Lasse Eindryngen

Lasse Eindryngen — CS2 Stats

76561198057853121[U:1:97587393]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

673Tracked matches23%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,025Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,406Purple band · top ~22.8% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,406 +4,130 27 Jun – 29 Sept · 23 days played
12,27616,618peak 16,61827 Jun29 Sept
16,618Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-06-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 212 below peak (16,618)
  • +513 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,473 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,594 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches10——
Win rate40%——
K/D1.02——
Headshot %53%——

Measured 5 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate39.4%44.3%46.9%7.5% short
Shot accuracy17.8%11.9%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.031.080.12 short
Match win rate43.7%45.2%46.7%3.0% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLasse EindryngenPREMIER16,406 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning50
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39–59–2Last 10039%Win rateLLWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility2.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.3

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.0
Utility2.7
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time535ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–2 · poseidon, 7 Aug →
28%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · nuke, 7 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · train, 18 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 11 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2711–1641%0.04
anubisD123–925%0.01
cacheD123–925%0.03
nukeD113–827%0.05
ancientS96–367%0.03
mirageB63–350%0.04
vertigo—41–325%0.06
debris—32–167%0.15
poseidon—31–233%0.06
eldorado—21–150%0.08
train—20–20%0.00
boulder—21–150%-0.06
office—21–150%-0.07
sanctum—21–150%0.01
dust2—10–10%-0.00
italy—11–0100%0.05
overpass—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,527Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
4,687Matches
43.7%Match win rate
39.4%Headshot %
17.8%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Purple band
9,861MVPs
1,695Hours (in match)
5,386Bombs planted
1,033Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,549
AWP3,499
UMP-452,912
MP92,561
FAMAS2,330
P2502,165

Lifetime map wins

5,231inferno
2,995dust2
1,571vertigo
1,398train
1,275nuke
1,111cbble
655lake
562office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
537msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.23Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
12.53HE damage / grenade
1.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4036% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2301 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3685% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.0021%29 Sept →
anubis4–130.0320%28 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.028%25 Sept →
inferno13–110.0821%24 Sept →
cache6–130.0120%13 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0518%13 Sept →
eldorado9–40.1815%29 Aug →
debris9–20.2613%29 Aug →
train6–130.0212%29 Aug →
cache11–130.0514%29 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.019%29 Aug →
cache10–130.0313%27 Aug →
anubis13–40.1213%27 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0113%27 Aug →
mirage9–130.039%25 Aug →
vertigo7–130.0115%22 Aug →
italy13–100.0520%22 Aug →
vertigo8–8-0.0116%22 Aug →
poseidon2–9-0.0610%22 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0013%22 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0315%21 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0217%21 Aug →
inferno8–130.1015%20 Aug →
anubis13–80.048%20 Aug →
nuke5–130.0322%20 Aug →
inferno10–130.0514%20 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0213%19 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0115%19 Aug →
inferno13–100.1011%18 Aug →
inferno6–130.0218%18 Aug →
train1–13-0.0110%18 Aug →
ancient8–130.0513%9 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0812%9 Aug →
inferno11–130.0414%9 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0617%9 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0311%9 Aug →
inferno13–90.0212%9 Aug →
anubis13–100.0710%8 Aug →
nuke13–110.0821%8 Aug →
boulder13–4-0.0219%8 Aug →
office6–13-0.0913%8 Aug →
ancient5–130.0313%8 Aug →
nuke13–90.1028%7 Aug →
office13–11-0.0612%7 Aug →
eldorado3–9-0.029%7 Aug →
poseidon9–20.2721%7 Aug →
debris8–80.0717%7 Aug →
inferno11–130.0311%5 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.068%4 Aug →
ancient13–80.0616%4 Aug →
vertigo8–130.1215%3 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0326%31 Jul →
vertigo13–70.1011%31 Jul →
boulder5–13-0.107%28 Jul →
nuke6–130.0413%23 Jul →
nuke13–70.0114%23 Jul →
inferno13–80.0416%21 Jul →
inferno7–130.0312%19 Jul →
mirage3–130.0413%15 Jul →
mirage13–100.076%15 Jul →
inferno10–130.0816%14 Jul →
nuke11–130.1212%14 Jul →
inferno13–50.049%14 Jul →
mirage6–130.0418%14 Jul →
debris9–70.1428%14 Jul →
cache10–130.1020%13 Jul →
cache13–70.0415%13 Jul →
nuke8–130.0910%13 Jul →
inferno13–80.1116%13 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0219%13 Jul →
inferno3–130.0317%12 Jul →
nuke3–130.0219%12 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0214%12 Jul →
nuke1–130.0019%12 Jul →
anubis6–130.0712%12 Jul →
inferno3–130.037%12 Jul →
inferno13–20.1123%11 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.025%9 Jul →
nuke9–130.1114%9 Jul →
inferno13–100.039%9 Jul →
ancient13–60.0924%9 Jul →
cache1–130.0121%9 Jul →
inferno7–130.0410%7 Jul →
cache5–130.1215%7 Jul →
cache13–70.0713%7 Jul →
cache13–6-0.012%7 Jul →
overpass13–70.1010%5 Jul →
inferno13–70.0810%5 Jul →
inferno11–130.1017%5 Jul →
sanctum9–2-0.0013%5 Jul →
poseidon4–9-0.039%5 Jul →
anubis7–130.0317%2 Jul →
inferno11–130.0215%29 Jun →
inferno13–70.0812%29 Jun →
cache6–130.0423%29 Jun →
mirage13–70.1018%28 Jun →
ancient13–70.0812%28 Jun →
inferno13–110.0525%28 Jun →
sanctum7–90.036%27 Jun →
ancient13–80.0414%27 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.