chad

chad — CS2 Stats

76561198048339181[U:1:88073453]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,684Tracked matches46%Win rate2022Tracked since
3,412Hours in CS40Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80464 of 251800 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +2,004 28 Aug – 11 Oct · 17 days played
17,82220,115peak 20,11528 Aug11 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,347 +0 28 Aug – 2 Sept · 3 observations
1,3471,347peak 1,34728 Aug2 Sept
20,497Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,347Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,347
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 4 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 115 below peak (20,115)
  • +1,488 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches87——
Win rate51%——
K/D1.10——
Headshot %46%——

Measured 18 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate41.7%46.9%49.3%7.6% short
Shot accuracy14.6%13.0%13.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.211.081.12above
Match win rate42.9%46.7%48.5%5.6% short

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGchadPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,347csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning75
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–47–7Last 10046%Win rateLLLWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3.5 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility3.8
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning7.5
Utility3.8
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels6.9
Win Impact3.8

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time573ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy26.6%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 26.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 26 Sept →
69%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · office, 9 Oct →
352msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · mirage, 5 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2410–1442%-0.02
nukeB168–850%0.01
mirageD165–1131%-0.01
ancientA117–464%0.04
cacheD93–633%0.02
anubisA95–456%-0.00
infernoS75–271%0.02
office—31–233%0.02
vertigo—20–20%-0.02
train—10–10%0.04
boulder—11–0100%0.05
overpass—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

113,111Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Pink band
4,756Matches
42.9%Match win rate
41.7%Headshot %
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
12,206MVPs
1,941Hours (in match)
2,724Bombs planted
1,108Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP34,132
AK-4718,289
SSG 085,866
P2504,699
P903,989
Negev3,113

Lifetime map wins

23,311dust2
2,998nuke
2,388office
1,373inferno
1,208vertigo
919train
722cbble
170italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

53Matches
45%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
80.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

12%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21856%1.2216.6
Mirage1338%1.0217.0
Nuke650%1.0315.3
Cache425%1.0213.3
Ancient333%1.0414.3
Inferno250%0.9820.5
Overpass10%0.9521.0
Anubis1100%1.7017.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.6%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
6.2°Preaim
555msReaction time
62.0%T opening success
53.1%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
1.3%Flash assists
7.74HE damage / grenade
5.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo8–13-0.0319%13 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0740%11 Oct →
dust23–130.0137%11 Oct →
cache13–110.0432%11 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0026%10 Oct →
nuke13–50.0624%10 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0625%10 Oct →
anubis13–90.0629%10 Oct →
cache13–70.0430%10 Oct →
anubis13–80.0415%10 Oct →
ancient9–130.1036%10 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0415%10 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0217%10 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0712%10 Oct →
anubis13–70.0240%10 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0338%10 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0129%9 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0239%9 Oct →
office1–130.0069%9 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0623%9 Oct →
train3–130.0419%9 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0142%9 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0128%9 Oct →
dust213–60.0923%9 Oct →
office13–70.0630%8 Oct →
nuke2–00.000%8 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0128%8 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.026%7 Oct →
ancient13–60.0632%5 Oct →
dust29–130.0414%4 Oct →
mirage4–130.0123%4 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0312%4 Oct →
anubis13–10.0926%4 Oct →
dust213–70.0322%4 Oct →
dust210–130.0622%4 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0433%4 Oct →
cache8–130.0321%4 Oct →
ancient13–90.0719%4 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0238%3 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0326%2 Oct →
inferno13–30.1041%2 Oct →
ancient12–120.0033%2 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0639%2 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0411%1 Oct →
cache8–130.0417%27 Sept →
nuke6–130.0421%27 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0126%27 Sept →
dust213–60.1018%27 Sept →
nuke13–70.0626%26 Sept →
mirage7–130.0123%26 Sept →
ancient13–80.0723%26 Sept →
cache13–50.0729%26 Sept →
ancient13–60.1523%26 Sept →
cache8–130.0328%26 Sept →
inferno4–130.0165%26 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0222%26 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0224%25 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0033%25 Sept →
mirage10–130.0125%25 Sept →
nuke8–130.0225%19 Sept →
dust213–90.0518%12 Sept →
nuke13–100.0615%12 Sept →
mirage13–100.0838%12 Sept →
nuke13–20.1027%12 Sept →
nuke13–50.0124%12 Sept →
dust29–13-0.1236%12 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0623%12 Sept →
boulder13–110.0525%12 Sept →
office8–13-0.0026%11 Sept →
mirage13–40.0235%11 Sept →
ancient11–130.1221%11 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.1417%6 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0526%6 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0714%6 Sept →
ancient13–90.0520%6 Sept →
mirage13–20.0932%6 Sept →
inferno13–70.1327%6 Sept →
nuke9–130.0118%6 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0539%5 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0121%5 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0029%5 Sept →
mirage13–110.0827%5 Sept →
ancient13–50.0217%5 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0514%5 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0221%5 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.1113%5 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0523%5 Sept →
dust27–13-0.057%5 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0535%5 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0122%5 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0213%5 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0045%5 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0715%5 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0818%5 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0356%5 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0419%5 Sept →
overpass12–4-0.0157%4 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0950%4 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0512%4 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0118%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.