Slowley

Slowley — CS2 Stats

76561198053771784[U:1:93506056]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,366Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,359Hours in CS63Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,274Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#91170 of 247935 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,012 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,274 -424 2 Sept – 1 Oct · 16 days played
17,42120,551peak 20,5512 Sept1 Oct
21,168Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,012Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
17Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,012
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 488 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,277 below peak (20,551)
  • -424 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 726 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,745), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate50.2%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy13.0%13.0%13.3%meets
Kill/death ratio0.861.061.070.21 short
Match win rate42.7%46.3%46.9%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSlowleyFACEITLevel 8 · 2,012 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,274 · Purple bandPEAK ELO2,012csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning64
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateLWLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.0
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time487ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 500ms → last ⅓ avg 487ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%−4.8%
first ⅓ avg 28.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 1 Oct →
51%Best headshot accuracy · 16–14 · inferno, 15 Sept →
219msFastest reaction time · 4–0 · nuke, 29 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 61% over 23anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2314–961%0.03
infernoA1811–761%0.01
mirageA1811–761%0.02
cacheC145–936%0.02
nukeC146–843%0.03
anubisD103–730%-0.00
ancient—20–20%0.05
train—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

205,210Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
8,632Matches
42.7%Match win rate
50.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
13.0%Shot accuracy
22,144MVPs
3,847Hours (in match)
3,511Bombs planted
1,654Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4768,124
AWP54,516
Knife3,395
MP92,816
SSG 082,169
MAC-102,049

Lifetime map wins

15,019dust2
10,576inferno
4,512nuke
3,205train
2,735cbble
1,300vertigo
255office
87lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,518Matches
50%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
81.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26648%1.0816.4
Dust217545%1.1116.8
Inferno15145%1.0516.3
Anubis11350%1.0717.4
Ancient9449%1.0617.1
Nuke6847%1.2519.2
Overpass4461%1.1319.7
Train4260%1.3117.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
492msReaction time
55.8%T opening success
57.2%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
10.80HE damage / grenade
8.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–11-0.090%1 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0117%1 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0124%1 Oct →
cache13–160.0632%1 Oct →
inferno6–130.0122%1 Oct →
inferno13–80.0320%1 Oct →
inferno13–20.1425%1 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0113%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0731%1 Oct →
dust213–60.1120%1 Oct →
cache6–130.0123%1 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0035%30 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0314%30 Sept →
inferno16–140.0036%30 Sept →
nuke13–70.0226%30 Sept →
cache13–80.0524%30 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0132%30 Sept →
nuke12–160.0024%30 Sept →
cache0–13-0.0024%29 Sept →
dust20–13-0.024%29 Sept →
dust27–130.0636%29 Sept →
mirage10–130.1323%29 Sept →
nuke2–130.0225%29 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0124%29 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0627%29 Sept →
nuke4–00.0533%29 Sept →
dust213–110.0025%29 Sept →
nuke13–90.0629%28 Sept →
mirage13–60.0820%28 Sept →
dust213–40.0134%28 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0522%28 Sept →
cache13–60.1020%28 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0122%28 Sept →
train3–130.0230%27 Sept →
mirage13–60.0426%27 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0915%27 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0233%27 Sept →
inferno15–150.0222%27 Sept →
inferno16–140.0225%27 Sept →
cache13–80.0729%27 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0132%26 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0129%26 Sept →
nuke8–130.0426%25 Sept →
anubis13–100.0615%25 Sept →
dust216–120.0718%25 Sept →
cache13–110.0532%25 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0130%25 Sept →
dust213–90.0229%25 Sept →
nuke13–70.1340%25 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.0623%25 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0231%25 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0123%25 Sept →
anubis10–130.0128%16 Sept →
mirage13–30.0532%16 Sept →
nuke11–130.0735%16 Sept →
inferno16–140.0551%15 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0344%15 Sept →
dust213–40.0617%15 Sept →
inferno13–30.0340%14 Sept →
dust210–130.0429%14 Sept →
cache7–130.0346%14 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0023%14 Sept →
dust213–60.0727%14 Sept →
dust213–110.0316%9 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0428%8 Sept →
mirage13–90.0427%8 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0119%6 Sept →
ancient8–130.1028%6 Sept →
anubis6–130.0431%6 Sept →
mirage9–130.0434%6 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0419%6 Sept →
cache13–50.0531%6 Sept →
mirage13–70.0827%6 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0315%6 Sept →
mirage13–70.0140%5 Sept →
inferno13–110.0436%5 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0418%5 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0633%5 Sept →
dust213–30.1330%5 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.078%5 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0144%5 Sept →
anubis13–50.0623%5 Sept →
mirage13–40.0331%5 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0243%5 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0330%5 Sept →
mirage13–70.0516%5 Sept →
mirage13–50.0526%4 Sept →
dust213–90.0726%4 Sept →
nuke14–160.0716%4 Sept →
mirage4–130.0422%3 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0532%3 Sept →
dust27–130.0130%3 Sept →
dust213–60.0729%2 Sept →
inferno13–40.0738%2 Sept →
inferno13–100.0225%2 Sept →
inferno7–130.0236%2 Sept →
nuke13–40.0332%2 Sept →
dust213–110.0741%2 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0233%2 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0324%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.