Ali Khamenei

Ali Khamenei — CS2 Stats

76561198032411402[U:1:72145674]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,416Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating21,807Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#56428 of 251272 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,807 -1,560 26 Aug – 10 Oct · 28 days played
21,37124,017peak 24,01726 Aug10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,751 +0 16 Sept – 20 Sept · 2 observations
1,7511,751peak 1,75116 Sept20 Sept
24,392Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,751Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,751
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 250 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,210 below peak (24,017)
  • -1,596 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,193 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAli KhameneiPREMIER21,807 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,751csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning60
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39–55–6Last 10039%Win rateLLTLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility6.2
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch5.6

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 31% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning6.0
Utility6.2
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time568ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 30 Sept →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 26 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 14 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 54% over 13infernoWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2411–1346%0.01
anubisD165–1131%0.01
dust2C146–843%0.01
mirageB136–746%-0.01
cacheB137–654%0.01
infernoD112–918%0.00
ancientD82–625%0.01
poseidon—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

616Matches
52%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
86.5ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient6557%1.1617.6
Nuke6456%1.2218.0
Dust22850%1.1416.8
Inferno2148%1.0915.4
Train2055%1.4816.2
Anubis1942%1.1217.4
Overpass1669%1.2419.7
Mirage1443%1.1314.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
65.7%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
577msReaction time
58.3%T opening success
30.6%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
6.85HE damage / grenade
8.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.5505% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno14–16-0.0022%10 Oct →
inferno5–130.0021%10 Oct →
nuke15–150.0123%10 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0726%10 Oct →
anubis13–110.0821%10 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0130%10 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0622%8 Oct →
mirage8–2-0.0412%8 Oct →
nuke6–130.0015%8 Oct →
nuke13–80.0910%6 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0619%5 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0431%5 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0120%5 Oct →
ancient9–130.0015%5 Oct →
mirage13–60.0825%5 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0111%5 Oct →
anubis10–130.1720%4 Oct →
nuke5–130.0629%4 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0723%3 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0421%3 Oct →
anubis13–100.0126%2 Oct →
nuke15–150.0310%2 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0110%2 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.037%30 Sept →
dust213–00.1814%30 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0317%30 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0416%30 Sept →
nuke13–90.0616%30 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0321%28 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0518%28 Sept →
mirage13–100.0517%27 Sept →
anubis3–130.0029%27 Sept →
nuke16–140.0334%26 Sept →
cache13–40.0330%26 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0319%26 Sept →
dust215–150.0226%26 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0025%26 Sept →
cache13–70.1023%26 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0413%26 Sept →
mirage13–40.0623%26 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0713%22 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0217%21 Sept →
nuke15–150.0020%21 Sept →
nuke13–100.0623%21 Sept →
poseidon5–9-0.0615%20 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0213%19 Sept →
anubis11–130.0317%19 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0321%15 Sept →
ancient11–130.0117%15 Sept →
dust26–130.0319%14 Sept →
nuke13–90.0120%14 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0814%14 Sept →
dust28–130.1122%12 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0318%12 Sept →
inferno13–110.0514%12 Sept →
ancient11–130.0116%9 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0314%9 Sept →
inferno9–130.0223%6 Sept →
cache13–30.1035%6 Sept →
nuke13–50.0315%6 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0224%6 Sept →
cache13–110.0522%6 Sept →
inferno13–60.0325%5 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0118%5 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0415%5 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0228%4 Sept →
cache10–13-0.066%4 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0614%4 Sept →
nuke13–100.0326%4 Sept →
cache13–100.0515%4 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0619%4 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0113%3 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0312%3 Sept →
anubis13–70.0222%2 Sept →
cache11–130.0720%2 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0121%2 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0011%2 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0422%30 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0614%30 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0119%30 Aug →
ancient6–130.0112%30 Aug →
anubis13–100.1016%30 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0326%28 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0816%28 Aug →
ancient13–40.0417%28 Aug →
cache13–90.0114%27 Aug →
mirage13–80.0022%27 Aug →
dust213–90.0018%27 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0714%27 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0313%27 Aug →
dust213–90.0337%26 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0424%26 Aug →
inferno7–130.0324%26 Aug →
dust213–110.0519%26 Aug →
ancient13–60.0422%25 Aug →
inferno8–130.0519%24 Aug →
nuke13–70.095%24 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0313%23 Aug →
nuke0–13-0.0430%22 Aug →
anubis4–130.0121%22 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.