Allanlind83

Allanlind83 — CS2 Stats

DK76561198054569611[U:1:94303883]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,321Tracked matches27%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,491Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 3 · 793 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (34 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 793 → 793
+6Tracked matches · now 2,321
−6.7ppWin rate · 33.3% → 26.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,063 +378 6 Jan – 14 Jan · 2 days played
3,6854,063peak 4,0636 Jan14 Jan
Faceit ELO: 793 +0 3 Sept – 23 Sept · 3 observations
793793peak 7933 Sept23 Sept
4,063Peak Premier in tracked matches
793Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-01-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 793
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 108 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches61+5
Win rate17%0%+17pp
K/D0.500.88−0.38
Headshot %53%60%−7pp

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 27 Oct 2026; previous 1 Sep 2026 → 23 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate39.2%41.8%42.7%3.5% short
Shot accuracy13.5%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.730.980.990.26 short
Match win rate37.4%43.3%43.9%6.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAllanlind83FACEITLevel 3 · 793 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO793csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning38
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD29–66–5Last 10029%Win rateLLWLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 663ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 20

  • 4–16 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility4.2
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch2.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 665ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning3.8
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time666ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 690ms → last ⅓ avg 666ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+5.6%
first ⅓ avg 12.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · vertigo, 10 Jan →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · train, 23 Mar →
453msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 11 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 56% over 9nukeWeakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD3810–2826%-0.05
ancientD186–1233%-0.04
nukeD174–1324%-0.05
vertigoA95–456%-0.01
anubisD82–625%-0.04
overpass—42–250%0.00
mirage—30–30%-0.03
cache—10–10%-0.06
train—10–10%0.05
alpine—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,439Lifetime kills
0.73K/D
3,914Matches
37.4%Match win rate
39.2%Headshot %
13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
6,350MVPs
1,491Hours (in match)
1,689Bombs planted
519Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,330
AUG4,439
AWP2,979
MAC-102,176
MP91,916
SG 5531,745

Lifetime map wins

11,201inferno
6,435nuke
3,913vertigo
1,643dust2
1,536cbble
429train
83office
8lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

604Matches
49%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
64.1ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo13062%0.8012.0
Inferno11741%0.8011.9
Nuke10960%0.9111.6
Ancient9140%0.8012.0
Mirage3244%0.7711.9
Anubis3037%0.5510.3
Dust22245%0.6711.1
Overpass1662%0.8610.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
28.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.3%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
665msReaction time
41.1%T opening success
32.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
5.97HE damage / grenade
2.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.9899 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.4261% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–130.0119%12 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0517%12 Oct →
nuke9–2-0.0814%12 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0514%30 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0622%30 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0010%23 Sept →
ancient9–130.0120%16 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0733%25 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0324%14 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0625%14 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0618%7 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0412%4 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0115%4 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0415%4 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0613%4 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0713%4 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0615%4 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.118%25 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0221%25 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0617%22 May →
overpass13–80.0314%6 May →
anubis8–13-0.0315%8 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0116%8 Apr →
overpass13–2-0.0112%8 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.069%8 Apr →
anubis4–13-0.0917%8 Apr →
ancient2–13-0.115%8 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0722%8 Apr →
inferno16–13-0.0514%8 Apr →
inferno4–9-0.0621%8 Apr →
inferno7–9-0.0541%8 Apr →
train6–130.0543%23 Mar →
inferno16–120.0223%23 Feb →
ancient1–8-0.028%23 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0615%23 Feb →
ancient11–5-0.0511%23 Feb →
vertigo22–19-0.0018%21 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.044%21 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0521%21 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0917%21 Feb →
inferno8–8-0.055%19 Feb →
inferno4–9-0.0718%19 Feb →
inferno4–9-0.2118%16 Feb →
inferno6–130.009%15 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.065%15 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.0120%13 Feb →
vertigo5–9-0.0221%12 Feb →
inferno4–9-0.0923%12 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.078%11 Feb →
anubis13–1-0.0125%11 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0619%11 Feb →
anubis9–13-0.055%11 Feb →
anubis13–8-0.0519%11 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0833%11 Feb →
vertigo13–8-0.0115%11 Feb →
inferno9–60.0519%11 Feb →
inferno9–6-0.006%11 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0510%5 Feb →
ancient13–6-0.0014%3 Feb →
inferno15–15-0.0314%29 Jan →
vertigo12–160.0014%27 Jan →
anubis7–13-0.0222%27 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.048%27 Jan →
vertigo13–11-0.0521%27 Jan →
ancient8–13-0.0512%27 Jan →
vertigo9–13-0.0719%27 Jan →
inferno8–8-0.1118%27 Jan →
inferno8–8-0.0411%27 Jan →
ancient16–140.0311%24 Jan →
inferno9–13-0.034%23 Jan →
nuke5–13-0.083%23 Jan →
inferno1–13-0.030%23 Jan →
ancient13–7-0.0415%22 Jan →
nuke11–130.0310%22 Jan →
alpine2–13-0.0820%22 Jan →
nuke5–13-0.0417%21 Jan →
ancient9–13-0.0317%21 Jan →
vertigo13–5-0.0425%21 Jan →
inferno3–130.017%21 Jan →
inferno4–9-0.0512%14 Jan →
inferno8–8-0.0418%14 Jan →
nuke4–12-0.0419%14 Jan →
ancient13–7-0.0520%14 Jan →
inferno9–60.0218%14 Jan →
inferno2–9-0.089%14 Jan →
inferno6–9-0.135%14 Jan →
inferno9–7-0.0512%13 Jan →
inferno4–9-0.166%13 Jan →
inferno9–2-0.030%12 Jan →
vertigo13–40.1016%10 Jan →
vertigo5–130.0112%9 Jan →
nuke3–130.0011%9 Jan →
inferno9–70.0111%8 Jan →
inferno4–9-0.0818%8 Jan →
nuke13–10-0.057%6 Jan →
overpass5–13-0.0117%6 Jan →
inferno5–9-0.0818%6 Jan →
inferno9–30.047%6 Jan →
inferno7–9-0.0412%6 Jan →
mirage5–13-0.0221%5 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.