sluggish sloper

sluggish sloper — CS2 Stats

KR76561198033516560[U:1:73250832]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

59Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.4 Learning
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim40
Positioning32
Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD23275Last 5542%Win rateWLLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.0
Aggression2.9
Utility1.9
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 63% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.0
Positioning3.2
Utility1.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact3.8

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time621ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 701ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+9.2%
first ⅓ avg 11.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 55 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — inferno 16–3
130Biggest win — mills
5Longest win streak
32In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
25Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC145936%-0.04
mirageB105550%-0.04
cacheD62433%-0.05
overpassS64267%-0.02
dust2D51420%-0.06
vertigo3030%-0.04
anubis21150%-0.03
jura21150%-0.05
grail21150%-0.02
mills220100%-0.04
train21150%-0.03
office1010%-0.08

Across the last 55 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
25.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
23.5%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
610msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
24.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
10.32HE damage / grenade
3.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.8113 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.8669% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–10-0.0715%1 Jun
cache8–13-0.0527%1 Jun
cache10–13-0.129%10 May
inferno4–13-0.079%16 Feb
inferno2–7-0.0350%16 Feb
overpass13–10.0113%9 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0419%9 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0121%9 Aug
inferno4–4-0.067%2 Jun
dust27–13-0.1111%31 May
mirage13–2-0.0336%31 May
jura10–13-0.059%31 May
grail12–12-0.0224%31 May
inferno13–8-0.0813%30 May
inferno9–13-0.1027%14 May
dust210–13-0.0625%14 May
anubis8–13-0.0424%14 May
jura13–10-0.0430%11 May
mirage4–13-0.0824%11 May
grail13–7-0.0319%11 May
inferno13–9-0.0422%2 May
overpass12–12-0.0223%24 Jul
inferno1–8-0.070%11 Jul
mirage13–2-0.048%11 Jul
mills13–0-0.0113%11 Jul
mills13–11-0.0816%10 Jul
mirage4–5-0.0630%5 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0324%5 Sept
vertigo3–13-0.0910%5 Sept
inferno7–16-0.0117%31 Aug
train7–16-0.0717%31 Aug
dust213–16-0.0413%31 Aug
mirage16–80.0416%31 Aug
train16–70.0216%29 Aug
vertigo4–16-0.0210%29 Aug
cache14–16-0.037%29 Aug
inferno16–30.0719%28 Aug
mirage12–160.016%28 Aug
office2–16-0.0814%25 Aug
dust216–11-0.0219%25 Aug
overpass16–10-0.0111%24 Aug
mirage16–50.0215%7 Jun
dust29–16-0.0914%7 Jun
cache7–16-0.0210%29 May
overpass16–8-0.059%29 May
vertigo11–16-0.0117%18 May
overpass16–12-0.055%24 Apr
mirage15–15-0.089%17 Apr
mirage1–16-0.113%19 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0810%10 Feb
inferno7–16-0.085%17 Jan
inferno6–20.0512%20 Jun
cache16–11-0.049%24 May
mirage15–15-0.077%24 May
overpass6–160.0029%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →