aamand

aamand — CS2 Stats

GE76561198050949773[U:1:90684045]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,169Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,855Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+8Tracked matches · now 1,169
−14.3ppWin rate · 46.4% → 32.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 58 days played since 29 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,578 +1,527 29 Dec20 Jun · 28 days played
21,34125,359peak 25,35929 Dec20 Jun
25,359Peak Premier in tracked matches
58Days played since 2025-12-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.2%48.3%51.0%2.7% short
Shot accuracy16.2%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.071.090.13 short
Match win rate44.7%46.9%48.4%3.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaamandFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning59
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49447Last 10049%Win rateLLWLLWLTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 6122 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility7.2
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch4.8

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.9
Utility7.2
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time591ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 18 May
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 10 Jun
445msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 20 Jun
13–1Biggest win · cache, 12 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 68% over 19anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA25141156%0.03
ancientS1913668%0.01
dust2C1661038%0.00
nukeA138562%0.02
mirageD113827%0.01
infernoD62433%0.02
anubisD5050%-0.05
overpassA53260%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

142,790Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
6,681Matches
44.7%Match win rate
48.2%Headshot %
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
17,659MVPs
3,362Hours (in match)
8,641Bombs planted
2,075Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4749,201
AWP8,475
MAC-104,273
Tec-93,119
FAMAS2,757
Knife2,681

Lifetime map wins

9,580inferno
9,557nuke
9,293dust2
8,584train
6,449vertigo
3,235cbble
117italy
79assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,025Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
87.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4753%1.1216.5
Anubis3540%1.0016.1
Nuke3077%1.4117.9
Inferno1540%1.2216.3
Dust21338%0.9114.7
Train1070%1.5017.7
Vertigo933%0.9717.7
Overpass743%0.7714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
585msReaction time
42.8%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
10.69HE damage / grenade
12.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–16-0.0216%17 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0127%17 Sept
ancient13–110.0015%15 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0111%8 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0615%6 Sept
cache13–60.0423%3 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0211%3 Sept
dust215–150.0418%3 Sept
ancient16–140.0023%5 Aug
cache13–50.1024%4 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0513%26 Jul
dust213–110.0016%26 Jul
cache12–120.0527%5 Jul
inferno7–130.0320%20 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0335%20 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0322%20 Jun
ancient10–130.0116%20 Jun
cache16–190.0320%19 Jun
ancient10–130.0120%19 Jun
cache13–5-0.0227%19 Jun
dust27–130.0220%18 Jun
cache10–130.0317%17 Jun
cache13–11-0.0133%13 Jun
cache4–13-0.0815%12 Jun
cache13–10.1028%12 Jun
cache4–130.0717%11 Jun
inferno13–70.0542%10 Jun
cache11–13-0.0621%10 Jun
dust26–13-0.0123%8 Jun
cache10–130.0122%8 Jun
dust216–130.0422%3 Jun
cache13–30.1036%3 Jun
cache13–40.0129%2 Jun
nuke12–160.0222%2 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0422%29 May
cache12–120.0725%29 May
cache13–40.0424%29 May
cache13–70.1129%28 May
ancient13–70.0318%20 May
anubis3–13-0.0813%20 May
inferno13–60.1315%18 May
nuke15–15-0.028%18 May
cache13–40.0311%18 May
cache13–11-0.0220%16 May
mirage11–130.0925%13 May
dust21–13-0.0610%12 May
cache13–4-0.0124%12 May
cache1–13-0.0428%6 May
cache10–130.0427%5 May
cache13–30.1036%5 May
cache13–8-0.0425%3 May
cache7–13-0.0029%30 Apr
dust210–130.0119%27 Apr
ancient13–50.0420%26 Apr
dust214–16-0.0214%23 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0220%23 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0418%21 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0316%19 Apr
mirage13–100.0117%13 Apr
dust216–130.0420%13 Apr
nuke13–40.0823%13 Apr
overpass15–150.0614%9 Apr
mirage13–80.0616%9 Apr
dust213–80.0324%9 Apr
dust210–13-0.0321%3 Apr
nuke13–80.0519%3 Apr
dust210–13-0.0220%1 Apr
overpass8–130.0123%1 Apr
nuke16–130.0316%1 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0031%1 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0440%28 Mar
nuke13–40.0615%25 Mar
inferno10–130.0116%25 Mar
ancient13–70.018%22 Mar
overpass13–110.0022%18 Mar
ancient13–80.0517%13 Mar
mirage11–130.0915%13 Mar
nuke13–10.0533%13 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0818%12 Mar
anubis3–13-0.079%12 Mar
ancient13–80.0130%10 Mar
nuke16–140.0311%10 Mar
dust210–13-0.0010%3 Mar
ancient9–130.0325%3 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0317%28 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0411%27 Feb
nuke13–80.0318%27 Feb
nuke13–70.0521%25 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0014%25 Feb
mirage13–70.0130%25 Feb
ancient13–90.0724%26 Jan
ancient13–70.0325%18 Jan
overpass13–100.0217%17 Jan
nuke15–15-0.0520%17 Jan
ancient13–8-0.0321%7 Jan
dust213–7-0.0120%2 Jan
mirage10–130.0133%30 Dec
overpass13–10-0.0227%29 Dec
ancient13–90.0217%29 Dec
dust213–60.0220%29 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →