Karrkassonne

Karrkassonne — CS2 Stats

CA76561198071422805[U:1:111157077]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

320Tracked matches50%Win rate2026Tracked since
149Hours in CS
CSDB Rating2.9 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating5,000Light Blue band · top ~78.8% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 320 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,000 +2,379 7 Aug – 20 Sept · 7 days played
2,6215,180peak 5,1807 Aug20 Sept
5,180Peak Premier in tracked matches
25Days played since 2026-07-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 180 below peak (5,180)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,820), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate34.8%39.9%42.0%7.2% short
Shot accuracy3.4%7.0%9.6%6.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.530.920.980.45 short
Match win rate31.3%42.3%43.8%12.5% short

This profile sits below the typical Blue band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKarrkassonnePREMIER5,000 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim23
Positioning27
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38–60–2Last 10038%Win rateWLWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 762ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 766ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 760ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim2.3
Utility2.0
Positioning2.7
Opening Duels0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 11% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 749ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.3
Positioning2.7
Utility2.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 2.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.07+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.08 → last ⅓ avg -0.07
Reaction time750ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 752ms → last ⅓ avg 750ms
Headshot accuracy10.4%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 10.5% → last ⅓ avg 10.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 8 Aug →
22%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 11 Aug →
453msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · inferno, 13 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 9 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11cacheWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD186–1233%-0.06
nukeC167–944%-0.07
mirageB168–850%-0.06
cacheD154–1127%-0.05
anubisA117–464%-0.05
ancientD103–730%-0.08
dust2D103–730%-0.05
debris—20–20%-0.21
vertigo—10–10%-0.07
poseidon—10–10%-0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

4,444Lifetime kills
0.53K/D
470Matches
31.3%Match win rate
34.8%Headshot %
3.4%Shot accuracy
321MVPs
149Hours (in match)
389Bombs planted
61Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

446inferno
397dust2
339nuke
124vertigo
67office
45train
8italy
7safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.3%Headshot accuracy
28.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
13.7°Preaim
749msReaction time
10.9%T opening success
37.3%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
7.88HE damage / grenade
1.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.6644° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.2847% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  3. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 749.4932ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.0620%28 Aug →
cache9–13-0.1115%22 Aug →
dust212–4-0.070%22 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.1315%22 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.014%15 Aug →
dust210–13-0.124%15 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.077%15 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0621%14 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0612%14 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.1210%14 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0314%14 Aug →
debris0–9-0.340%14 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.095%14 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0813%12 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0222%11 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0519%11 Aug →
cache9–13-0.086%11 Aug →
mirage13–60.017%10 Aug →
mirage13–50.0014%9 Aug →
cache13–3-0.059%9 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0317%9 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.085%9 Aug →
nuke13–2-0.083%9 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.038%9 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.073%8 Aug →
dust213–20.0810%8 Aug →
nuke0–5-0.0817%8 Aug →
dust22–8-0.090%8 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0717%8 Aug →
inferno16–12-0.0716%8 Aug →
anubis13–2-0.0318%7 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.063%7 Aug →
vertigo4–13-0.0710%7 Aug →
cache13–5-0.063%7 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0814%7 Aug →
dust24–13-0.086%4 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.100%4 Aug →
mirage11–130.0010%3 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0612%3 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0312%3 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0419%3 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.089%2 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0611%2 Aug →
dust21–120.0111%2 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0612%2 Aug →
anubis1–10-0.0522%2 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0616%2 Aug →
ancient8–1-0.070%1 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0514%1 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0413%1 Aug →
cache2–11-0.057%1 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.087%1 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.069%31 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.027%29 Jul →
cache4–80.0115%29 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0911%27 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0711%27 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0811%27 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.059%26 Jul →
dust26–130.0117%25 Jul →
anubis13–3-0.0310%25 Jul →
nuke13–100.018%25 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.079%25 Jul →
nuke13–110.0013%25 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0514%25 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0913%24 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0721%24 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.028%24 Jul →
cache12–12-0.095%16 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0814%16 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0112%16 Jul →
inferno2–9-0.0521%16 Jul →
dust25–13-0.110%16 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.1021%15 Jul →
inferno7–9-0.039%15 Jul →
nuke9–7-0.076%15 Jul →
inferno2–9-0.2320%15 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.058%15 Jul →
dust213–7-0.035%15 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.057%15 Jul →
dust21–2-0.150%15 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.052%14 Jul →
cache13–7-0.057%14 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0710%14 Jul →
cache1–13-0.106%14 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0717%14 Jul →
cache12–120.0522%14 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.038%13 Jul →
nuke9–6-0.0720%13 Jul →
nuke3–11-0.0717%13 Jul →
nuke1–9-0.227%13 Jul →
inferno5–9-0.069%13 Jul →
debris2–9-0.0814%13 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0719%13 Jul →
inferno5–9-0.0113%13 Jul →
inferno6–9-0.166%13 Jul →
poseidon4–9-0.177%13 Jul →
mirage13–30.0413%12 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.099%12 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.136%12 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.