timthebigone

timthebigone — CS2 Stats

US76561198059716436[U:1:99450708]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,229Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,606Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,766Purple band · top ~25.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,766 +2,198 31 Aug – 1 Nov · 20 days played
13,56816,741peak 16,74131 Aug1 Nov
Faceit ELO: 998 +0 3 Sept – 26 Sept · 2 observations
998998peak 9983 Sept26 Sept
16,741Peak Premier in tracked matches
998Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-07-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 975 below peak (16,741)
  • -45 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,234 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate39.9%43.8%44.8%4.9% short
Shot accuracy13.8%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.781.021.030.25 short
Match win rate40.3%44.7%45.2%4.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtimthebigoneFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,766 · Purple bandPEAK ELO998csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning43
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–53–2Last 10045%Win rateWLWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · +49ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility6.2
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch2.8

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning4.3
Utility6.2
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time609ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 20 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · dust2, 23 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 5 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 29 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 13nukeWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C176–1135%-0.03
mirageB168–850%-0.01
nukeD155–1033%-0.00
ancientA138–562%-0.02
anubisB137–654%-0.03
cacheC125–742%-0.02
infernoD93–633%-0.02
office—42–250%-0.05
train—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

112,861Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
6,516Matches
40.3%Match win rate
39.9%Headshot %
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
13,119MVPs
3,131Hours (in match)
6,239Bombs planted
2,186Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,754
AWP7,496
MAC-104,014
FAMAS2,398
Knife2,338

Lifetime map wins

10,398dust2
8,278inferno
4,682nuke
3,841vertigo
1,446train
491office
359cbble
105lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

941Matches
44%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
70.3ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis13045%0.7512.4
Mirage9743%0.7712.9
Ancient9050%0.8513.4
Vertigo8348%0.7412.9
Nuke7641%0.7714.1
Inferno6746%0.8913.3
Overpass4434%0.7213.1
Dust24340%0.6812.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
69.4%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
617msReaction time
44.8%T opening success
32.7%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
11.48HE damage / grenade
11.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.6519% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–9-0.0315%1 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0321%1 Nov →
mirage13–8-0.0118%1 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0522%1 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0519%1 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0113%28 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0714%28 Oct →
cache13–110.0214%28 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0110%24 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0119%24 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0526%23 Oct →
dust26–130.0122%23 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0426%19 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0910%19 Oct →
office10–13-0.0431%18 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0117%17 Oct →
nuke13–30.0319%16 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0310%10 Oct →
dust210–130.0112%10 Oct →
mirage13–110.0320%7 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0323%7 Oct →
mirage13–90.0115%6 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0214%6 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.1017%4 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0214%4 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0212%4 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0617%4 Oct →
anubis13–20.0419%4 Oct →
mirage13–90.0312%29 Sept →
mirage7–130.0321%29 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0713%26 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0614%26 Sept →
nuke2–130.0118%26 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0611%18 Sept →
anubis13–100.0023%18 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.059%18 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0211%18 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.075%16 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0810%15 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0015%10 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.037%10 Sept →
cache8–13-0.018%10 Sept →
mirage13–40.0214%8 Sept →
ancient13–50.0916%8 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0811%8 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.036%8 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.047%5 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0011%5 Sept →
anubis9–130.0214%5 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.019%4 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0316%4 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0513%4 Sept →
dust27–13-0.1123%4 Sept →
anubis4–130.0120%3 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0313%3 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0317%2 Sept →
nuke13–60.0519%2 Sept →
ancient13–60.0011%2 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0112%2 Sept →
nuke16–120.0815%1 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0317%1 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0115%31 Aug →
nuke15–150.0115%31 Aug →
office8–13-0.140%31 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0313%28 Aug →
cache11–13-0.069%28 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0615%28 Aug →
dust213–70.0817%23 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0533%23 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0212%23 Aug →
inferno13–60.1010%20 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0321%17 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0612%17 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0414%17 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0018%17 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0817%16 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0817%15 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.007%9 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0710%2 Aug →
cache10–13-0.044%2 Aug →
ancient13–80.0022%2 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0120%2 Aug →
cache13–50.0015%29 Jul →
dust213–1-0.0813%29 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0316%29 Jul →
dust27–13-0.052%26 Jul →
ancient13–30.0013%26 Jul →
office13–5-0.066%26 Jul →
office13–100.0315%26 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0113%24 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.047%23 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0417%22 Jul →
train13–100.0310%22 Jul →
nuke4–130.0811%22 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0224%22 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0417%22 Jul →
dust213–8-0.089%21 Jul →
nuke10–130.0819%19 Jul →
mirage10–130.046%19 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0410%18 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.