AbgasAchim — CS2 Stats

76561198073607109[U:1:113341381]

1,478Tracked matches40%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,652Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,897Purple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12954 of 30973 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate62.6%44.2%44.9%above
Shot accuracy9.5%11.2%11.8%2.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.901.041.04above
Match win rate47.2%45.3%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAbgasAchimFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,897 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning48
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51463Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7
Aggression4.9
Utility4.6
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.8
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time567ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy10.8%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 10.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–4
131Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 16mirageWeakest map · 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2191243%-0.01
cacheA1610663%0.01
ancientA159660%0.00
nukeA116555%-0.00
infernoA106460%-0.02
mirageD101910%-0.04
anubisC73443%-0.01
overpass43175%0.02
shelter21150%-0.02
train110100%-0.00
vertigo1010%0.00
fachwerk110100%0.01
boulder110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

124,817Lifetime kills
1.90K/D · Top 5% of Level 5 players
3,723Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
62.6%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players
9.5%Shot accuracy
8,598MVPs
1,474Hours (in match)
3,743Bombs planted
711Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4770,892
AWP6,221
MP93,383
UMP-453,082
Negev1,830

Lifetime map wins

5,763nuke
5,381dust2
4,746inferno
1,868vertigo
1,049train
306cbble
277office
246dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

107Matches
54%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
84.3ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22450%1.0114.2
Mirage2255%1.0215.4
Inferno1735%1.0015.7
Anubis1040%1.5720.2
Nuke1080%1.6013.9
Ancient786%1.7417.7
Cache475%1.6517.3
Train3100%1.4919.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.0%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.5%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
575msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
38.0%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
10.29HE damage / grenade
3.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.9882% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.9806 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.9461% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0410%23 Aug
shelter4–13-0.027%22 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0111%22 Aug
anubis13–80.044%22 Aug
nuke8–13-0.042%22 Aug
ancient1–130.0513%22 Aug
cache13–70.008%22 Aug
cache13–4-0.0614%20 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0111%19 Aug
nuke8–13-0.079%19 Aug
dust213–11-0.0122%19 Aug
cache13–10-0.0311%18 Aug
mirage7–13-0.1015%18 Aug
cache8–130.0310%18 Aug
dust213–60.047%17 Aug
nuke13–60.0625%17 Aug
inferno13–90.018%17 Aug
ancient4–13-0.079%17 Aug
mirage6–13-0.064%17 Aug
inferno6–13-0.049%10 Aug
ancient13–90.069%10 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0217%10 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0019%10 Aug
anubis11–130.028%10 Aug
dust213–110.0115%10 Aug
inferno5–13-0.029%10 Aug
cache12–16-0.039%8 Aug
ancient2–13-0.060%8 Aug
cache13–5-0.0114%7 Aug
inferno9–6-0.096%7 Aug
cache2–130.0113%7 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0312%7 Aug
inferno13–70.0115%7 Aug
train13–6-0.006%6 Aug
vertigo6–130.0014%6 Aug
shelter13–11-0.0211%5 Aug
fachwerk10–30.0113%5 Aug
boulder13–100.0716%5 Aug
cache13–50.0011%5 Aug
ancient13–30.0310%4 Aug
inferno13–100.0110%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0412%4 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0212%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0315%4 Aug
dust213–60.0112%4 Aug
inferno16–13-0.017%4 Aug
anubis13–10-0.078%3 Aug
dust212–16-0.036%3 Aug
cache5–13-0.0510%3 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0014%3 Aug
cache14–160.0810%3 Aug
nuke13–80.0615%3 Aug
mirage11–13-0.119%29 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0821%29 Jul
ancient13–40.1112%27 Jul
nuke13–10-0.016%27 Jul
dust212–12-0.0813%12 Jul
dust25–13-0.0313%12 Jul
cache13–60.0111%12 Jul
cache12–12-0.0313%7 Jul
cache13–9-0.0014%7 Jul
cache13–10.018%7 Jul
mirage7–13-0.018%29 Jun
ancient15–150.049%29 Jun
anubis11–13-0.029%26 Jun
dust214–160.0414%26 Jun
dust210–13-0.075%18 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0511%18 Jun
nuke9–13-0.077%16 Jun
dust27–13-0.0215%16 Jun
overpass13–90.0417%16 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0313%16 Jun
ancient13–10-0.057%12 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0212%12 Jun
ancient13–90.0310%8 Jun
dust24–13-0.0619%8 Jun
dust213–60.0217%8 Jun
overpass13–8-0.019%1 Jun
dust213–50.0410%1 Jun
ancient13–20.025%1 Jun
cache13–80.0918%5 May
ancient13–30.0510%5 May
nuke6–130.0116%5 May
overpass13–40.0813%5 May
nuke9–60.0412%5 May
cache13–80.0925%29 Apr
dust210–13-0.047%28 Apr
nuke9–130.0011%27 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0515%27 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0118%22 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0014%22 Apr
nuke13–110.0018%20 Apr
dust20–13-0.077%20 Apr
dust213–40.0417%20 Apr
dust213–60.0617%20 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0211%19 Apr
anubis5–130.029%19 Apr
dust27–13-0.0614%19 Apr
dust211–13-0.0210%14 Apr
dust27–13-0.0011%14 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →