SleepLess

SleepLess — CS2 Stats

NO76561198047224906[U:1:86959178]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,119Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,971Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,034Purple band · top ~16.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,034 -230 22 Aug – 27 Oct · 25 days played
15,37518,380peak 18,38022 Aug27 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,170 +0 13 Sept – 23 Sept · 2 observations
1,1701,170peak 1,17013 Sept23 Sept
19,154Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,170Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-08-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 346 below peak (18,380)
  • +2,328 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,966 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate49.0%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy9.5%12.7%13.0%3.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.051.060.08 short
Match win rate40.0%45.7%46.3%6.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSleepLessFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,034 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,170csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning52
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateLLLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility7.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.2
Utility7.0
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time517ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 517ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 16 Oct →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 15 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 10 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
14–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 21anubisWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2314–961%0.00
ancientS2114–767%-0.01
dust2B1910–953%0.00
anubisC188–1044%-0.00
infernoB136–746%-0.01
nuke—42–250%0.02
cache—21–150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

108,991Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
5,140Matches
40.0%Match win rate
49.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
9.5%Shot accuracy
9,042MVPs
2,434Hours (in match)
6,306Bombs planted
1,127Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,152
AWP9,827
P902,310
MAC-102,230
MP91,997

Lifetime map wins

9,434dust2
7,677inferno
2,784nuke
1,009train
886vertigo
521cbble
97office
49italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

169Matches
55%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
76.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3969%1.1815.8
Anubis2357%1.0716.0
Mirage2361%0.9415.0
Inferno2259%1.0115.8
Dust21656%0.9215.3
Nuke825%1.1317.6
Vertigo425%0.7014.3
Overpass250%1.7223.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
519msReaction time
48.7%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
9.76HE damage / grenade
15.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.9793% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0318%27 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0615%26 Oct →
dust211–130.0422%26 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0314%26 Oct →
inferno13–30.0218%20 Oct →
cache7–130.0011%16 Oct →
dust29–130.0021%16 Oct →
ancient13–60.1121%16 Oct →
mirage13–50.0713%16 Oct →
dust213–30.2029%16 Oct →
anubis16–140.0315%15 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0336%15 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0812%15 Oct →
mirage13–100.0524%14 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0326%11 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0015%11 Oct →
dust213–110.0530%11 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0315%10 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.079%10 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0717%10 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0422%10 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0514%10 Oct →
inferno13–80.0626%10 Oct →
mirage4–130.0414%9 Oct →
mirage13–100.0519%9 Oct →
cache13–80.0828%9 Oct →
ancient13–90.0415%8 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0417%8 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0512%8 Oct →
dust213–110.0216%6 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0419%6 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.027%6 Oct →
anubis16–140.0415%5 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0319%4 Oct →
ancient13–50.0216%4 Oct →
anubis13–20.0316%4 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0813%4 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0219%4 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0115%4 Oct →
nuke13–30.0919%4 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0121%4 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0321%4 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0119%3 Oct →
mirage13–110.0315%3 Oct →
dust213–80.0321%2 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0316%2 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0223%29 Sept →
dust24–13-0.046%29 Sept →
mirage13–90.0523%24 Sept →
mirage16–130.0422%22 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0118%22 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0415%22 Sept →
dust216–120.0328%19 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0923%18 Sept →
ancient13–20.0526%18 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0322%18 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0415%11 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.0313%11 Sept →
dust213–60.0621%11 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0423%10 Sept →
inferno10–130.0224%10 Sept →
mirage10–130.0321%9 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0021%9 Sept →
anubis13–160.0216%9 Sept →
anubis13–90.0324%8 Sept →
mirage13–80.0119%8 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0514%3 Sept →
mirage7–130.0319%3 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0010%31 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0116%31 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0117%31 Aug →
ancient13–110.0216%30 Aug →
inferno13–50.0419%30 Aug →
dust213–110.0118%30 Aug →
nuke6–130.0017%29 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0325%29 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0326%29 Aug →
inferno8–130.0023%29 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0313%28 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0616%28 Aug →
nuke11–130.0225%28 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0217%28 Aug →
anubis10–130.0117%28 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0212%28 Aug →
anubis13–110.0911%28 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0122%27 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0720%27 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0317%26 Aug →
ancient13–50.0422%26 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0613%26 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0218%23 Aug →
anubis13–70.128%23 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0617%23 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.029%22 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.057%22 Aug →
mirage13–60.0314%22 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0816%21 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0318%21 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0410%21 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0115%19 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.