nyawton

nyawton — CS2 Stats

SE76561198033487673[U:1:73221945]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,246Tracked matches62%Win rate2021Tracked since
5,717Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22694 of 259118 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,980 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 -1 22 Aug – 30 Oct · 18 days played
23,34825,000peak 25,00022 Aug30 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,980 +0 28 Aug – 19 Oct · 5 observations
1,9801,980peak 1,98028 Aug19 Oct
25,105Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,980Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-08-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,980
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 21 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1 below peak (25,000)
  • +796 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate54.6%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy10.9%13.2%13.7%2.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.111.071.09above
Match win rate64.8%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnyawtonFACEITLevel 9 · 1,980 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,980csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning68
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateWLWWWWTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −9.2pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.6
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.8
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels8.2
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time552ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 540ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy27.2%+4.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 27.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–0 · ancient, 12 Sept →
80%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · inferno, 12 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · ancient, 10 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
11–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA1810–856%-0.00
anubisB157–847%0.00
ancientA149–564%0.02
nukeS128–467%0.02
dust2D113–827%-0.00
mirageC94–544%-0.00
vertigoS75–271%-0.01
cacheS64–267%0.04
overpass—32–167%-0.01
train—20–20%0.00
italy—20–20%0.08
office—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

208,374Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
12,381Matches
64.8%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 9 players
54.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
10.9%Shot accuracy
26,305MVPs
6,689Hours (in match)
4,038Bombs planted
1,401Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4790,292
AWP18,873
MP94,977
MAC-103,917
P2503,379

Lifetime map wins

12,239inferno
6,977nuke
6,156dust2
4,020vertigo
2,497office
1,554train
1,044cbble
506italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

605Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
84.2ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13550%1.0416.9
Anubis11049%1.0717.7
Inferno10956%1.2017.7
Ancient9755%1.1516.9
Nuke5558%1.2018.2
Dust23842%0.9114.5
Vertigo3345%1.1817.4
Overpass1567%1.0014.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.4%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
544msReaction time
69.0%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
13.01HE damage / grenade
7.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4742 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.0118%30 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0117%30 Oct →
inferno13–70.0123%30 Oct →
overpass13–11-0.0913%30 Oct →
anubis13–40.0227%30 Oct →
mirage13–50.0231%30 Oct →
train12–120.0029%30 Oct →
vertigo13–20.039%28 Oct →
ancient13–30.0917%28 Oct →
italy9–130.0928%28 Oct →
vertigo13–3-0.0023%28 Oct →
inferno13–30.0838%27 Oct →
cache3–00.0767%27 Oct →
vertigo9–13-0.0319%25 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0321%25 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0235%24 Oct →
overpass9–13-0.0125%23 Oct →
vertigo13–4-0.0024%15 Oct →
mirage4–130.0231%14 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0122%14 Oct →
ancient13–80.1125%13 Oct →
mirage11–130.0221%13 Oct →
inferno13–90.0221%13 Oct →
anubis13–60.0629%13 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0938%13 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0613%12 Oct →
nuke12–7-0.0020%12 Oct →
cache13–40.0443%12 Oct →
inferno9–00.0680%12 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0325%12 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0318%10 Oct →
train7–130.0019%10 Oct →
italy12–120.0827%10 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0228%8 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0616%8 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0314%8 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0526%6 Oct →
vertigo0–13-0.0624%6 Oct →
cache13–60.0128%6 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0326%5 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0223%5 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0324%5 Oct →
dust29–130.069%5 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0121%5 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0328%4 Oct →
anubis11–130.0228%4 Oct →
nuke13–30.1227%4 Oct →
dust213–100.0122%4 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.1120%4 Oct →
nuke13–50.0838%4 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0230%3 Oct →
vertigo13–5-0.0315%3 Oct →
nuke5–9-0.0429%3 Oct →
overpass13–90.0718%3 Oct →
nuke9–130.0232%3 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0919%28 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0124%28 Sept →
dust213–50.0629%28 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0318%28 Sept →
mirage19–15-0.0114%27 Sept →
inferno4–110.0232%21 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0015%20 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0426%20 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0414%20 Sept →
anubis11–130.0833%16 Sept →
ancient9–130.0123%14 Sept →
mirage13–80.0519%14 Sept →
ancient13–40.0717%14 Sept →
cache15–190.0422%14 Sept →
anubis13–110.0020%12 Sept →
ancient13–00.1632%12 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0422%12 Sept →
anubis25–280.0021%6 Sept →
vertigo13–30.0226%6 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0128%6 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.100%6 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0222%5 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0212%5 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0227%5 Sept →
inferno4–130.0123%5 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0022%5 Sept →
dust27–130.1217%5 Sept →
cache19–170.0712%4 Sept →
inferno15–19-0.0622%4 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0520%4 Sept →
nuke13–110.0823%3 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0624%3 Sept →
anubis13–90.0231%1 Sept →
ancient3–2-0.0443%1 Sept →
office1–13-0.0446%31 Aug →
nuke13–80.0721%31 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0123%31 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0533%27 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.047%22 Aug →
nuke13–110.0529%22 Aug →
ancient16–140.0414%22 Aug →
anubis13–30.1219%22 Aug →
inferno13–90.0923%22 Aug →
dust213–110.0018%22 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0123%22 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.