⅁NINNƎH

⅁NINNƎH — CS2 Stats

DK76561199103554877[U:1:1143289149]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,998Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,800Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating9,366Light Blue band · top ~57.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 920 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 3 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,366 +903 3 Jul19 Sept · 24 days played
8,46311,291peak 11,2913 Jul19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 920 +0 30 Aug3 Sept · 3 observations
920920peak 92030 Aug3 Sept
11,660Peak Premier in tracked matches
920Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-07-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 920
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 131 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,925 below peak (11,291)
  • -818 over 30 days · declining
  • +903 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 634 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,396), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate49.4%41.9%42.7%above
Shot accuracy9.6%12.2%11.3%1.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.350.980.99above
Match win rate42.2%43.3%43.9%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG⅁NINNƎHFACEITLevel 3 · 920 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER9,366 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO920csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning49
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44542Last 10044%Win rateWWLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility6.2
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch4.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.9
Utility6.2
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time628ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 628ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–0 · inferno, 25 Jul
38%Best headshot accuracy · 6–2 · inferno, 18 Sept
469msFastest reaction time · 6–2 · inferno, 18 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 25 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA27151256%0.02
infernoC23101343%0.04
ancientC2291341%0.01
anubisD1431121%0.01
cacheD72529%-0.02
dust2S54180%0.00
mirage1010%-0.03
overpass110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

92,702Lifetime kills
1.35K/D · Top 10% of Level 3 players
3,951Matches
42.2%Match win rate
49.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
9.6%Shot accuracy
9,214MVPs
1,799Hours (in match)
4,510Bombs planted
1,194Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,282
AUG5,976
AWP5,213
SG 5534,912
P901,856

Lifetime map wins

11,957nuke
9,459inferno
3,317vertigo
1,193dust2
651train
38lake
31office
19assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

624Matches
48%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
75.6ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke15062%1.2716.6
Inferno13553%1.2516.6
Ancient10640%1.0814.9
Anubis5340%1.0415.1
Vertigo4439%1.0815.9
Dust22241%0.8911.4
Mirage2124%1.1614.0
Train1942%1.1014.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.1%Spray accuracy
71.8%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
625msReaction time
41.4%T opening success
31.5%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
7.43HE damage / grenade
6.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 31.5301% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.028%19 Sept
nuke13–50.0617%19 Sept
anubis1–13-0.0120%19 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0312%18 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0130%18 Sept
inferno6–2-0.0238%18 Sept
anubis7–130.0411%18 Sept
nuke9–130.0526%17 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0413%17 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0519%17 Sept
inferno11–130.0125%17 Sept
nuke13–5-0.033%9 Sept
inferno13–100.0121%9 Sept
ancient13–40.0926%9 Sept
anubis11–130.0126%4 Sept
inferno13–50.0219%4 Sept
inferno7–130.0420%4 Sept
ancient5–130.1114%4 Sept
dust213–50.0817%4 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0215%4 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0315%4 Sept
nuke13–50.0518%4 Sept
nuke16–140.0118%3 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0315%3 Sept
inferno13–2-0.0232%3 Sept
dust213–20.0514%3 Sept
nuke14–16-0.0517%25 Aug
nuke13–80.0323%25 Aug
inferno10–130.0228%25 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0225%25 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0112%25 Aug
ancient3–50.0229%25 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0217%25 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0311%18 Aug
dust24–13-0.0827%17 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0110%15 Aug
nuke6–130.0017%11 Aug
anubis13–80.0214%8 Aug
ancient10–00.094%8 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0517%8 Aug
ancient8–130.0410%8 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0515%8 Aug
nuke11–130.0219%8 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0133%8 Aug
anubis9–130.0419%8 Aug
anubis8–130.0115%6 Aug
inferno9–130.0229%6 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0813%6 Aug
inferno13–30.1326%6 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0418%27 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0017%27 Jul
ancient13–100.0623%27 Jul
nuke13–8-0.025%26 Jul
cache10–13-0.0323%26 Jul
nuke10–13-0.028%26 Jul
nuke13–100.0714%26 Jul
anubis13–50.0513%26 Jul
cache8–13-0.0226%25 Jul
inferno13–70.0417%25 Jul
inferno13–00.2129%25 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0019%25 Jul
ancient4–130.0217%25 Jul
inferno13–90.1019%25 Jul
ancient2–13-0.097%24 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0321%24 Jul
cache3–13-0.0815%24 Jul
anubis9–130.0632%19 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0117%19 Jul
nuke13–50.046%11 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0411%11 Jul
cache6–130.0119%11 Jul
nuke9–130.0429%11 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0211%11 Jul
anubis13–20.0314%11 Jul
ancient16–120.0428%11 Jul
inferno7–130.0218%11 Jul
ancient13–30.0828%11 Jul
cache11–130.029%10 Jul
anubis6–130.0613%10 Jul
inferno10–13-0.017%10 Jul
cache13–6-0.0516%10 Jul
anubis8–13-0.037%10 Jul
inferno13–80.1024%10 Jul
inferno4–130.0015%10 Jul
ancient11–130.0210%9 Jul
inferno7–130.1313%9 Jul
ancient15–150.0311%9 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0521%9 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0010%9 Jul
dust213–6-0.029%9 Jul
nuke7–130.036%9 Jul
nuke13–70.0417%9 Jul
dust213–8-0.0125%9 Jul
nuke13–40.1419%6 Jul
nuke7–130.0624%6 Jul
inferno9–130.0719%5 Jul
nuke13–30.1518%5 Jul
ancient13–110.0031%5 Jul
inferno9–50.1815%3 Jul
overpass13–6-0.029%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →