Rekylvand

Rekylvand — CS2 Stats

DK76561198059027028[U:1:98761300]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,876Tracked matches38%Win rate2022Tracked since
3,639Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating8,401Light Blue band · top ~62.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 1,113 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,876 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 13 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,401 -122 25 Jul22 Sept · 18 days played
6,2478,547peak 8,54725 Jul22 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,113 +0 1 Sept22 Sept · 4 observations
1,1131,113peak 1,1131 Sept22 Sept
8,978Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,113Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-07-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,113
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 88 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 146 below peak (8,547)
  • +980 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 1,599 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,396), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate34.0%41.9%42.7%8.7% short
Shot accuracy4.5%12.2%11.3%6.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.910.980.990.08 short
Match win rate39.3%43.3%43.9%4.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRekylvandFACEITLevel 3 · 1,113 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER8,401 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO1,113csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning54
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD30673Last 10030%Win rateLWWLWLLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.6pp headshot accuracy · +70ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim3.7
Utility5.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 57% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning5.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics1.5
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time609ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy10.8%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 11.6% → last ⅓ avg 10.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 29 Aug
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 14 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 21 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 25 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 18overpassWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientD2271532%-0.03
infernoA1810856%-0.02
nukeC1771041%0.02
anubisD1321115%-0.02
cacheD123925%0.00
vertigoD61517%-0.03
overpassD6060%-0.04
train3030%-0.01
mirage2020%-0.06
eldorado1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

66,392Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
4,382Matches
39.3%Match win rate
34.0%Headshot %
4.5%Shot accuracy
8,469MVPs
1,790Hours (in match)
4,791Bombs planted
1,148Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,350
AWP7,462
XM10145,577
MP93,097
MAC-102,473

Lifetime map wins

9,919nuke
9,528inferno
6,753vertigo
1,199train
699dust2
85office
74italy
64cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

451Matches
49%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
70.5ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke9267%1.1513.1
Inferno7540%1.0413.7
Ancient6045%0.9213.3
Anubis4740%0.8612.7
Vertigo4163%0.9713.3
Overpass2642%0.8713.4
Train2152%1.1113.6
Cache650%1.0813.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.8%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
56.6%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
595msReaction time
40.6%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
8.30HE damage / grenade
8.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2263° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.7714% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo0–9-0.100%22 Sept
inferno13–50.0413%21 Sept
anubis13–9-0.075%21 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0113%21 Sept
ancient13–11-0.037%21 Sept
inferno11–130.027%21 Sept
vertigo3–13-0.066%12 Sept
cache5–13-0.039%12 Sept
overpass12–12-0.037%12 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0410%12 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0413%12 Sept
ancient13–10-0.048%12 Sept
inferno5–13-0.074%12 Sept
cache10–13-0.0014%10 Sept
nuke13–20.078%10 Sept
ancient9–13-0.014%10 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0515%10 Sept
overpass5–13-0.0422%9 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0320%5 Sept
inferno13–90.0815%4 Sept
ancient8–130.0116%4 Sept
ancient11–130.0011%4 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0411%4 Sept
nuke16–14-0.017%3 Sept
anubis8–130.077%3 Sept
inferno13–2-0.0017%3 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0310%1 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0420%1 Sept
anubis6–13-0.057%31 Aug
cache13–80.055%29 Aug
nuke13–50.1919%29 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0615%29 Aug
mirage6–13-0.1011%29 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0412%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.017%26 Aug
ancient9–2-0.0113%26 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0827%26 Aug
nuke14–16-0.025%25 Aug
nuke13–80.039%25 Aug
nuke6–130.0110%24 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0014%14 Aug
inferno13–70.016%14 Aug
ancient13–40.0931%14 Aug
inferno13–70.0221%14 Aug
cache9–13-0.029%14 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0317%10 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0814%10 Aug
overpass2–13-0.077%7 Aug
train0–8-0.100%7 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0414%7 Aug
cache5–13-0.0521%7 Aug
vertigo3–130.004%7 Aug
ancient16–120.016%7 Aug
nuke13–100.096%7 Aug
nuke11–130.089%7 Aug
ancient7–130.0615%7 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0513%4 Aug
vertigo1–13-0.0713%4 Aug
ancient8–13-0.095%4 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0614%4 Aug
ancient13–9-0.037%4 Aug
anubis4–130.0317%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.027%4 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0510%4 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0913%1 Aug
cache3–13-0.012%1 Aug
train5–13-0.010%30 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0121%30 Jul
inferno13–9-0.036%30 Jul
anubis9–130.0117%30 Jul
anubis10–130.0511%30 Jul
vertigo8–80.0428%29 Jul
ancient6–13-0.090%25 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0519%25 Jul
overpass10–13-0.0616%25 Jul
cache7–130.0218%25 Jul
cache8–13-0.0010%25 Jul
inferno13–7-0.035%25 Jul
inferno13–00.0012%25 Jul
ancient2–13-0.020%25 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0719%25 Jul
overpass6–13-0.0110%21 Jul
inferno6–13-0.090%21 Jul
nuke3–130.0216%21 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0916%21 Jul
eldorado8–80.015%21 Jul
ancient3–13-0.083%21 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0021%21 Jul
cache16–140.079%21 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0822%20 Jul
inferno13–80.0019%20 Jul
cache13–10-0.006%20 Jul
nuke13–90.055%17 Jul
vertigo13–100.0218%15 Jul
anubis10–13-0.088%15 Jul
nuke4–130.019%15 Jul
overpass7–13-0.0515%15 Jul
train5–130.076%15 Jul
cache4–130.0213%15 Jul
nuke13–10-0.053%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →