Zura — CS2 Stats

NO76561198798609454[U:1:838343726]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,448Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,651Hours in CS69Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating27,262Top 10% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1107 of 31487 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,368 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=3,007), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	53.2%	52.0%
Shot accuracy	11.0%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.01	1.08
Match win rate	51.0%	48.8%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning58

Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateLWLLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0

Aggression7.7

Utility7.3

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning5.8

Utility7.3

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time508ms−61ms

first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 508ms

Headshot accuracy23.2%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–10

13–0Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 20infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	39	17–22	44%	-0.01
ancient	S	20	15–5	75%	-0.00
cache	A	14	8–6	57%	-0.01
anubis	S	12	8–4	67%	-0.00
inferno	D	7	2–5	29%	0.03
nuke	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01
dust2	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

123,096Lifetime kills

1.01K/D

7,166Matches

51.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

53.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

11.0%Shot accuracy

19,571MVPs

3,611Hours (in match)

9,422Bombs planted

1,607Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,084

M4A4 / M4A1-S24,455

Desert Eagle11,145

AWP10,395

P2000 / USP-S8,001

Glock-185,858

Knife2,355

Galil AR2,253

MP92,064

FAMAS2,001

Lifetime map wins

9,127inferno

5,963lake

5,090nuke

3,035dust2

2,770vertigo

1,340train

414cbble

90office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

977Matches

56%Win rate

1.02Avg K/D

72.1ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	230	54%	0.92	13.8
Ancient	168	55%	0.97	14.2
Inferno	87	64%	1.08	15.6
Nuke	77	61%	0.99	15.0
Anubis	56	66%	1.11	14.3
Overpass	53	53%	0.95	14.2
Dust2	23	30%	0.82	13.7
Cache	18	67%	0.91	12.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy

36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.2%Spray accuracy

86.6%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

503msReaction time

37.7%T opening success

44.5%CT opening success

0.78Enemies flashed / flash

14.4%Flash assists

7.34HE damage / grenade

15.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.6565% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	5–13	-0.03	32%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	23%	25 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	24%	25 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	20%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.04	16%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.00	14%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	31%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	20%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.06	28%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	27%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	16%	17 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	8%	17 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.04	18%	16 Aug →
cache	0–6	-0.10	40%	16 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.05	14%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	24%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.09	30%	14 Aug →
ancient	9–12	-0.02	23%	14 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.05	31%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	21%	13 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.03	29%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.01	24%	13 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	13%	13 Aug →
cache	11–7	-0.01	13%	11 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	23%	11 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	24%	10 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.05	38%	7 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	40%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	18%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	21%	3 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.02	21%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	26%	3 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	18%	2 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.02	38%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	17%	2 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.00	52%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	15%	2 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	28%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	13%	1 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.04	19%	1 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	13%	1 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.03	15%	31 Jul →
ancient	16–13	-0.00	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	26%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	31%	29 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	20%	23 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	32%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	32%	22 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	29%	22 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.01	24%	21 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.00	15%	21 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.01	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	45%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.00	0%	17 Jul →
anubis	12–7	-0.04	8%	16 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	29%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.04	28%	16 Jul →
mirage	5–8	-0.03	14%	16 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	24%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.10	28%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.04	17%	16 Jul →
eldorado	7–9	0.02	23%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.02	23%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.02	18%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.05	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	24%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.13	25%	12 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.07	16%	11 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	13%	11 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.09	29%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.00	31%	11 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	18%	11 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	36%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.06	36%	10 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.02	60%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.06	24%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.05	11%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.02	24%	10 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.11	21%	10 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	21%	10 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.11	20%	10 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	23%	9 Jul →
anubis	16–13	0.02	19%	9 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.06	14%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	25%	9 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.06	9%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.13	25%	8 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.04	30%	8 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.02	19%	8 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.08	28%	8 Jul →
train	12–12	0.08	35%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.08	26%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.01	18%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.03	38%	4 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	21%	3 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	19%	2 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.01	20%	2 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	20%	30 Jun →