flytwesT

flytwesT — CS2 Stats

SB76561197981820882[U:1:21555154]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,317Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,805Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,825Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88675 of 259124 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,317 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,825 -2,301 24 Jul – 25 Oct · 22 days played
17,59922,460peak 22,46024 Jul25 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,328 +0 30 Aug – 25 Oct · 9 observations
1,3281,328peak 1,32830 Aug25 Oct
23,226Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,328Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-07-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,328
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 23 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,635 below peak (22,460)
  • -979 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,635 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 175 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 25 Oct 2026 and 1 Nov 2026.

Measured 25 Oct 2026 → 1 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate51.0%44.4%46.9%above
Shot accuracy10.1%11.9%13.0%2.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.031.08meets
Match win rate49.0%45.2%46.7%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGflytwesTPREMIER19,825 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,328csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning46
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–54–4Last 10042%Win rateLLWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.6
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time560ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 15 Aug →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 6 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 25 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 15 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC198–1142%-0.00
infernoB136–746%-0.02
nukeS139–469%0.01
anubisD123–925%0.00
mirageC104–640%-0.02
ancientA95–456%-0.02
vertigoC73–443%-0.00
dust2D62–433%-0.04
overpass—31–233%-0.01
fachwerk—20–20%-0.02
train—10–10%0.03
italy—10–10%-0.03
boulder—10–10%0.01
office—10–10%-0.06
eldorado—11–0100%0.08
shelter—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

94,364Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Purple band
4,873Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Purple band
51.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Purple band
10.1%Shot accuracy
13,314MVPs
2,805Hours (in match)
5,609Bombs planted
1,347Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,541
AWP7,986
MAC-103,344
MP93,275
FAMAS1,666

Lifetime map wins

7,217inferno
5,778dust2
5,685vertigo
4,601nuke
1,962train
999cbble
390lake
172office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

505Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
74.6ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8452%1.0614.9
Vertigo8156%1.1915.6
Mirage6742%0.9114.9
Anubis6549%1.0213.9
Inferno6352%0.9414.1
Nuke4953%1.1315.2
Dust24846%0.8713.5
Overpass2352%1.0414.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
560msReaction time
42.0%T opening success
33.5%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
9.81HE damage / grenade
10.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.463% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.0916%22 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0723%22 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0111%20 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0521%20 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0213%13 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.008%13 Oct →
anubis13–60.0716%13 Oct →
dust25–130.0315%13 Oct →
anubis6–130.0217%12 Oct →
nuke12–70.0418%12 Oct →
cache13–40.0327%12 Oct →
inferno9–0-0.0125%12 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0817%10 Oct →
train7–130.0320%10 Oct →
italy12–12-0.0316%10 Oct →
overpass11–13-0.0213%10 Oct →
vertigo13–20.0618%10 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0519%6 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0610%5 Oct →
nuke13–40.0919%5 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0418%5 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0914%5 Oct →
nuke9–130.0111%3 Oct →
ancient9–130.0111%2 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.069%2 Oct →
vertigo6–130.0030%2 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.1018%30 Sept →
vertigo4–9-0.0210%30 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0313%19 Aug →
vertigo13–3-0.0017%19 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0517%18 Aug →
cache13–10.0224%15 Aug →
cache13–20.1423%15 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0129%13 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0228%13 Aug →
ancient13–10.0530%13 Aug →
inferno13–40.0227%11 Aug →
nuke13–40.0317%11 Aug →
overpass13–5-0.0324%11 Aug →
cache10–130.039%9 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0319%7 Aug →
anubis6–130.0125%7 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0334%6 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0314%6 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0620%2 Aug →
anubis11–130.0214%2 Aug →
cache13–110.0124%2 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0422%2 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0525%2 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0313%2 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0226%1 Aug →
mirage13–20.0825%1 Aug →
boulder4–130.0113%30 Jul →
office2–13-0.0613%30 Jul →
vertigo5–130.0129%30 Jul →
anubis13–160.0326%30 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0124%30 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0534%30 Jul →
ancient13–2-0.0430%30 Jul →
inferno14–16-0.0414%26 Jul →
anubis10–130.0222%26 Jul →
nuke13–100.0320%26 Jul →
ancient13–70.0119%26 Jul →
dust213–2-0.0523%26 Jul →
inferno13–30.0329%26 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0724%25 Jul →
nuke13–90.0614%25 Jul →
cache12–16-0.0725%25 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0718%25 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0519%25 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.039%25 Jul →
anubis13–110.0220%25 Jul →
overpass6–130.0215%24 Jul →
cache12–120.0819%24 Jul →
vertigo12–12-0.0029%24 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0225%24 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0229%24 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0610%24 Jul →
eldorado9–20.0825%23 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0216%23 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0811%23 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0311%23 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0417%23 Jul →
nuke13–60.0319%20 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0313%20 Jul →
ancient13–80.0128%20 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0620%18 Jul →
cache12–120.0313%18 Jul →
fachwerk6–13-0.0226%18 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0132%18 Jul →
anubis13–20.0330%13 Jul →
mirage2–130.0324%13 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0132%12 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0219%12 Jul →
cache5–130.0228%12 Jul →
fachwerk9–13-0.0124%12 Jul →
shelter8–13-0.0524%12 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0319%11 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0812%11 Jul →
mirage13–60.0620%11 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.