marsyla

marsyla — CS2 Stats

SE76561198055913447[U:1:95647719]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

337Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,460Top 50% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#57174 of 227757 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 337 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 23 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,460 -3,123 23 Apr17 Sept · 27 days played
20,48624,999peak 24,99923 Apr17 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-04-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,539 below peak (24,999)
  • -204 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,451 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,540 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmarsylaFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,460 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning54
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45523Last 10045%Win rateWLLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.3
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.4
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time582ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 12–12 · cache, 17 Jun
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · cache, 12 May
375msFastest reaction time · 2–4 · cache, 3 May
13–1Biggest win · cache, 12 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
616In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 62% over 13dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC1661038%-0.00
nukeB168850%0.01
infernoC145936%-0.00
anubisA138562%0.01
ancientB136746%0.01
mirageB126650%0.00
dust2D113827%-0.02
overpass42250%0.00
alpine110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
572msReaction time
26.9%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
8.37HE damage / grenade
4.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4157 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.8921% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–6-0.0217%25 Aug
cache10–13-0.0131%25 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0824%25 Aug
nuke6–130.0229%24 Aug
ancient13–110.0217%24 Aug
dust211–13-0.0124%23 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0120%23 Aug
dust213–5-0.0521%23 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0127%23 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0516%12 Aug
mirage10–130.0119%12 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0327%12 Aug
cache10–13-0.0613%12 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0310%11 Aug
inferno13–60.0118%11 Aug
cache10–130.0014%11 Aug
dust213–80.0120%11 Aug
nuke12–120.0539%8 Aug
nuke10–130.0118%7 Aug
mirage9–130.0022%5 Aug
nuke8–130.0025%5 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0331%2 Aug
cache7–1-0.058%2 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0118%2 Aug
cache10–130.0116%30 Jul
ancient2–130.0119%30 Jul
anubis13–100.0321%30 Jul
nuke13–30.0112%29 Jul
ancient11–130.0527%29 Jul
inferno13–30.0517%29 Jul
ancient13–90.0117%27 Jul
anubis13–80.0623%27 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1017%27 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0129%12 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0127%12 Jul
ancient13–90.0422%12 Jul
dust210–13-0.0326%9 Jul
cache5–13-0.0714%9 Jul
ancient13–50.0321%9 Jul
nuke13–80.0626%9 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0722%9 Jul
cache13–11-0.0428%8 Jul
inferno13–30.0823%6 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0114%6 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0714%6 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0015%30 Jun
ancient8–130.0029%30 Jun
inferno14–160.0314%29 Jun
anubis13–110.0513%23 Jun
mirage13–80.0227%23 Jun
dust29–13-0.0416%22 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0117%22 Jun
dust26–13-0.0817%22 Jun
inferno11–130.019%21 Jun
mirage13–50.0421%21 Jun
dust24–130.0129%21 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0314%18 Jun
dust211–130.0011%18 Jun
anubis11–130.1122%18 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0824%18 Jun
nuke13–110.0426%18 Jun
cache12–120.1132%17 Jun
overpass13–60.0426%16 Jun
mirage11–130.0219%16 Jun
dust213–70.0221%14 Jun
nuke13–30.0729%14 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0619%14 Jun
inferno10–130.0119%14 Jun
nuke11–130.0315%11 Jun
inferno10–130.0216%11 Jun
dust214–160.0127%10 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0522%10 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0112%8 Jun
dust211–13-0.0210%8 Jun
anubis13–60.0230%8 Jun
nuke13–80.0436%20 May
ancient16–130.0421%20 May
mirage13–30.0826%17 May
inferno13–70.0830%14 May
overpass8–13-0.0133%13 May
inferno3–13-0.0721%13 May
cache13–40.0825%13 May
overpass13–90.0226%12 May
cache13–10.0744%12 May
cache9–13-0.0410%8 May
overpass8–13-0.0330%8 May
nuke10–13-0.0312%8 May
anubis13–7-0.027%8 May
nuke13–8-0.0120%8 May
cache11–13-0.0020%3 May
cache2–4-0.0433%3 May
cache13–80.0218%29 Apr
cache5–13-0.0525%29 Apr
alpine13–8-0.0027%29 Apr
cache13–60.0213%29 Apr
nuke11–130.0119%26 Apr
mirage13–110.0315%26 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0218%25 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0415%25 Apr
mirage13–40.0226%23 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →