Rankaisija

Rankaisija — CS2 Stats

FI76561198051115536[U:1:90849808]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,070Tracked matches38%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,038Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating18,507Purple band · top ~14.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 940 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,507 -1,493 8 Aug – 25 Oct · 11 days played
17,58920,000peak 20,0008 Aug25 Oct
Faceit ELO: 940 +0 5 Sept – 20 Sept · 2 observations
940940peak 9405 Sept20 Sept
20,199Peak Premier in tracked matches
940Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-07-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 940
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 111 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,493 below peak (20,000)
  • -896 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,493 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,493 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,911), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate43.9%42.7%43.8%meets
Shot accuracy13.9%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.160.991.02above
Match win rate45.0%43.9%44.7%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRankaisijaFACEITLevel 4 · 940 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,507 · Purple bandPEAK ELO940csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning41
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–56–4Last 10040%Win rateLLLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +131ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 689ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 707ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.2
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch6.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.1
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time631ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 28 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · boulder, 31 Jul →
469msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 14 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 6 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 54% over 13anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC167–944%-0.01
infernoC146–843%-0.03
dust2B137–654%-0.03
cacheD124–833%-0.01
ancientD113–827%-0.03
nukeB105–550%-0.02
anubisD71–614%-0.02
vertigoD51–420%0.02
train—42–250%-0.00
office—21–150%-0.05
fachwerk—21–150%-0.01
boulder—20–20%-0.05
shelter—11–0100%0.06
italy—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,658Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
3,053Matches
45.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
43.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
6,895MVPs
1,240Hours (in match)
2,185Bombs planted
849Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,448
AWP6,635
SSG 081,511
P901,501
P2501,447
MP91,320

Lifetime map wins

6,228inferno
3,549nuke
2,744dust2
709vertigo
666train
285cbble
176office
125italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

51Matches
59%Win rate
1.38Avg K/D
89.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21233%1.2515.3
Mirage1173%1.2817.6
Inferno862%1.5518.8
Anubis560%0.8515.2
Ancient475%1.8216.5
Nuke3100%2.2021.7
Vertigo10%0.9416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.2%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
632msReaction time
56.2%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
10.2%Flash assists
6.27HE damage / grenade
3.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.8175 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–13-0.0721%13 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.120%13 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0519%13 Nov →
cache13–50.0840%6 Nov →
vertigo13–10.0830%6 Nov →
train8–130.0035%6 Nov →
dust213–4-0.0721%25 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0514%24 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0617%24 Oct →
mirage13–100.0122%24 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0731%24 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0129%24 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0616%23 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0022%23 Oct →
dust24–130.0536%23 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0417%9 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0012%9 Oct →
mirage13–110.0124%9 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0517%9 Oct →
inferno13–20.0241%3 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0020%3 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0540%1 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0525%1 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.1013%26 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0337%26 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0322%26 Sept →
office10–13-0.0738%25 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0726%25 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0831%25 Sept →
nuke16–12-0.0324%25 Sept →
nuke13–110.0215%24 Sept →
mirage11–130.0223%4 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0034%4 Sept →
cache13–20.0236%4 Sept →
shelter13–90.0627%4 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0326%4 Sept →
train3–13-0.0529%4 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0723%4 Sept →
ancient13–70.0421%4 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0536%4 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0522%4 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0943%29 Aug →
fachwerk13–20.0718%29 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0927%29 Aug →
nuke13–60.1039%28 Aug →
cache13–100.0724%28 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0430%28 Aug →
mirage8–130.0525%28 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0311%28 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0537%27 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0222%27 Aug →
vertigo7–130.0429%21 Aug →
mirage11–130.0427%21 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0335%21 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0517%16 Aug →
office13–4-0.0229%16 Aug →
boulder9–13-0.0120%14 Aug →
inferno8–130.0023%14 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0227%14 Aug →
dust27–13-0.1024%14 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0144%14 Aug →
train13–100.0136%14 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0629%14 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0636%14 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0021%14 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0635%13 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0240%13 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0625%13 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0118%8 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0129%8 Aug →
ancient9–130.0535%8 Aug →
mirage13–80.029%8 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0729%8 Aug →
anubis13–80.0127%8 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0025%8 Aug →
mirage13–30.0625%8 Aug →
italy13–60.0137%8 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0420%7 Aug →
train13–10.0325%7 Aug →
dust26–130.0149%7 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0526%7 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0424%7 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0518%7 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0523%7 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0320%1 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0423%1 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0330%1 Aug →
fachwerk4–13-0.099%1 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0326%1 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0037%31 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0722%31 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0133%31 Jul →
boulder3–13-0.0950%31 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0430%31 Jul →
vertigo5–13-0.1119%31 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0017%31 Jul →
inferno12–120.0338%31 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0323%31 Jul →
dust213–80.0426%31 Jul →
inferno10–10.0350%31 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.