hagrid

hagrid — CS2 Stats

GB76561198027019190[U:1:66753462]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

227Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,525Purple band · top ~14.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25066 of 54367 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhagridPREMIER18,525 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning48
Utility6

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46477Last 10046%Win rateLLWWTLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression6.0
Utility0.6
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 666ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.8
Utility0.6
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time660ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 660ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — overpass 13–6
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
613In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 50% over 16overpassWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB39182146%-0.01
anubisB168850%-0.01
mirageC104640%0.01
ancientC83538%-0.02
overpassD62433%0.00
trainD62433%-0.01
dust2C52340%-0.04
edin32167%-0.03
cache21150%0.00
basalt21150%-0.00
mills220100%0.02
nuke110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches
40%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
88.1%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
666msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.21Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
6.53HE damage / grenade
0.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2108 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.8148% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.0028%28 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0421%28 Jun
cache13–70.0121%6 Jun
inferno13–30.0618%6 Jun
mirage12–120.0515%6 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0316%15 Jul
dust22–13-0.0423%15 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0411%15 Jul
dust214–16-0.059%14 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0216%14 Jul
dust213–60.0020%14 Jul
mirage11–130.1120%3 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0516%27 May
anubis8–130.0313%14 May
anubis13–40.0220%13 May
overpass13–60.1123%13 May
mirage13–50.0422%13 May
inferno10–13-0.0221%12 May
ancient3–13-0.1113%12 May
anubis13–50.0611%12 May
inferno11–13-0.0216%11 May
train13–10-0.0114%11 May
anubis13–60.0314%11 May
train7–11-0.0717%11 May
inferno13–110.0422%6 May
inferno11–13-0.0315%6 May
inferno13–6-0.0217%6 May
dust213–10-0.0416%8 Apr
nuke13–50.0211%8 Apr
inferno14–16-0.0719%8 Apr
inferno7–13-0.1010%1 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0029%1 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0517%1 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0220%1 Apr
dust22–13-0.0729%1 Apr
inferno13–40.008%26 Mar
inferno1–8-0.120%23 Mar
inferno13–00.1014%23 Mar
inferno9–130.0416%23 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0213%23 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0222%23 Mar
inferno10–3-0.0516%23 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0317%21 Mar
train8–130.0139%21 Mar
anubis16–13-0.0715%21 Mar
inferno13–11-0.048%21 Mar
edin2–13-0.0617%19 Mar
basalt7–13-0.0315%19 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0120%19 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0225%18 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0214%11 Jan
train11–130.0328%11 Jan
basalt13–40.0329%5 Jan
inferno13–70.0829%5 Jan
inferno10–10.0141%5 Jan
train8–13-0.0124%5 Jan
edin13–60.0017%8 Dec
train13–7-0.0119%24 Nov
edin13–9-0.0417%18 Nov
inferno13–90.0621%9 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0320%9 Sept
overpass12–12-0.0230%24 Jul
inferno1–8-0.0610%11 Jul
mirage13–20.1030%11 Jul
mills13–00.0848%11 Jul
mills13–11-0.0425%10 Jul
inferno8–130.0822%4 Apr
anubis3–130.0321%18 Dec
anubis7–13-0.0515%18 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0325%13 Dec
anubis13–80.0012%13 Dec
overpass4–13-0.0512%13 Dec
inferno13–90.0516%13 Dec
inferno13–7-0.0013%12 Dec
inferno13–8-0.0015%12 Dec
ancient13–60.0317%12 Dec
ancient13–80.0429%12 Dec
anubis13–9-0.0420%11 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0224%11 Dec
overpass13–16-0.0417%27 Nov
inferno6–13-0.0521%27 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0211%26 Nov
mirage13–8-0.0517%26 Nov
mirage16–130.0014%12 Nov
anubis4–13-0.0921%11 Nov
inferno11–13-0.0813%11 Nov
anubis13–30.0219%10 Nov
inferno12–12-0.0515%10 Nov
overpass11–13-0.0114%25 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0813%25 Sept
ancient11–130.0128%25 Sept
inferno13–80.0118%25 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0019%25 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0318%24 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0020%23 Sept
mirage3–13-0.089%23 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0616%23 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0816%23 Sept
overpass13–50.0123%23 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0314%23 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →