Swarm

Swarm — CS2 Stats

76561198066366980[U:1:106101252]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,705Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,962Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,560Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80465 of 223119 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,739 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 2 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,560 -2,670 2 Mar9 Sept · 25 days played
18,39423,029peak 23,0292 Mar9 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,739 +0 30 Aug1 Sept · 2 observations
1,7391,739peak 1,73930 Aug1 Sept
23,029Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,739Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-03-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,739
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 12 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,469 below peak (23,029)
  • +945 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 440 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.4%46.8%48.3%2.9% short
Shot accuracy7.0%13.0%13.2%6.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.121.061.07above
Match win rate49.0%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSwarmFACEITLevel 8 · 1,739 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,560 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,739csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning58
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41554Last 10041%Win rateWLWWWWTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +5.2pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.8
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time623ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 17 Jul
33%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 1 Aug
461msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 30 Aug
13–1Biggest win · cache, 16 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 6infernoWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC28121643%0.01
dust2B26121446%0.02
ancientD134931%0.00
infernoD102820%0.02
anubisD82625%0.01
nukeB63350%0.02
cache43175%-0.03
vertigo32167%0.04
office1010%0.06
overpass110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

89,611Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,403Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
45.4%Headshot %
7.0%Shot accuracy
8,554MVPs
2,962Hours (in match)
4,419Bombs planted
1,154Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,426
AWP7,588
MP92,381
MAC-101,853
FAMAS1,750
P2501,693

Lifetime map wins

9,726dust2
6,409inferno
2,582nuke
2,332vertigo
963office
289train
105cbble
17italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

790Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
73.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24351%1.0314.2
Dust215051%1.0814.6
Inferno12252%1.1015.5
Ancient10151%1.0315.8
Anubis4753%1.1015.5
Overpass4060%1.0015.8
Nuke2948%0.9513.7
Vertigo1850%1.0917.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.3%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
627msReaction time
34.1%T opening success
54.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
9.97HE damage / grenade
7.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1161% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–20.0718%14 Sept
mirage11–130.0522%12 Sept
vertigo13–70.0112%11 Sept
mirage3–00.1027%11 Sept
mirage13–80.0927%11 Sept
dust213–30.1120%11 Sept
cache15–15-0.0719%9 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0017%8 Sept
dust26–13-0.0115%7 Sept
mirage5–130.0224%7 Sept
dust210–130.0613%2 Sept
dust23–130.0315%31 Aug
dust213–110.0518%31 Aug
mirage5–130.0212%30 Aug
dust213–80.0916%30 Aug
mirage7–130.0511%30 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0112%30 Aug
dust213–100.0511%30 Aug
vertigo12–120.0522%30 Aug
mirage13–100.0718%30 Aug
dust23–13-0.0130%29 Aug
dust210–130.0512%29 Aug
nuke9–130.0714%29 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0013%19 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0214%19 Aug
dust24–80.0314%16 Aug
ancient16–140.0216%1 Aug
cache13–90.0312%1 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0114%1 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0633%1 Aug
ancient0–5-0.0515%1 Aug
ancient13–160.0410%31 Jul
mirage10–4-0.046%31 Jul
anubis4–130.019%31 Jul
mirage11–130.0111%31 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0215%31 Jul
nuke7–130.0115%18 Jul
ancient9–13-0.049%18 Jul
ancient13–20.197%17 Jul
nuke13–30.0617%17 Jul
cache16–14-0.047%17 Jul
cache13–1-0.0417%16 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0411%29 Jun
mirage13–90.0112%29 Jun
ancient13–110.0315%15 Jun
inferno10–130.0216%4 Jun
dust210–13-0.0411%20 May
ancient8–130.0112%20 May
mirage13–60.0116%16 May
inferno13–40.0911%16 May
dust28–13-0.028%16 May
dust213–30.0021%6 May
mirage13–1-0.0428%6 May
inferno11–13-0.0513%6 May
office9–130.0621%5 May
mirage4–130.0322%5 May
dust28–13-0.0116%4 May
inferno12–120.119%4 May
mirage12–120.0210%3 May
ancient6–13-0.0717%3 May
dust213–110.0610%3 May
mirage0–9-0.0719%3 May
dust28–13-0.0219%20 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0523%20 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0314%14 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0313%9 Apr
anubis10–130.0215%9 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0222%7 Apr
mirage13–110.0118%1 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0221%31 Mar
dust26–13-0.039%31 Mar
inferno8–130.0111%30 Mar
dust29–130.0810%26 Mar
anubis13–70.1322%26 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0112%24 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0120%19 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0019%16 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0112%16 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0112%13 Mar
dust213–80.0221%11 Mar
mirage13–10.0822%11 Mar
overpass13–110.0612%11 Mar
dust216–140.0111%7 Mar
dust213–90.0110%7 Mar
inferno13–70.0414%7 Mar
inferno11–130.0110%6 Mar
nuke10–130.0121%6 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0416%4 Mar
mirage13–10-0.047%4 Mar
dust26–13-0.0114%4 Mar
dust25–130.037%3 Mar
dust213–100.059%3 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0311%3 Mar
dust216–14-0.0311%3 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0319%2 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0312%2 Mar
mirage7–13-0.038%2 Mar
dust213–90.0123%2 Mar
ancient14–160.0016%2 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0012%2 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →