RUXIY👣 — CS2 Stats

LV76561198086169219[U:1:125903491]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,001Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,998Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist

Premier CS Rating25,209Top 10% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19939 of 261506 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,931 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,209 +516 4 Sept – 13 Nov · 26 days played

Faceit ELO: 1,931 +0 4 Sept – 20 Sept · 3 observations

26,970Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,931Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

37Days played since 2026-09-04

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,931
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 70 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04
Level 8 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

1,512 below peak (26,721)
-1,512 over 30 days · declining
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,791 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	46.5%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	12.9%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.23	1.09
Match win rate	48.9%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning51

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–45–9Last 10046%Win rateWLWLLLLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −5.0pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

3–6–1 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

6–13–1 · 30% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 526ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.7

Utility6.0

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels0.9

Clutch6.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning5.1

Utility6.0

Mechanics3.7

Opening Duels1.5

Win Impact1.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time532ms+4ms

first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms

Headshot accuracy25.0%+2.0%

first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 22 Oct →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 18 Oct →

336msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · office, 10 Nov →

13–0Biggest win · office, 1 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
office	C	31	11–20	35%	0.03
dust2	B	13	6–7	46%	0.00
cache	A	12	7–5	58%	0.04
inferno	D	10	3–7	30%	0.04
anubis	D	10	2–8	20%	-0.01
mirage	S	10	8–2	80%	0.03
ancient	—	4	2–2	50%	0.05
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.00
nuke	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.01
debris	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.04
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

218,153Lifetime kills

1.23K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players

9,929Matches

48.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

46.5%Headshot %

12.9%Shot accuracy

24,869MVPs

3,998Hours (in match)

9,986Bombs planted

3,055Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4767,567

M4A4 / M4A1-S40,465

P2000 / USP-S14,384

AWP11,277

Glock-1810,692

Desert Eagle9,052

Molotov8,239

MP95,546

P2505,251

MAC-104,506

Lifetime map wins

22,515dust2

12,811inferno

4,311nuke

1,792vertigo

1,740cbble

1,439office

1,370train

746italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

682Matches

55%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

88.6ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win

32%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	23	48%	1.21	18.8
Dust2	16	75%	1.46	16.9
Inferno	13	77%	1.60	21.5
Nuke	7	86%	1.18	16.1
Anubis	6	33%	1.25	18.3
Overpass	6	67%	1.28	17.0
Cache	2	100%	1.14	17.0
Ancient	1	100%	1.19	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy

31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.3%Spray accuracy

66.7%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

534msReaction time

24.2%T opening success

42.1%CT opening success

0.40Enemies flashed / flash

3.9%Flash assists

9.05HE damage / grenade

13.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4011 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.1909% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
train	13–5	0.10	28%	13 Nov →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	26%	13 Nov →
overpass	13–10	-0.05	15%	12 Nov →
inferno	10–13	0.04	13%	12 Nov →
office	3–13	-0.09	11%	10 Nov →
office	6–13	0.05	22%	10 Nov →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	26%	10 Nov →
cache	13–8	-0.01	20%	10 Nov →
office	5–11	-0.04	31%	5 Nov →
office	12–12	0.06	16%	5 Nov →
office	13–8	0.05	15%	5 Nov →
office	3–13	-0.08	25%	4 Nov →
office	13–8	0.01	20%	4 Nov →
office	4–13	-0.07	46%	3 Nov →
office	11–13	0.04	25%	3 Nov →
office	9–13	-0.03	28%	3 Nov →
office	10–13	0.04	22%	3 Nov →
office	8–13	-0.00	32%	3 Nov →
inferno	7–9	0.02	19%	1 Nov →
nuke	9–6	0.03	26%	1 Nov →
office	10–13	0.09	24%	1 Nov →
office	13–0	0.11	30%	1 Nov →
office	13–2	0.03	38%	1 Nov →
office	13–11	0.06	20%	31 Oct →
office	12–12	0.06	30%	31 Oct →
debris	9–3	0.04	10%	31 Oct →
eldorado	9–7	0.05	16%	31 Oct →
office	3–13	0.01	28%	31 Oct →
office	12–12	0.00	26%	31 Oct →
inferno	10–13	0.05	27%	31 Oct →
office	13–11	0.03	34%	31 Oct →
office	12–12	0.04	32%	29 Oct →
office	10–13	0.12	44%	29 Oct →
office	13–8	0.03	32%	29 Oct →
cache	13–4	0.10	39%	25 Oct →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	25%	25 Oct →
anubis	11–13	0.02	13%	24 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	19%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–10	0.05	17%	23 Oct →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	14%	23 Oct →
anubis	7–13	0.04	18%	22 Oct →
mirage	13–10	0.17	19%	22 Oct →
anubis	6–13	-0.08	31%	21 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.00	15%	21 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.03	50%	18 Oct →
office	9–13	-0.06	36%	18 Oct →
anubis	13–6	0.10	33%	17 Oct →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	21%	17 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.02	28%	15 Oct →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	22%	15 Oct →
inferno	13–1	-0.01	18%	15 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.08	26%	15 Oct →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	22%	11 Oct →
cache	13–2	0.07	17%	11 Oct →
cache	13–7	0.04	20%	10 Oct →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	12%	10 Oct →
anubis	13–11	0.01	15%	9 Oct →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	19%	9 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	17%	9 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.06	21%	9 Oct →
nuke	13–4	-0.04	19%	7 Oct →
ancient	13–0	0.04	17%	6 Oct →
dust2	16–14	0.03	19%	4 Oct →
mirage	7–13	0.02	20%	4 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.03	20%	4 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	21%	3 Oct →
cache	0–8	-0.02	17%	3 Oct →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	12%	3 Oct →
cache	13–10	0.04	18%	3 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.01	24%	3 Oct →
anubis	15–15	0.05	29%	1 Oct →
cache	16–13	0.04	25%	30 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.04	19%	30 Sept →
cache	2–13	0.00	19%	29 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	21%	29 Sept →
train	5–13	-0.01	10%	27 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.14	10%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.08	30%	27 Sept →
office	3–13	-0.05	13%	27 Sept →
cache	13–2	0.16	24%	27 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.12	24%	26 Sept →
ancient	15–15	0.09	18%	26 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.03	20%	24 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.07	32%	24 Sept →
inferno	13–5	0.14	21%	24 Sept →
inferno	14–16	0.04	21%	24 Sept →
office	13–6	0.04	26%	20 Sept →
overpass	13–5	0.05	39%	19 Sept →
office	12–12	0.15	28%	19 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.00	20%	19 Sept →
office	13–7	-0.04	16%	19 Sept →
office	13–5	0.09	38%	17 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.04	15%	16 Sept →
cache	6–13	0.06	23%	16 Sept →
vertigo	4–13	-0.01	29%	14 Sept →
office	13–7	0.13	43%	14 Sept →
office	5–13	0.04	23%	13 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.07	24%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	26%	10 Sept →
debris	5–9	-0.12	19%	10 Sept →