Byggmester Bob

Byggmester Bob — CS2 Stats

NO76561198119386395[U:1:159120667]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

965Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,603Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#96611 of 239506 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 989 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 12 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,603 +2,224 20 Jun6 Sept · 9 days played
16,10018,603peak 18,60320 Jun6 Sept
18,603Peak Premier in tracked matches
989Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-06-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 989
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 62 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,603
  • +861 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,224 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,397 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGByggmester BobFACEITLevel 5 · 989 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,603 · Purple bandPEAK ELO989csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning41
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53461Last 10053%Win rateWWLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility6.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.1
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time601ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 23 Jul
35%Best headshot accuracy · 16–14 · anubis, 10 Sept
430msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 19 Jun
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1014In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 24mirageWeakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2418675%-0.01
infernoA2112957%-0.01
mirageC1981142%-0.01
anubisB1991047%-0.01
dust2A116555%-0.03
cache4040%-0.00
nuke2020%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

192Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
71.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4862%1.0515.2
Inferno4652%1.0014.9
Mirage3661%0.9414.0
Anubis3238%0.9615.1
Dust21850%0.8513.6
Nuke812%0.9216.1
Cache40%0.8212.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
604msReaction time
28.6%T opening success
33.1%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
13.20HE damage / grenade
8.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.6199% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–130.0335%22 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0422%22 Sept
dust210–130.0128%22 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0511%13 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0530%13 Sept
ancient13–80.0129%11 Sept
mirage13–1-0.0217%11 Sept
dust213–6-0.0733%11 Sept
anubis16–140.0135%10 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0124%10 Sept
dust213–7-0.0518%6 Sept
ancient13–40.0224%6 Sept
anubis11–130.0116%6 Sept
dust211–13-0.0328%3 Sept
anubis13–70.0135%3 Sept
dust216–13-0.0222%2 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0528%2 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0833%2 Sept
anubis9–130.0418%28 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0816%28 Aug
dust213–100.0322%28 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0420%28 Aug
dust27–13-0.0414%21 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0122%21 Aug
ancient13–90.0122%21 Aug
inferno14–16-0.1018%19 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0814%19 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0225%19 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0013%17 Aug
dust216–12-0.0029%17 Aug
ancient13–110.0210%17 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0217%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0124%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0429%13 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0123%13 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1023%13 Aug
mirage13–100.0121%11 Aug
dust26–13-0.0116%11 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0216%11 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0216%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0020%10 Aug
dust213–11-0.0224%10 Aug
inferno13–30.0612%9 Aug
anubis16–140.0415%9 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0119%9 Aug
ancient13–80.0124%6 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0218%6 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0416%4 Aug
ancient13–40.0320%4 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0122%2 Aug
cache6–13-0.0416%2 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0315%23 Jul
anubis13–10.088%23 Jul
mirage13–80.0324%23 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0614%22 Jul
inferno13–50.0316%22 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0311%22 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0026%21 Jul
cache5–130.0434%21 Jul
dust24–13-0.0911%21 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0125%21 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0816%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0115%19 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0417%19 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0317%18 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0018%18 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0015%18 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0320%18 Jul
anubis13–50.0517%14 Jul
mirage15–150.0326%14 Jul
inferno13–70.0115%14 Jul
ancient13–90.0418%13 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0013%13 Jul
ancient11–130.0319%13 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0126%13 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0122%8 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0419%8 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0724%6 Jul
cache10–13-0.0618%6 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0625%6 Jul
inferno13–110.0424%3 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0229%3 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0320%2 Jul
mirage10–130.0118%2 Jul
mirage13–90.0124%2 Jul
inferno14–160.0420%29 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0113%29 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0515%29 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0219%25 Jun
anubis13–5-0.029%25 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0811%24 Jun
ancient13–30.0612%21 Jun
anubis10–130.0213%21 Jun
inferno13–100.0413%20 Jun
mirage13–100.0411%20 Jun
anubis17–190.0021%20 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0015%19 Jun
ancient13–100.0623%19 Jun
cache8–130.0515%12 Jun
mirage16–120.0128%12 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →