Bukas

Bukas — CS2 Stats

NO76561198064656987[U:1:104391259]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,312Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,145Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,599Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#74410 of 257791 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,655 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,312 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,599 -5,153 25 Jun – 27 Sept · 33 days played
19,63926,393peak 26,39325 Jun27 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,655 +0 31 Aug – 27 Sept · 4 observations
1,6551,655peak 1,65531 Aug27 Sept
26,393Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,655Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-06-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,655
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 96 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,794 below peak (26,393)
  • -675 over 30 days · declining
  • -4,976 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,401 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 27 Sep 2026 and 27 Oct 2026.

Measured 27 Sep 2026 → 27 Oct 2026; previous 31 Aug 2026 → 27 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate42.1%50.9%
Shot accuracy16.1%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.651.09
Match win rate38.7%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBukasFACEITLevel 10 · 1,655 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER20,599 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,655csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning50
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–50–6Last 10044%Win rateWWLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility4.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.0
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time568ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 6 Jul →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 28 Jul →
359msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · anubis, 2 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 16 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
3–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 38% over 39
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3915–2438%-0.02
ancientB2412–1250%-0.01
nukeB136–746%-0.03
anubisS96–367%-0.03
cacheB63–350%-0.00
inferno—40–40%-0.02
dust2—32–167%-0.03
vertigo—10–10%-0.07
overpass—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 39). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

87,105Lifetime kills
0.65K/D
5,559Matches
38.7%Match win rate
42.1%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players
10,384MVPs
2,145Hours (in match)
4,030Bombs planted
988Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,043
AWP13,918
P2502,314
Knife2,083
Tec-91,489

Lifetime map wins

6,176inferno
3,402dust2
2,558nuke
1,232vertigo
997cbble
813train
232office
140lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

568Matches
53%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
76.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15055%0.9715.3
Ancient6760%1.0014.7
Inferno2846%1.0515.0
Anubis2560%1.0215.6
Overpass2572%1.1215.9
Nuke2450%0.9413.4
Dust21145%0.8013.1
Cache20%0.5811.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
586msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
5.86HE damage / grenade
3.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.7299 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.2787% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 39 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–60.0513%20 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0712%18 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0415%14 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0223%14 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0320%13 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0612%13 Aug →
mirage7–130.0615%13 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0023%3 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0213%3 Aug →
mirage13–80.0526%3 Aug →
cache13–50.0021%3 Aug →
mirage13–60.0230%3 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0216%3 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0621%3 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.090%2 Aug →
anubis13–70.0210%2 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0411%2 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.049%2 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0531%1 Aug →
ancient13–50.029%1 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.077%29 Jul →
mirage13–110.0223%29 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0419%29 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0933%28 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0510%25 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0228%25 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0513%23 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0611%22 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0210%21 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0216%21 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0533%20 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0211%19 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0223%18 Jul →
nuke0–13-0.050%18 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0625%18 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0312%17 Jul →
mirage5–8-0.0119%16 Jul →
nuke13–90.0211%16 Jul →
mirage13–80.0332%16 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.058%16 Jul →
dust25–13-0.1118%16 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0116%16 Jul →
mirage13–0-0.005%16 Jul →
mirage13–20.0621%16 Jul →
vertigo0–13-0.0710%15 Jul →
mirage3–130.0211%15 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0112%15 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0315%15 Jul →
dust213–50.0422%15 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0220%15 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0213%15 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0115%14 Jul →
ancient11–130.0610%14 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.007%12 Jul →
anubis13–80.0023%12 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.055%11 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0310%11 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0610%10 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0314%10 Jul →
ancient13–1-0.015%9 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.039%9 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.068%9 Jul →
mirage8–8-0.0323%9 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.029%9 Jul →
anubis16–13-0.0311%9 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0813%9 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0115%9 Jul →
ancient13–90.0116%6 Jul →
nuke13–10.0621%6 Jul →
anubis7–4-0.1124%5 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0318%5 Jul →
mirage13–00.028%5 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0010%4 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0217%2 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0518%2 Jul →
mirage13–90.0315%2 Jul →
mirage5–130.0112%2 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0710%1 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0610%1 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0321%30 Jun →
mirage13–80.0118%30 Jun →
cache12–120.0524%29 Jun →
overpass12–120.0414%29 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.048%29 Jun →
cache12–120.0412%29 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.018%29 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0211%29 Jun →
nuke15–15-0.0117%28 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0110%28 Jun →
ancient6–00.0113%28 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0414%27 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0612%26 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0310%26 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.038%26 Jun →
mirage6–130.0020%25 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0716%25 Jun →
nuke13–70.0114%25 Jun →
ancient13–40.0012%25 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0325%25 Jun →
cache13–8-0.0210%24 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.