Raffel Biceps

Raffel Biceps — CS2 Stats

76561198199230554[U:1:238964826]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,438Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,233Top 10% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11754 of 259040 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,233 +2,513 25 Apr – 27 Oct · 30 days played
22,96526,233peak 26,23325 Apr27 Oct
26,233Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2026-04-25

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,233
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,767 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRaffel BicepsFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,233 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning58
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–40–6Last 10054%Win rateWLWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 469ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility4.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.8
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time509ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 15 Oct →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 13 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 22 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3822–1658%0.01
mirageB178–947%-0.00
ancientB158–753%-0.00
infernoA117–464%-0.01
cacheB105–550%0.02
nukeD51–420%0.01
overpass—32–167%-0.03
vertigo—11–0100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

873Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
81.9ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust29058%1.0816.7
Mirage6552%0.9815.7
Inferno4351%0.9714.7
Ancient4252%0.9015.6
Anubis1631%0.8814.8
Nuke1547%1.0415.7
Cache1173%1.0716.1
Overpass786%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
501msReaction time
63.4%T opening success
40.2%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
8.01HE damage / grenade
3.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4843 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0117%27 Oct →
cache2–130.0310%27 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.005%26 Oct →
dust213–110.0224%26 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0820%25 Oct →
ancient6–130.0316%24 Oct →
mirage8–130.0114%24 Oct →
vertigo13–0-0.0523%22 Oct →
cache11–130.0514%21 Oct →
ancient7–130.0018%18 Oct →
mirage13–100.0420%18 Oct →
dust216–140.0318%18 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0625%17 Oct →
cache13–30.0138%17 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0712%16 Oct →
dust213–40.1415%15 Oct →
dust213–10.0223%15 Oct →
ancient7–130.0121%15 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0218%13 Oct →
nuke13–100.0523%13 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0212%13 Oct →
inferno13–70.0131%12 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0438%13 Sept →
dust213–20.0548%13 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0929%13 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0122%4 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0719%19 Aug →
dust213–110.0111%19 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0215%17 Jul →
dust213–3-0.0024%14 Jul →
dust212–12-0.0132%12 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0031%12 Jul →
cache13–60.1015%12 Jul →
dust29–130.0434%12 Jul →
dust27–13-0.058%12 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0429%12 Jul →
dust213–20.0624%10 Jul →
cache13–110.0414%10 Jul →
mirage7–130.0222%4 Jul →
dust28–130.0411%2 Jul →
mirage15–150.0220%1 Jul →
ancient13–20.0714%27 Jun →
ancient2–6-0.0114%27 Jun →
inferno9–130.047%22 Jun →
overpass1–13-0.100%22 Jun →
mirage16–140.0011%21 Jun →
mirage8–130.0323%21 Jun →
mirage13–110.0416%21 Jun →
nuke9–130.0622%16 Jun →
dust27–130.007%16 Jun →
ancient10–60.1018%15 Jun →
mirage9–130.0117%15 Jun →
overpass13–20.046%13 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0520%13 Jun →
inferno13–50.0013%12 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0129%12 Jun →
ancient13–100.0123%9 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0617%9 Jun →
nuke6–130.0423%9 Jun →
inferno13–40.1029%7 Jun →
dust213–80.1127%4 Jun →
dust213–80.0344%2 Jun →
cache13–8-0.0315%31 May →
inferno2–13-0.0618%31 May →
cache16–13-0.0113%29 May →
dust28–13-0.0818%29 May →
inferno8–130.0429%27 May →
dust213–60.0525%25 May →
inferno13–9-0.0610%21 May →
ancient13–9-0.0216%21 May →
dust28–130.0833%21 May →
inferno13–0-0.010%21 May →
dust213–6-0.0221%18 May →
cache12–12-0.0217%18 May →
cache12–120.0312%18 May →
dust212–12-0.0338%14 May →
dust213–9-0.0322%14 May →
mirage13–100.0114%14 May →
mirage15–150.0012%13 May →
overpass13–8-0.0312%13 May →
ancient11–130.0013%13 May →
ancient13–9-0.0222%13 May →
dust213–70.0317%13 May →
nuke6–13-0.0315%12 May →
ancient13–4-0.0414%12 May →
dust213–40.0537%12 May →
dust213–90.0126%11 May →
dust213–40.0929%11 May →
inferno13–6-0.0020%11 May →
dust213–60.0123%10 May →
ancient13–5-0.0522%10 May →
ancient13–10-0.0336%9 May →
mirage13–10-0.0426%8 May →
dust213–10-0.0133%8 May →
dust28–13-0.0427%4 May →
mirage9–13-0.0321%4 May →
ancient13–6-0.0523%4 May →
dust29–130.0313%27 Apr →
dust20–13-0.0725%25 Apr →
mirage13–10.0314%25 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.