Jonezki

Jonezki — CS2 Stats

76561198085022266[U:1:124756538]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,036Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating14,451Blue band · top ~31.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,139 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,451 +952 29 Aug – 4 Nov · 23 days played
13,01114,622peak 14,62229 Aug4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,139 +0 1 Sept – 16 Oct · 6 observations
1,1391,139peak 1,1391 Sept16 Oct
14,772Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,139Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-08-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,139
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 62 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 171 below peak (14,622)
  • +1,074 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 549 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJonezkiFACEITLevel 6 · 1,139 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER14,451 · Blue band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,139csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning60
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLTWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +4.8pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility6.0
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.0
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 2 Sept →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 1 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 1 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
11–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 16mirageWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2214–864%0.03
anubisB2210–1245%0.01
ancientB1910–953%0.01
nukeS1611–569%0.02
dust2A74–357%0.02
cacheC73–443%0.01
mirageC52–340%0.04
vertigo—20–20%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,392Matches
48%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
77.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient19450%1.1216.7
Inferno18253%1.1716.9
Anubis15243%1.0816.9
Nuke14851%1.0816.1
Mirage5549%1.1115.8
Overpass4840%1.0416.8
Dust24738%1.0915.6
Train2148%1.1616.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
562msReaction time
40.1%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
7.69HE damage / grenade
13.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0523%4 Nov →
mirage15–150.0112%4 Nov →
inferno16–14-0.038%3 Nov →
inferno17–190.0317%3 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.0017%2 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.0118%2 Nov →
inferno13–40.1025%2 Nov →
nuke13–8-0.0620%31 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0625%31 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0319%30 Oct →
nuke13–60.0513%30 Oct →
nuke13–70.1419%30 Oct →
inferno13–50.0114%30 Oct →
dust213–50.1412%30 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0323%29 Oct →
anubis13–110.047%29 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0311%28 Oct →
inferno13–110.0411%25 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.008%25 Oct →
inferno13–110.0617%20 Oct →
cache13–80.0022%19 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0014%18 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0817%18 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0120%17 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0220%17 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0117%17 Oct →
nuke13–90.0514%15 Oct →
dust215–150.0212%15 Oct →
ancient13–100.0017%13 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0617%10 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0016%8 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0226%7 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0020%2 Oct →
ancient11–130.0119%2 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0618%2 Oct →
ancient13–60.038%1 Oct →
anubis12–160.0323%29 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0424%29 Sept →
mirage20–220.0319%28 Sept →
nuke13–90.0516%28 Sept →
anubis7–130.0621%27 Sept →
ancient13–80.0720%27 Sept →
ancient9–130.0118%25 Sept →
inferno13–80.0028%24 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.0513%23 Sept →
ancient13–70.0614%22 Sept →
anubis13–110.029%22 Sept →
inferno5–130.0324%14 Sept →
nuke13–110.0421%13 Sept →
cache13–80.0816%13 Sept →
inferno11–130.0116%11 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.025%10 Sept →
cache9–130.0530%10 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0512%9 Sept →
anubis9–130.0316%9 Sept →
nuke16–120.0621%8 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0314%8 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0211%7 Sept →
inferno16–130.0622%6 Sept →
mirage13–40.0425%6 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0220%6 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0222%4 Sept →
nuke13–20.0829%4 Sept →
inferno13–80.0625%4 Sept →
ancient16–120.0717%4 Sept →
anubis13–30.0618%4 Sept →
inferno13–40.028%4 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0229%4 Sept →
inferno16–140.0127%4 Sept →
vertigo9–130.0524%4 Sept →
anubis13–110.0420%4 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0412%4 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0614%3 Sept →
ancient13–60.0118%3 Sept →
anubis16–140.0120%2 Sept →
dust213–10.0622%2 Sept →
ancient13–110.0223%2 Sept →
nuke13–20.1725%2 Sept →
nuke17–190.0122%1 Sept →
inferno13–20.1725%1 Sept →
anubis13–90.0217%1 Sept →
cache10–130.0215%1 Sept →
inferno13–80.0636%1 Sept →
mirage13–40.0616%31 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0221%31 Aug →
anubis5–130.0627%30 Aug →
inferno13–50.1418%30 Aug →
dust213–90.0014%30 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0117%29 Aug →
anubis13–80.0913%29 Aug →
ancient13–50.0117%29 Aug →
vertigo11–130.0122%28 Aug →
ancient10–130.0419%28 Aug →
ancient13–80.0814%28 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0011%28 Aug →
anubis22–180.0113%27 Aug →
cache24–28-0.0314%27 Aug →
inferno11–130.0730%26 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0117%26 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0220%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.