ikkas

ikkas — CS2 Stats

US76561198078723298[U:1:118457570]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

845Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,465Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,765Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53785 of 232043 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 5 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,765 -6,073 5 Apr17 Sept · 33 days played
21,32728,436peak 28,4365 Apr17 Sept
28,436Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-04-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 6,671 below peak (28,436)
  • -973 over 30 days · declining
  • -6,212 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,235 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches31+2
Win rate0%100%−100pp
K/D1.172.00−0.83
Headshot %50%60%−10pp

Measured 13 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 13 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.7%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy17.6%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.431.061.07above
Match win rate33.4%46.3%46.9%13.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGikkasFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,765 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning57
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42571Last 10042%Win rateLLLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −75ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 493ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility2.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.7
Utility2.0
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time586ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 29 Jul
38%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · inferno, 25 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · nuke, 29 Jun
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 10infernoWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC30121840%-0.00
cacheA1710759%0.00
ancientC1761135%0.01
anubisB115645%0.01
nukeA106460%0.02
infernoD8080%0.02
dust2C52340%-0.02
overpass21150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

175,350Lifetime kills
1.43K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
6,883Matches
33.4%Match win rate
51.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
12,944MVPs
2,468Hours (in match)
2,895Bombs planted
836Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4769,480
AWP18,497
SSG 085,853
UMP-453,008
P2502,612

Lifetime map wins

8,144dust2
4,399inferno
1,588train
1,102nuke
596cbble
562vertigo
179lake
137safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

428Matches
55%Win rate
1.52Avg K/D
96.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1867%1.5219.2
Ancient1369%1.2018.0
Anubis757%1.1319.7
Cache475%1.1519.5
Dust2250%1.2619.5
Train10%1.2024.0
Inferno1100%1.0523.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
576msReaction time
37.1%T opening success
58.6%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
7.18HE damage / grenade
1.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3348 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.0835% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–90.0514%17 Sept
mirage5–130.1025%17 Sept
mirage10–130.0418%17 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0514%15 Sept
nuke13–90.0831%11 Sept
cache13–9-0.0113%1 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0611%1 Sept
cache13–100.019%31 Aug
mirage2–130.0533%31 Aug
nuke11–130.0822%29 Aug
ancient4–130.0720%29 Aug
dust24–13-0.0018%29 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0313%27 Aug
inferno4–90.0235%27 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0528%26 Aug
mirage13–40.0310%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.0514%25 Aug
cache16–120.0519%25 Aug
mirage5–130.0120%24 Aug
ancient13–30.0711%24 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0118%7 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0020%7 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0515%7 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0210%5 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0121%5 Aug
cache13–100.0316%5 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0018%31 Jul
nuke7–130.0029%30 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0222%29 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0012%29 Jul
cache13–9-0.0118%29 Jul
anubis13–60.1121%29 Jul
cache13–3-0.0528%29 Jul
cache13–110.0516%28 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0128%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0413%28 Jul
cache10–13-0.0016%28 Jul
cache7–13-0.0213%26 Jul
mirage12–160.0218%26 Jul
dust21–13-0.0835%26 Jul
cache13–50.0411%26 Jul
nuke8–130.0625%25 Jul
inferno8–130.0238%25 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0317%23 Jul
mirage13–80.0627%15 Jul
ancient2–130.0421%15 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0215%15 Jul
cache9–13-0.0412%13 Jul
cache4–130.0424%13 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0823%13 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0315%10 Jul
cache16–140.0730%10 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0516%10 Jul
mirage13–90.0110%10 Jul
anubis13–100.0222%10 Jul
cache9–13-0.0432%9 Jul
cache13–60.0217%9 Jul
cache8–13-0.0017%9 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0120%9 Jul
mirage5–130.0114%9 Jul
dust213–11-0.0212%9 Jul
cache4–13-0.0623%9 Jul
ancient11–130.0218%6 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0617%1 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0417%29 Jun
ancient11–130.0525%29 Jun
nuke13–100.0232%29 Jun
anubis5–130.0334%29 Jun
nuke3–130.0128%11 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0610%11 Jun
mirage9–130.0419%25 May
inferno7–130.0515%25 May
nuke16–12-0.0416%25 May
mirage13–4-0.0415%25 May
ancient11–13-0.0015%25 May
ancient13–6-0.0111%20 May
mirage13–80.0514%20 May
anubis13–30.0810%17 May
nuke13–8-0.0323%17 May
anubis14–16-0.0110%4 May
mirage11–130.0113%23 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0615%23 Apr
mirage13–6-0.079%23 Apr
nuke13–40.0715%23 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0511%22 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0323%21 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0518%18 Apr
dust213–40.0413%16 Apr
anubis7–130.0213%16 Apr
ancient13–70.0413%15 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0018%12 Apr
mirage9–40.0119%12 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0315%12 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0220%10 Apr
ancient10–130.0514%9 Apr
mirage8–130.0012%9 Apr
inferno11–130.0319%9 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0217%9 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0215%5 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0522%5 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →