Ptx

Ptx — CS2 Stats

76561198031653508[U:1:71387780]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,280Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,154Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating25,327Top 10% of 210,367 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18558 of 257521 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,406 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,327 +1,128 26 Feb – 14 Oct · 41 days played
23,06926,498peak 26,49826 Feb14 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,406 +0 29 Aug – 24 Sept · 4 observations
1,4061,406peak 1,40629 Aug24 Sept
26,498Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,406Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-02-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,406
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 125 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,171 below peak (26,498)
  • -19 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,673 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches650−44
Win rate67%48%+19pp
K/D1.090.75+0.34
Headshot %32%43%−10pp

Measured 24 Sep 2026 → 26 Oct 2026; previous 29 Aug 2026 → 24 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate48.9%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy15.9%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.871.031.050.18 short
Match win rate42.3%45.2%45.7%3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPtxFACEITLevel 6 · 1,406 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER25,327 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,406csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning38
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateLWLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility4.5
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 15% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning3.8
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time607ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 20 Jul →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · anubis, 22 Aug →
414msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 17 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 79% over 14anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2011–955%-0.02
infernoS1411–379%-0.01
cacheB137–654%-0.02
ancientA138–562%-0.05
dust2D124–833%-0.03
mirageB115–645%-0.03
overpassC104–640%-0.04
anubisD61–517%-0.03
train—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

133,591Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
6,252Matches
42.3%Match win rate
48.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
12,196MVPs
4,303Hours (in match)
11,166Bombs planted
1,520Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,772
AWP12,166
FAMAS4,173
P2503,283
P903,129
AUG2,895

Lifetime map wins

14,968inferno
7,000dust2
6,405nuke
2,696vertigo
1,797train
588cbble
394office
195italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,650Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
64.0ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno7650%0.9112.5
Nuke4949%0.9713.0
Ancient4450%0.8312.4
Mirage3842%0.8712.6
Anubis3040%0.9212.2
Vertigo2748%0.7611.0
Dust22129%0.8411.9
Overpass1856%0.7912.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
598msReaction time
15.5%T opening success
45.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
11.95HE damage / grenade
2.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0214° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.8914 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0212%14 Oct →
nuke13–40.0317%11 Oct →
mirage2–5-0.110%4 Oct →
cache16–13-0.0011%26 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0524%20 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0615%9 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0111%4 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.1020%4 Sept →
cache13–90.0219%4 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0120%4 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0632%4 Sept →
cache1–2-0.030%4 Sept →
nuke10–8-0.0114%4 Sept →
inferno13–90.0214%4 Sept →
inferno13–90.026%4 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.0018%4 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0411%4 Sept →
mirage13–00.0314%30 Aug →
cache13–11-0.049%30 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0111%23 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0932%22 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0418%17 Aug →
dust212–120.0210%16 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0318%13 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0614%13 Aug →
dust213–9-0.046%11 Aug →
nuke13–1-0.0614%11 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0712%4 Aug →
cache13–80.0232%3 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0329%3 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0110%30 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0421%30 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.029%29 Jul →
anubis13–100.0213%29 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0514%29 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0812%29 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0723%28 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0328%28 Jul →
train12–12-0.0213%22 Jul →
inferno13–50.018%20 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.107%20 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.0113%20 Jul →
cache6–130.0224%20 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0324%20 Jul →
cache8–130.0125%20 Jul →
nuke13–30.1312%20 Jul →
overpass7–13-0.0814%5 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.047%5 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0721%5 Jul →
inferno13–50.0013%27 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0510%24 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0115%23 Jun →
overpass7–13-0.0219%23 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.017%18 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0116%12 Jun →
nuke9–4-0.0325%12 Jun →
dust20–13-0.1118%9 Jun →
overpass13–9-0.029%3 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0210%3 Jun →
dust213–70.0220%2 Jun →
nuke16–120.069%2 Jun →
inferno13–60.0110%31 May →
dust213–110.0611%26 May →
ancient17–19-0.0313%24 May →
dust29–13-0.0210%11 May →
overpass11–13-0.039%2 May →
nuke13–10-0.0513%2 May →
dust26–13-0.0610%26 Apr →
inferno16–14-0.0218%26 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0812%26 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.1010%19 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.0410%19 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.068%18 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.016%14 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0819%12 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0511%7 Apr →
ancient4–13-0.077%7 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0723%7 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.047%6 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.059%5 Apr →
inferno13–70.0415%4 Apr →
overpass13–5-0.0715%31 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0713%31 Mar →
overpass13–10-0.0211%30 Mar →
nuke13–60.024%30 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0412%22 Mar →
nuke13–60.0614%22 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0421%22 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0113%22 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.0520%21 Mar →
anubis14–16-0.0316%16 Mar →
overpass13–9-0.0014%16 Mar →
inferno13–8-0.016%15 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0714%8 Mar →
inferno16–13-0.0412%4 Mar →
anubis2–13-0.016%27 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.057%27 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0711%26 Feb →
dust26–13-0.0329%26 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0519%26 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.