Zee -ILMB-

Zee -ILMB- — CS2 Stats

76561198068083269[U:1:107817541]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

721Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,528Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,893 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 721 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 2 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,274 +4,822 2 Dec12 Jan · 18 days played
19,45224,391peak 24,3912 Dec12 Jan
Faceit ELO: 1,893 +0 4 Sept11 Sept · 2 observations
1,8931,893peak 1,8934 Sept11 Sept
24,391Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,893Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2025-12-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,893
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 108 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 11 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 11 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate42.8%48.3%51.0%8.2% short
Shot accuracy17.1%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.021.071.090.06 short
Match win rate43.6%46.9%48.4%4.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZee -ILMB-FACEITLevel 9 · 1,893 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,893csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning65
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57421Last 10057%Win rateWLLLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +8.5pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 615ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility4.2
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning6.5
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time599ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+6.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–9 · ancient, 21 Dec
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · mirage, 14 Mar
469msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 29 Jan
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 15 Dec

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
187In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 45% over 33
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB33151845%-0.01
infernoB25131252%-0.01
nukeS1813572%0.00
ancientA1710759%0.02
overpassS550100%0.00
cache21150%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 33). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

125,425Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
5,265Matches
43.6%Match win rate
42.8%Headshot %
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
13,912MVPs
2,528Hours (in match)
6,410Bombs planted
1,574Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,020
AWP15,793
P2503,512
P901,857
UMP-451,729

Lifetime map wins

13,064inferno
7,035nuke
2,309dust2
1,526train
973cbble
185vertigo
104lake
100safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

935Matches
53%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
81.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7158%1.0016.4
Inferno4146%1.0518.2
Nuke3847%1.0116.0
Ancient3152%1.1016.8
Overpass978%1.2819.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
620msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
43.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
10.98HE damage / grenade
5.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2004% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 33 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.0018%24 Jun
inferno11–130.0117%24 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0118%30 Apr
cache4–130.0121%29 Apr
cache13–9-0.019%29 Apr
mirage0–2-0.09100%14 Mar
mirage13–90.0516%14 Mar
ancient9–130.0112%11 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0115%10 Mar
inferno19–170.0820%10 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0113%6 Mar
mirage13–110.0625%5 Mar
inferno5–13-0.044%5 Mar
ancient13–90.0023%3 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0016%3 Mar
inferno7–130.0222%22 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0812%22 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0510%20 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0623%20 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0315%20 Feb
nuke13–40.0411%20 Feb
mirage13–110.0310%17 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0913%16 Feb
mirage5–1-0.0620%16 Feb
ancient2–00.06100%16 Feb
nuke13–110.0615%11 Feb
nuke13–50.0223%11 Feb
mirage13–110.0028%11 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0531%10 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0634%10 Feb
inferno16–12-0.0117%9 Feb
nuke16–14-0.0217%4 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0529%4 Feb
mirage13–110.0223%4 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0612%29 Jan
overpass13–9-0.015%22 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0116%20 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0019%15 Jan
ancient8–13-0.017%15 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0711%12 Jan
nuke13–9-0.0621%11 Jan
inferno17–19-0.0314%11 Jan
mirage13–50.0535%10 Jan
ancient13–110.0225%3 Jan
nuke13–70.0013%3 Jan
mirage13–100.0111%2 Jan
inferno13–110.0724%26 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0922%22 Dec
mirage9–130.0230%21 Dec
ancient13–90.0912%21 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0113%21 Dec
mirage4–13-0.0425%21 Dec
ancient13–70.0714%21 Dec
ancient6–13-0.0123%19 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0310%19 Dec
nuke13–160.0026%18 Dec
ancient15–15-0.0013%18 Dec
mirage13–70.0516%18 Dec
nuke13–10-0.0014%18 Dec
inferno2–13-0.0816%18 Dec
mirage13–70.0225%16 Dec
nuke10–13-0.0418%16 Dec
inferno13–40.0428%16 Dec
mirage3–130.0122%16 Dec
inferno13–70.0523%16 Dec
mirage11–13-0.027%15 Dec
ancient13–60.0513%15 Dec
nuke13–20.0226%15 Dec
mirage3–13-0.0315%15 Dec
mirage4–13-0.0719%15 Dec
nuke13–90.0814%15 Dec
nuke13–70.0219%14 Dec
inferno13–7-0.048%14 Dec
ancient13–70.0422%14 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0617%14 Dec
inferno11–13-0.026%14 Dec
overpass13–50.0113%13 Dec
ancient13–90.0323%13 Dec
nuke13–80.0428%13 Dec
mirage3–130.0117%13 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0115%11 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0713%11 Dec
inferno13–110.0015%11 Dec
overpass13–70.0411%10 Dec
inferno13–6-0.0211%10 Dec
mirage3–13-0.029%10 Dec
mirage16–14-0.0113%9 Dec
inferno13–110.0312%9 Dec
mirage13–100.0227%7 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0418%6 Dec
inferno6–130.007%6 Dec
mirage9–130.0020%6 Dec
overpass13–11-0.0427%6 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0216%3 Dec
mirage13–40.0113%3 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0317%3 Dec
nuke13–50.0719%3 Dec
mirage13–100.0410%2 Dec
ancient13–80.0621%2 Dec
overpass13–40.0016%2 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →