Stabberr

Stabberr — CS2 Stats

GB76561198078926736[U:1:118661008]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

348Tracked matches33%Win rate2023Tracked since
878Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating1.9 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating6,884Light Blue band · top ~69.8% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 9 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,884 -4,997 9 May12 Sept · 35 days played
6,66412,287peak 12,2879 May12 Sept
12,287Peak Premier in tracked matches
56Days played since 2026-05-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,403 below peak (12,287)
  • -978 over 30 days · declining
  • -3,632 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 3,116 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,820), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate31.6%39.9%41.9%10.4% short
Shot accuracy13.1%6.9%9.6%above
Kill/death ratio0.950.920.980.03 short
Match win rate44.0%42.3%43.8%meets

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStabberrPREMIER6,884 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim18
Positioning38
Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD29674Last 10029%Win rateLLLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.8pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 6%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 7%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim1.8
Utility2.6
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 34% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 62% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim1.8
Positioning3.8
Utility2.6
Mechanics2.8
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 1.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time645ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 645ms
Headshot accuracy10.1%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 10.3% → last ⅓ avg 10.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 21 Jun
23%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 21 May
391msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 21 Jun
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 1 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L7Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 24anubisWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2561924%-0.03
nukeB24121250%-0.02
infernoD2351822%-0.04
anubisD112918%-0.02
ancientD82625%-0.04
cache42250%-0.02
dust23030%-0.07
overpass2020%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

20,246Lifetime kills
0.95K/D · Top 50% of Light Blue band
1,103Matches
44.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Light Blue band
31.6%Headshot %
13.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Light Blue band
2,349MVPs
463Hours (in match)
1,287Bombs planted
216Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,910dust2
1,170inferno
843nuke
68vertigo
27train
16office
11safehouse
5house

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.0%Headshot accuracy
28.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
62.4%Counter-strafing
13.4°Preaim
644msReaction time
14.2%T opening success
34.4%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
0.5%Flash assists
8.10HE damage / grenade
2.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.3767° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.9639% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3232 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis4–13-0.077%12 Sept
mirage4–13-0.056%12 Sept
inferno1–13-0.048%29 Aug
ancient6–13-0.090%29 Aug
anubis9–13-0.077%21 Aug
mirage9–130.0312%21 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0416%10 Aug
inferno13–9-0.033%10 Aug
mirage13–9-0.043%9 Aug
nuke13–90.045%9 Aug
nuke16–13-0.089%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0414%4 Aug
nuke4–13-0.048%4 Aug
anubis8–130.0221%3 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0412%1 Aug
nuke13–20.0511%1 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0710%1 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0316%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0612%29 Jul
nuke13–100.0211%28 Jul
nuke13–16-0.056%27 Jul
nuke11–13-0.038%27 Jul
nuke7–2-0.0417%26 Jul
mirage7–13-0.087%26 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0911%26 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0511%24 Jul
dust210–13-0.0618%24 Jul
mirage6–13-0.086%24 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0317%23 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0111%23 Jul
mirage14–160.0016%21 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0910%21 Jul
nuke9–13-0.044%19 Jul
mirage6–13-0.029%19 Jul
anubis13–70.0120%19 Jul
nuke10–13-0.019%19 Jul
cache13–60.048%16 Jul
ancient9–130.0219%15 Jul
inferno9–130.003%15 Jul
inferno13–7-0.018%14 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0511%11 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0412%10 Jul
cache4–13-0.100%9 Jul
anubis3–130.0217%8 Jul
overpass5–13-0.068%6 Jul
nuke10–130.0612%3 Jul
mirage7–13-0.042%3 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0121%1 Jul
anubis10–13-0.085%1 Jul
mirage13–110.0310%1 Jul
mirage6–13-0.074%30 Jun
nuke4–130.037%28 Jun
nuke15–15-0.027%27 Jun
inferno9–13-0.095%27 Jun
dust28–13-0.0813%25 Jun
overpass14–16-0.0612%23 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0212%21 Jun
anubis13–60.0710%21 Jun
nuke16–14-0.069%19 Jun
cache13–9-0.058%16 Jun
inferno8–130.0014%15 Jun
anubis15–15-0.008%15 Jun
mirage4–13-0.015%14 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0813%13 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0210%11 Jun
nuke13–40.0415%9 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0513%6 Jun
inferno2–13-0.090%6 Jun
inferno5–130.005%5 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0519%1 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0820%25 May
inferno13–11-0.0411%25 May
cache12–120.025%25 May
inferno4–13-0.088%24 May
mirage7–13-0.0014%24 May
nuke16–14-0.029%24 May
inferno14–16-0.0312%24 May
mirage13–7-0.0314%23 May
mirage11–13-0.012%23 May
mirage13–10-0.0418%22 May
ancient6–13-0.0414%21 May
inferno4–13-0.0511%21 May
mirage13–30.0523%21 May
nuke13–8-0.026%21 May
ancient10–13-0.036%17 May
mirage3–13-0.0519%17 May
mirage8–13-0.074%16 May
mirage8–13-0.0314%16 May
anubis5–13-0.007%16 May
mirage13–160.0012%16 May
inferno8–13-0.0313%16 May
inferno8–13-0.129%15 May
ancient13–10-0.103%14 May
inferno2–13-0.068%12 May
nuke13–7-0.0613%12 May
inferno2–13-0.090%12 May
dust25–13-0.078%12 May
nuke13–5-0.045%11 May
nuke15–150.0214%9 May
ancient8–130.0116%9 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →