Wi-Fi | WYFANG.NET

Wi-Fi | WYFANG.NET — CS2 Stats

KP76561198049848641[U:1:89582913]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,669Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
67,052Hours in CS315Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,668Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64452 of 220442 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 15 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,668 -207 18 Aug12 Sept · 13 days played
20,29621,363peak 21,36318 Aug12 Sept
22,160Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-08-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 695 below peak (21,363)
  • -207 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,332 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate68.0%43.8%44.9%above
Shot accuracy49.3%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio6.801.021.04above
Match win rate90.2%44.7%45.3%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWi-Fi | WYFANG.NETFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,668 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning68
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41518Last 10041%Win rateLWLWWTWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.1
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.8
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels7.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time563ms+34ms
first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.37Best match rating · 3–0 · office, 12 Sept
43%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · office, 12 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · mirage, 7 Sept
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 7 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB1910953%-0.00
ancientB147750%0.02
dust2B136746%0.01
mirageD103730%-0.00
anubisD92722%-0.00
officeS96367%0.08
cacheC94544%0.00
nukeD82625%0.01
vertigo3030%0.02
overpass3030%0.01
train21150%-0.00
fachwerk1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

4,785,590Lifetime kills
6.80K/D · Top 1% of Level 5 players
172,883Matches
90.2%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 5 players
68.0%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players
49.3%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 5 players
784,768MVPs
68,013Hours (in match)
186,459Bombs planted
58,226Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-471,297,071
M4A4 / M4A1-S1,065,356
AWP880,151
Glock-18208,447
SSG 08115,798
MP983,393
P25064,863
MAC-1064,852

Lifetime map wins

397,903dust2
315,931inferno
134,850nuke
93,894vertigo
82,104dust
77,334piranesi
75,561prodigy
74,222train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

20Matches
70%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
83.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis250%1.0819.5
Mirage2100%1.5015.5
Dust2250%0.7913.5
Inferno1100%2.1415.0
Nuke1100%1.2823.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
566msReaction time
60.8%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
9.08HE damage / grenade
5.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4929 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo5–130.0121%16 Sept
inferno13–100.0321%16 Sept
anubis10–130.0313%15 Sept
ancient13–30.0623%15 Sept
dust213–110.0621%13 Sept
fachwerk12–120.0513%12 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0313%12 Sept
nuke8–130.0523%12 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0126%12 Sept
office13–30.0816%12 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0214%12 Sept
office13–90.0132%12 Sept
office4–00.0225%12 Sept
office13–30.0531%12 Sept
office13–50.0827%12 Sept
office3–00.3743%12 Sept
cache10–130.0410%11 Sept
ancient13–70.0014%11 Sept
ancient13–60.0011%11 Sept
anubis10–130.0614%10 Sept
ancient7–130.0523%10 Sept
nuke12–120.0015%9 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0914%9 Sept
mirage9–130.0120%8 Sept
mirage9–130.0323%7 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0216%7 Sept
dust21–13-0.0219%7 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0319%7 Sept
nuke7–130.0436%7 Sept
dust213–20.0420%7 Sept
dust213–6-0.0418%6 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0711%6 Sept
ancient3–130.0517%6 Sept
mirage12–160.0014%6 Sept
office12–120.1016%6 Sept
dust213–40.1123%6 Sept
dust26–130.0112%6 Sept
office8–130.0117%6 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0419%4 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0318%4 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0216%3 Sept
cache13–100.0217%3 Sept
ancient8–130.0328%3 Sept
vertigo7–130.1015%3 Sept
inferno13–30.0210%3 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0211%1 Sept
inferno10–130.0317%31 Aug
cache7–13-0.0113%31 Aug
inferno13–110.0520%31 Aug
overpass4–13-0.0312%31 Aug
dust29–13-0.0225%30 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.056%30 Aug
cache11–130.0414%30 Aug
ancient9–130.0913%30 Aug
inferno13–90.0619%30 Aug
cache13–8-0.0211%29 Aug
dust213–80.0119%29 Aug
mirage9–130.0016%29 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0521%28 Aug
dust25–13-0.0123%28 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0410%28 Aug
inferno13–90.0521%28 Aug
inferno13–80.0426%27 Aug
ancient13–70.0120%27 Aug
cache13–80.0010%26 Aug
cache8–13-0.0427%26 Aug
inferno10–130.0630%25 Aug
anubis4–130.0115%25 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0313%25 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0510%25 Aug
nuke13–110.0718%24 Aug
dust216–120.0226%24 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0814%23 Aug
anubis13–90.0415%23 Aug
mirage13–90.059%23 Aug
nuke13–3-0.019%22 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0642%22 Aug
overpass2–130.0314%22 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0123%22 Aug
inferno13–100.0219%22 Aug
office11–13-0.018%21 Aug
train2–13-0.0320%21 Aug
ancient13–110.099%21 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0113%19 Aug
cache13–100.0120%19 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0314%19 Aug
nuke10–130.0014%18 Aug
dust26–13-0.0221%18 Aug
inferno7–130.0126%18 Aug
mirage4–3-0.0314%18 Aug
cache15–15-0.0424%18 Aug
mirage13–90.0121%18 Aug
dust28–13-0.0613%18 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0820%18 Aug
dust212–120.0827%18 Aug
overpass6–130.0217%17 Aug
train13–70.0213%17 Aug
anubis12–120.0115%15 Aug
ancient13–70.0313%15 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0415%15 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →