curlyfriis

curlyfriis — CS2 Stats

76561198079488455[U:1:119222727]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

3,531Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,505Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 Developing
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning54
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48502Last 10048%Win rateLTWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression7.3
Utility7.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.4
Utility7.6
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time643ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — alpine 13–3
133Biggest win — alpine
5Longest win streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9infernoWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC27121544%0.01
infernoD1861233%0.00
overpassS128467%0.04
anubisS97278%-0.01
ancientC83538%0.03
trainD62433%0.02
cache42250%0.00
office4040%0.04
dust232167%0.01
rooftop32167%-0.03
vertigo21150%0.02
poseidon1010%0.02
sanctum110100%0.10
alpine110100%0.12
mirage110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

153,698Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
6,110Matches
42.7%Match win rate
53.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
14,681MVPs
3,047Hours (in match)
7,872Bombs planted
2,443Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4767,862
AWP7,977
MAC-103,413
MP93,176
Knife2,674

Lifetime map wins

12,750nuke
10,929inferno
8,584vertigo
4,789train
3,328dust2
183office
176lake
96cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,730Matches
50%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
82.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke27659%1.4019.1
Anubis26748%1.1917.0
Ancient24644%1.1216.8
Inferno15241%1.1415.9
Vertigo14049%1.3117.8
Overpass8752%1.2218.5
Dust24740%1.0416.2
Train4450%1.2917.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
66.8%Counter-strafing
13.0°Preaim
631msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
11.27HE damage / grenade
14.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.0052° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–13-0.0319%17 Aug
train12–120.0612%16 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0119%30 Jul
cache2–13-0.045%24 Jul
inferno6–130.028%21 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0114%21 Jul
cache5–9-0.0314%13 Jul
nuke4–13-0.045%12 Jul
ancient11–130.0910%4 Jul
cache13–50.0914%4 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0118%2 Jul
ancient13–80.0825%27 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0027%27 Jun
nuke16–120.0423%27 Jun
nuke13–80.0433%26 Jun
nuke11–130.0821%12 Jun
poseidon7–90.0226%11 Jun
nuke13–100.0424%9 Jun
vertigo8–130.0325%5 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0135%31 May
inferno9–130.0519%27 May
office11–130.0630%17 May
overpass13–10-0.0122%15 May
sanctum9–50.1034%9 May
cache13–10-0.0124%30 Apr
anubis13–50.0219%30 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0024%30 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0717%22 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0318%20 Apr
overpass8–130.0726%10 Apr
ancient13–100.0214%10 Apr
overpass16–130.0024%9 Apr
nuke7–130.0022%7 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0324%5 Apr
office6–130.0916%20 Mar
overpass25–220.0724%16 Mar
overpass12–120.0816%11 Mar
office8–13-0.0313%18 Feb
dust216–130.0214%13 Feb
dust210–13-0.068%13 Feb
inferno10–130.1020%12 Feb
nuke11–130.0518%12 Feb
overpass11–130.0623%11 Feb
anubis13–90.0427%11 Feb
inferno4–130.0114%11 Feb
vertigo13–90.0218%11 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0131%8 Feb
nuke16–120.0125%8 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0616%5 Feb
alpine13–30.1237%4 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0413%31 Jan
nuke13–90.0522%31 Jan
inferno13–3-0.0424%31 Jan
nuke16–14-0.0430%29 Jan
nuke11–130.0637%27 Jan
office7–130.0322%20 Jan
overpass10–130.0022%16 Jan
inferno13–70.0315%12 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0513%12 Jan
anubis13–6-0.0018%10 Jan
inferno13–90.0122%10 Jan
train13–40.0218%9 Jan
train7–13-0.0221%9 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0022%9 Jan
overpass13–50.0624%8 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0022%7 Jan
train3–130.0922%6 Jan
overpass16–130.0228%2 Jan
inferno8–13-0.029%1 Jan
inferno13–40.0837%27 Dec
nuke3–13-0.0836%27 Dec
mirage13–80.0117%27 Dec
ancient13–60.0721%25 Dec
nuke13–80.1229%25 Dec
nuke9–130.0228%25 Dec
train7–13-0.0329%25 Dec
nuke13–50.0029%2 Dec
inferno13–9-0.0526%12 Nov
train13–30.0235%12 Nov
inferno12–160.0127%5 Nov
nuke13–100.0432%5 Nov
nuke14–160.0323%5 Nov
nuke5–9-0.0221%5 Nov
dust213–80.0626%1 Nov
inferno10–130.0224%31 Oct
ancient10–13-0.0114%29 Oct
nuke10–130.0627%29 Oct
overpass13–80.1130%27 Oct
inferno13–90.0220%26 Oct
nuke10–13-0.0213%24 Oct
inferno4–13-0.0513%16 Oct
rooftop9–70.0613%16 Oct
rooftop9–70.0417%16 Oct
rooftop1–9-0.1913%16 Oct
ancient29–310.0115%10 Oct
nuke4–13-0.0630%1 Oct
nuke16–12-0.0533%26 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0131%22 Sept
overpass13–9-0.0328%19 Sept
overpass13–100.0323%17 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →