Crabber

Crabber — CS2 Stats

76561198026415064[U:1:66149336]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,564Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,252Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#66791 of 260020 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,615 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−190Premier CS Rating · 21,442 → 21,252

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,252 +3,329 3 Sept – 5 Nov · 36 days played
17,85521,442peak 21,4423 Sept5 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,615 +0 3 Sept – 20 Sept · 3 observations
1,6151,615peak 1,6153 Sept20 Sept
21,688Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,615Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,615
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 136 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 190 below peak (21,442)
  • +1,630 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,748 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCrabberFACEITLevel 7 · 1,615 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,252 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,615csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning69
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–52–5Last 10043%Win rateLLTLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.2
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels6.4
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.9
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels7.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time601ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 4–0 · cache, 4 Nov →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · cache, 4 Nov →
422msFastest reaction time · 14–16 · nuke, 3 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 22dust2Weakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2216–673%0.02
cacheD186–1233%-0.00
anubisB158–753%-0.01
mirageC135–838%-0.01
dust2D112–918%-0.02
infernoC114–736%-0.02
ancientD92–722%0.02
poseidon—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,142Matches
49%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
81.8ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient13946%1.0517.7
Nuke12664%1.0616.1
Anubis4643%1.0015.7
Dust24349%0.9213.4
Train3954%1.2918.9
Mirage3826%0.6812.2
Inferno2744%0.9716.3
Overpass2152%0.9616.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
588msReaction time
56.3%T opening success
65.5%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
9.32HE damage / grenade
8.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust22–13-0.0529%5 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0512%5 Nov →
inferno15–15-0.0312%5 Nov →
cache7–130.0113%4 Nov →
dust20–13-0.0725%4 Nov →
cache4–00.1950%4 Nov →
anubis16–140.0111%3 Nov →
nuke14–16-0.0318%3 Nov →
ancient13–90.0115%3 Nov →
cache8–130.0035%3 Nov →
cache15–15-0.0113%2 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0328%2 Nov →
ancient10–130.0217%1 Nov →
anubis13–80.059%1 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0232%1 Nov →
cache10–13-0.0311%1 Nov →
nuke13–80.0210%1 Nov →
nuke13–20.0119%1 Nov →
anubis13–110.0417%31 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0222%30 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0111%30 Oct →
dust27–130.0231%29 Oct →
inferno13–100.0110%28 Oct →
dust213–40.0214%28 Oct →
nuke13–50.0510%28 Oct →
anubis16–140.0414%28 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0010%26 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0528%26 Oct →
nuke13–10.096%26 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0716%25 Oct →
cache13–30.0023%25 Oct →
cache8–130.0114%25 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0524%25 Oct →
ancient11–130.0815%22 Oct →
cache13–80.0519%22 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0025%22 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0312%22 Oct →
anubis5–130.0123%21 Oct →
nuke16–120.0514%21 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0810%20 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0818%20 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0218%15 Oct →
inferno13–100.0015%14 Oct →
anubis8–130.0115%14 Oct →
nuke13–30.1316%14 Oct →
ancient13–40.049%14 Oct →
cache5–130.0026%12 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0513%12 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0810%12 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0719%11 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0618%11 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0120%10 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0519%10 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0518%8 Oct →
mirage8–20.0417%8 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0118%8 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0218%6 Oct →
nuke13–80.0526%5 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0520%5 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.069%5 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0310%5 Oct →
mirage13–60.0015%5 Oct →
nuke13–90.0621%5 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0213%4 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.029%4 Oct →
nuke13–70.0416%4 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0514%4 Oct →
cache2–13-0.087%3 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0726%3 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0421%1 Oct →
inferno13–30.024%1 Oct →
nuke13–60.1215%1 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0214%30 Sept →
dust213–00.0220%30 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0629%30 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0821%30 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.038%30 Sept →
cache13–60.0317%28 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0714%28 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0327%28 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.048%27 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0519%27 Sept →
ancient7–130.0114%27 Sept →
inferno4–130.0126%27 Sept →
nuke16–140.0119%26 Sept →
cache13–40.0124%26 Sept →
mirage13–50.0612%26 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0120%26 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0012%26 Sept →
cache13–70.0821%26 Sept →
inferno10–130.0416%26 Sept →
mirage13–40.0620%26 Sept →
ancient11–130.0018%24 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0519%23 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0218%22 Sept →
dust214–160.0521%21 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0217%21 Sept →
nuke13–100.0325%21 Sept →
ancient9–130.0525%21 Sept →
poseidon5–9-0.0316%20 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.