czsteaven

czsteaven — CS2 Stats

CZ76561199137106742[U:1:1176841014]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,513Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,625Hours in CS54Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating22,523Top 25% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#47266 of 247939 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,721 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,523 +3,265 22 Jul – 1 Oct · 29 days played
18,47922,523peak 22,52322 Jul1 Oct
22,936Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,721Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-07-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,721
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 30 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,523
  • +1,657 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,477 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches150——
Win rate57%——
K/D0.82——
Headshot %49%——

Measured 28 Aug 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,336), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.2%48.2%50.9%2.7% short
Shot accuracy6.3%13.3%13.8%7.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.071.090.22 short
Match win rate46.6%46.9%48.4%1.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGczsteavenFACEITLevel 9 · 1,721 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,523 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,721csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning55
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–44Last 10056%Win rateLWWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.9pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.7
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.8

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.5
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time586ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 4–5 · anubis, 3 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · nuke, 29 Sept →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 14 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 28 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
13–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 12anubisWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2315–865%-0.01
cacheB179–853%0.01
mirageC167–944%-0.02
infernoS129–375%-0.00
anubisC125–742%0.00
nukeA117–464%-0.01
ancientB84–450%0.01
train—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,733Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
3,756Matches
46.6%Match win rate
48.2%Headshot %
6.3%Shot accuracy
8,615MVPs
3,568Hours (in match)
4,303Bombs planted
811Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,947
AWP7,374
MAC-101,616
Knife1,582
FAMAS1,542
MP91,409

Lifetime map wins

5,753inferno
4,768dust2
1,939nuke
1,188vertigo
837train
569cbble
69office
28lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

901Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
77.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20750%0.9815.3
Dust213849%1.0015.6
Inferno13446%0.8814.5
Ancient10850%0.9314.7
Anubis10255%0.9314.6
Nuke4149%0.9715.7
Overpass3262%0.9414.8
Cache3063%1.0514.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
577msReaction time
49.9%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
9.69HE damage / grenade
7.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.4815% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.058%1 Oct →
inferno13–80.0617%1 Oct →
inferno13–20.0416%1 Oct →
inferno13–70.0316%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0125%1 Oct →
dust213–60.0229%1 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0516%1 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0415%30 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.038%30 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0321%30 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0515%30 Sept →
cache13–80.1118%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0222%29 Sept →
nuke4–00.0650%29 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0616%29 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0523%28 Sept →
mirage13–60.0125%28 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0214%28 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0413%28 Sept →
anubis11–130.0623%28 Sept →
train3–13-0.0625%27 Sept →
mirage13–60.0717%27 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0510%26 Sept →
mirage16–140.0020%25 Sept →
nuke8–130.0225%25 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.058%25 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0013%25 Sept →
cache13–110.0013%25 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0514%25 Sept →
dust213–90.0621%25 Sept →
anubis16–130.0118%23 Sept →
ancient13–70.1318%23 Sept →
anubis9–130.0415%23 Sept →
cache8–130.000%22 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0711%16 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0013%15 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0333%15 Sept →
dust213–40.1118%15 Sept →
inferno13–30.0311%14 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0023%14 Sept →
cache7–130.0813%14 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0111%11 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0229%9 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0210%9 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0224%9 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0629%8 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0119%8 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0415%8 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.1036%8 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.098%5 Sept →
nuke13–60.0218%3 Sept →
anubis4–50.1442%3 Sept →
nuke13–40.0013%2 Sept →
dust213–110.0115%2 Sept →
cache7–130.0119%2 Sept →
nuke9–130.0327%2 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.029%2 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0417%1 Sept →
dust213–16-0.026%1 Sept →
ancient11–130.0212%30 Aug →
ancient13–80.0210%30 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0121%30 Aug →
cache13–30.0320%29 Aug →
cache13–60.0721%29 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0815%29 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0322%29 Aug →
mirage13–90.0216%29 Aug →
dust213–7-0.024%25 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0615%25 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0920%22 Aug →
cache13–70.0313%22 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0913%22 Aug →
dust213–110.0216%21 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.037%21 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0326%19 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0211%16 Aug →
mirage13–60.0818%16 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.028%15 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0214%14 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0524%12 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0319%12 Aug →
inferno13–110.0728%12 Aug →
ancient13–70.0111%8 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0724%8 Aug →
cache13–70.0113%8 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0213%8 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0223%8 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0111%4 Aug →
anubis13–40.0620%29 Jul →
cache8–130.0124%29 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0110%29 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0615%29 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0514%28 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0517%28 Jul →
nuke13–00.000%28 Jul →
anubis13–60.0026%28 Jul →
dust213–110.0914%24 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0414%23 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.009%22 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0015%22 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.