v1nz4ne

v1nz4ne — CS2 Stats

76561197968588353[U:1:8322625]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,423Tracked matches67%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,073Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating20,569Top 50% of 211,494 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#75155 of 258672 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,344 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,569 +1,401 11 Aug – 27 Oct · 20 days played
18,58820,902peak 20,90211 Aug27 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,344 +0 4 Sept – 23 Sept · 3 observations
1,3441,344peak 1,3444 Sept23 Sept
20,921Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,344Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-08-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,344
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 7 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 333 below peak (20,902)
  • +467 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,401 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,431 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate55.8%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy5.2%13.2%13.7%8.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.511.071.09above
Match win rate42.2%46.9%48.4%6.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGv1nz4neFACEITLevel 9 · 1,344 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,569 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,344csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning66
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–42Last 10058%Win rateLLLWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility7.1
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.6
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time519ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 502ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 11 Oct →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 16–14 · mirage, 26 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 21 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
16–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 78% over 23infernoWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2318–578%0.03
mirageA2012–860%-0.01
infernoC188–1044%0.00
anubisB179–853%0.00
dust2C167–944%-0.01
cache—42–250%0.00
nuke—22–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,495Lifetime kills
1.51K/D · Top 10% of Level 9 players
2,735Matches
42.2%Match win rate
55.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
5.2%Shot accuracy
5,350MVPs
1,148Hours (in match)
2,754Bombs planted
799Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,308
AWP5,276
FAMAS2,096
MP91,788
MAC-101,423
P901,153

Lifetime map wins

5,539inferno
3,298dust2
1,636nuke
369vertigo
146train
131dust
117aztec
82cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

333Matches
54%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
81.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7868%1.2016.8
Inferno6951%1.3316.9
Anubis6552%1.3016.6
Mirage5758%1.0915.9
Dust23253%1.0015.5
Nuke128%1.0716.0
Cache633%1.0515.0
Vertigo540%0.7711.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
518msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
59.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
9.99HE damage / grenade
19.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0794% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.028%27 Oct →
ancient8–130.0113%26 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0116%26 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0110%26 Oct →
cache13–40.0617%25 Oct →
dust213–110.0721%25 Oct →
mirage13–110.0411%25 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0613%22 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0222%22 Oct →
ancient13–60.0516%22 Oct →
inferno13–30.0419%20 Oct →
mirage13–70.0114%18 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0119%18 Oct →
anubis13–110.0119%18 Oct →
anubis16–140.0218%15 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0118%15 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0210%15 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0227%13 Oct →
ancient13–50.1413%11 Oct →
ancient13–90.0419%8 Oct →
anubis10–130.0712%8 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.019%8 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0120%6 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.018%6 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.039%6 Oct →
nuke13–50.006%4 Oct →
ancient13–50.0421%4 Oct →
anubis13–20.0813%4 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0510%4 Oct →
dust213–80.0222%2 Oct →
dust29–13-0.028%29 Sept →
ancient7–130.0114%29 Sept →
dust24–130.0010%29 Sept →
inferno13–30.088%26 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0238%26 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0224%26 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0411%23 Sept →
nuke13–70.0516%23 Sept →
mirage13–100.019%23 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0112%22 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0521%22 Sept →
dust210–130.0116%22 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0512%19 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0020%19 Sept →
mirage6–130.1232%18 Sept →
ancient13–20.039%18 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.068%18 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0114%16 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0013%16 Sept →
anubis16–140.0320%10 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0011%10 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0224%6 Sept →
ancient13–40.0417%6 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0514%6 Sept →
mirage10–130.0113%4 Sept →
anubis11–130.0310%4 Sept →
inferno13–80.0017%4 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0418%4 Sept →
dust211–13-0.076%3 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0113%3 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0417%2 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.069%2 Sept →
ancient13–110.008%2 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.028%30 Aug →
inferno13–50.0124%30 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0613%30 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0227%29 Aug →
ancient7–130.0018%29 Aug →
inferno8–130.017%29 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.067%26 Aug →
ancient13–50.015%26 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0516%26 Aug →
mirage13–80.0218%23 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0113%23 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.019%23 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0133%21 Aug →
anubis7–130.019%21 Aug →
ancient13–90.0319%21 Aug →
inferno14–160.0026%19 Aug →
anubis10–130.0220%19 Aug →
ancient11–130.0111%19 Aug →
mirage13–50.0115%17 Aug →
dust216–120.0624%17 Aug →
ancient13–110.0211%17 Aug →
ancient13–100.0315%16 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0319%16 Aug →
mirage7–130.0114%13 Aug →
inferno6–130.0511%13 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0430%13 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0318%11 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0319%11 Aug →
inferno14–160.0015%11 Aug →
inferno13–30.016%9 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0110%9 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0521%9 Aug →
ancient13–80.1126%6 Aug →
inferno13–100.1120%6 Aug →
ancient9–130.0115%4 Aug →
ancient13–40.1315%4 Aug →
ancient13–110.0517%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.