days played
23,73427,360peak 27,3603 Aug1 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,324 +0 3 Sept – 26 Sept · 2 observations
2,3242,324peak 2,3243 Sept26 Sept
27,360Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,324Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-08-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,324
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 176 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,401 below peak (27,360)
  • -973 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,041 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGn0xzFACEITLevel 10 · 2,324 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,959 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,324csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning42
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateLLLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.7
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.2
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time536ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy25.4%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 10–3 · mirage, 22 Aug →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 1 Oct →
297msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · mirage, 23 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L3Current streak
14–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 12infernoWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2212–1055%0.01
infernoC166–1038%-0.01
cacheB136–746%0.01
anubisA127–558%-0.01
ancientS128–467%0.02
dust2A117–464%0.01
vertigoB105–550%-0.00
nuke—32–167%-0.01
debris—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,495Matches
51%Win rate
12.36Avg K/D
79.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18850%1.0815.7
Ancient16155%1.1116.1
Anubis15049%1.1416.6
Dust29652%1.0515.2
Inferno7547%1.0516.4
Vertigo5850%1.1317.1
Nuke2642%0.9914.7
Overpass2157%1.2014.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
557msReaction time
42.2%T opening success
32.7%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
8.17HE damage / grenade
13.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4598 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.6526% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–13-0.0756%1 Oct →
cache7–130.0429%30 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0324%30 Sept →
vertigo13–7-0.0131%29 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0314%29 Sept →
anubis13–20.0229%29 Sept →
nuke13–80.0121%28 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.0914%27 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0725%25 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0125%24 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0822%24 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0221%20 Sept →
vertigo5–90.0042%20 Sept →
inferno8–80.0632%20 Sept →
inferno8–80.0346%20 Sept →
vertigo0–13-0.040%20 Sept →
vertigo1–13-0.0343%19 Sept →
cache7–4-0.0715%19 Sept →
dust213–160.0214%19 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.220%19 Sept →
anubis13–90.0127%19 Sept →
anubis13–10.0251%19 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0311%17 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0829%16 Sept →
vertigo3–9-0.0730%16 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0533%16 Sept →
anubis13–90.0028%16 Sept →
inferno9–20.0123%15 Sept →
inferno9–50.1140%15 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.057%15 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0424%15 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0610%15 Sept →
ancient2–6-0.0720%15 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0239%14 Sept →
dust216–140.0128%14 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0911%5 Sept →
dust213–90.0126%5 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.1023%29 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0229%29 Aug →
nuke13–90.0321%29 Aug →
ancient13–100.0221%29 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0319%29 Aug →
vertigo13–110.0522%28 Aug →
anubis13–110.0623%28 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0319%26 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0012%23 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0417%23 Aug →
cache13–110.0619%22 Aug →
mirage10–30.1512%22 Aug →
ancient13–110.0520%22 Aug →
mirage11–130.0430%22 Aug →
ancient13–50.0621%22 Aug →
mirage13–50.0124%22 Aug →
ancient13–90.0224%22 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0326%22 Aug →
dust213–100.0625%21 Aug →
dust213–110.0620%21 Aug →
vertigo13–110.0019%21 Aug →
vertigo13–80.0625%21 Aug →
anubis13–2-0.0341%21 Aug →
inferno26–280.0019%20 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0324%20 Aug →
ancient13–90.0617%20 Aug →
mirage13–30.0231%20 Aug →
dust211–130.0033%20 Aug →
cache10–130.0129%20 Aug →
dust213–80.0526%20 Aug →
mirage16–130.0525%15 Aug →
cache14–160.0221%15 Aug →
inferno13–50.0432%14 Aug →
mirage13–110.0123%14 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0224%14 Aug →
mirage7–130.1019%14 Aug →
inferno13–110.0123%14 Aug →
dust210–130.0437%14 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0121%14 Aug →
inferno13–110.0140%13 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0326%13 Aug →
mirage13–70.0320%13 Aug →
mirage10–130.0222%12 Aug →
mirage7–130.0021%12 Aug →
cache13–70.0316%12 Aug →
cache15–150.0121%10 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0515%9 Aug →
ancient13–40.1118%9 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0215%7 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0326%7 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0326%7 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0024%7 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0020%7 Aug →
cache13–40.0519%6 Aug →
anubis9–130.0319%6 Aug →
ancient13–30.0524%6 Aug →
mirage13–60.1517%6 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.056%5 Aug →
anubis13–70.0115%5 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.029%5 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0124%3 Aug →
mirage13–80.0320%3 Aug →
debris9–40.0214%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.