Crabber

Crabber — CS2 Stats

76561198026415064[U:1:66149336]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,504Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,267Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#92399 of 251271 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,267 +928 23 Aug – 11 Oct · 33 days played
17,20419,715peak 19,71523 Aug11 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,615 +0 3 Sept – 20 Sept · 3 observations
1,6151,615peak 1,6153 Sept20 Sept
19,876Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,615Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,615
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 136 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 448 below peak (19,715)
  • +981 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 733 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCrabberPREMIER19,267 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,615csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning54
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–54–4Last 10042%Win rateLLWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +5.3pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time609ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 17 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 6 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 11 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 22ancientWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2215–768%0.01
cacheD165–1131%-0.02
ancientD153–1220%-0.00
anubisD134–931%-0.03
mirageA127–558%0.01
infernoD113–827%-0.02
dust2B105–550%-0.01
poseidon—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,129Matches
49%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
82.2ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient13546%1.0617.9
Nuke12265%1.0816.3
Anubis4544%1.0015.6
Dust24248%0.9213.6
Train3954%1.2918.9
Mirage3826%0.6812.2
Inferno2744%0.9716.3
Overpass2152%0.9616.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
603msReaction time
55.1%T opening success
44.9%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
10.68HE damage / grenade
6.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache2–13-0.0719%11 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0618%11 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0120%10 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0519%10 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0518%8 Oct →
mirage8–20.0417%8 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0118%8 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0218%6 Oct →
nuke13–80.0526%5 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0520%5 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.069%5 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0310%5 Oct →
mirage13–60.0015%5 Oct →
nuke13–90.0621%5 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0213%4 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.029%4 Oct →
nuke13–70.0416%4 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0514%4 Oct →
cache2–13-0.087%3 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0726%3 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0421%1 Oct →
inferno13–30.024%1 Oct →
nuke13–60.1215%1 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0214%30 Sept →
dust213–00.0220%30 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0629%30 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0821%30 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.038%30 Sept →
cache13–60.0317%28 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0714%28 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0327%28 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.048%27 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0519%27 Sept →
ancient7–130.0114%27 Sept →
inferno4–130.0126%27 Sept →
nuke16–140.0119%26 Sept →
cache13–40.0124%26 Sept →
mirage13–50.0612%26 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0120%26 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0012%26 Sept →
cache13–70.0821%26 Sept →
inferno10–130.0416%26 Sept →
mirage13–40.0620%26 Sept →
ancient11–130.0018%24 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0519%23 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0218%22 Sept →
dust214–160.0521%21 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0217%21 Sept →
nuke13–100.0325%21 Sept →
ancient9–130.0525%21 Sept →
poseidon5–9-0.0316%20 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0132%17 Sept →
ancient13–110.0722%17 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0310%17 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0216%17 Sept →
nuke13–50.1222%17 Sept →
ancient13–70.0313%16 Sept →
cache8–130.0216%16 Sept →
anubis13–20.0614%15 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0311%15 Sept →
cache9–13-0.039%11 Sept →
inferno13–110.0314%11 Sept →
ancient7–130.0110%11 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0125%10 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.035%10 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.032%10 Sept →
mirage13–30.0614%10 Sept →
dust213–40.0610%10 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.102%10 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0012%9 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0419%9 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0817%6 Sept →
cache13–30.0413%6 Sept →
nuke13–50.0035%6 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.016%6 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0313%6 Sept →
inferno13–60.0224%5 Sept →
nuke13–80.0724%5 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0123%5 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0811%4 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0514%4 Sept →
dust23–13-0.096%4 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0020%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0623%3 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.026%3 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0224%2 Sept →
nuke15–150.0328%2 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0014%31 Aug →
ancient13–100.017%31 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0711%30 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.1017%30 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.039%28 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.046%28 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0613%26 Aug →
dust213–110.0113%26 Aug →
cache1–10-0.059%26 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0914%24 Aug →
nuke13–70.0120%24 Aug →
ancient9–130.0113%23 Aug →
mirage13–80.0816%23 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.