Parum Simia

Parum Simia — CS2 Stats

DE76561198027832589[U:1:67566861]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

822Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,557Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,150Purple band · top ~19.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,150 +4,499 22 Sept – 27 Oct · 11 days played
12,65117,599peak 17,59922 Sept27 Oct
17,599Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,040Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-08-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 449 below peak (17,599)
  • +4,046 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,850 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate47.9%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy16.0%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.161.021.03above
Match win rate43.7%44.7%45.2%1.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGParum SimiaFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,150 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,040csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning56
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–48–6Last 10046%Win rateLLLLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · +100ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch5.2

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 69% on T to 26% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.6
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time531ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%−5.3%
first ⅓ avg 29.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 26 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · cache, 29 Aug →
352msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · nuke, 23 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L6Current streak
4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2715–1256%0.02
infernoA169–756%0.03
nukeC125–742%0.00
dust2D124–833%0.01
mirageC104–640%0.03
anubisD61–517%0.01
ancientA53–260%0.00
train—41–325%0.02
vertigo—43–175%0.06
overpass—31–233%0.04
rush_001—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

92,562Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
5,126Matches
43.7%Match win rate
47.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
16.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
16,614MVPs
1,752Hours (in match)
4,537Bombs planted
1,017Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,419
AWP5,507
P2501,673
SSG 081,660
UMP-451,591
Knife1,444

Lifetime map wins

5,106inferno
5,035dust2
2,101nuke
1,683cbble
1,310train
615vertigo
292office
177bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

86Matches
63%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
78.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno944%1.1315.6
Mirage838%1.0315.4
Dust2560%1.0815.2
Ancient367%0.9614.7
Nuke367%1.1716.3
Cache250%0.9316.5
Vertigo1100%2.2033.0
Anubis10%0.7616.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
545msReaction time
69.2%T opening success
26.2%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.04HE damage / grenade
9.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4913 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 26.2286% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0220%27 Oct →
nuke5–130.0333%27 Oct →
nuke14–160.0025%26 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0128%26 Oct →
nuke8–130.0530%26 Oct →
anubis13–160.0229%25 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0122%25 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0315%24 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0529%15 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0325%14 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0113%13 Oct →
mirage13–60.0815%13 Oct →
nuke13–100.0330%13 Oct →
inferno9–130.0126%11 Oct →
inferno13–60.1229%11 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0723%11 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0429%11 Oct →
overpass6–130.0419%11 Oct →
inferno13–30.1217%11 Oct →
cache13–20.0619%11 Oct →
anubis8–130.0325%11 Oct →
inferno13–30.0937%11 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0325%10 Oct →
mirage7–130.0235%10 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0117%10 Oct →
cache13–110.0126%10 Oct →
cache13–40.0528%10 Oct →
anubis13–50.0026%10 Oct →
cache16–120.1124%10 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0224%10 Oct →
train0–6-0.0925%10 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0418%9 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0529%9 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0117%9 Oct →
inferno9–130.0430%9 Oct →
rush_0017–8-0.0644%9 Oct →
ancient11–130.0119%6 Oct →
mirage13–90.0319%6 Oct →
overpass3–130.0529%6 Oct →
dust28–13-0.009%4 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.080%4 Oct →
nuke4–9-0.0126%4 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0332%1 Oct →
inferno13–10.1038%30 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0117%29 Sept →
inferno12–120.0223%29 Sept →
ancient4–130.0021%28 Sept →
nuke13–40.1416%28 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0521%27 Sept →
cache13–90.0728%27 Sept →
mirage3–130.0323%27 Sept →
cache13–20.1931%26 Sept →
dust212–120.0919%26 Sept →
mirage12–120.0320%26 Sept →
vertigo13–60.1032%26 Sept →
mirage13–90.1022%25 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0122%25 Sept →
dust29–130.0424%24 Sept →
cache9–130.0223%24 Sept →
mirage13–100.0720%24 Sept →
inferno13–80.0423%24 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0415%24 Sept →
cache11–130.0827%24 Sept →
vertigo5–130.0121%24 Sept →
cache16–140.0628%23 Sept →
train8–130.0227%23 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0113%23 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0922%23 Sept →
train13–70.1527%23 Sept →
cache12–120.0124%23 Sept →
dust25–130.0930%23 Sept →
ancient13–60.0415%22 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0823%21 Sept →
train12–120.0233%21 Sept →
cache10–130.0132%18 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0642%4 Sept →
overpass13–80.0422%4 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0440%3 Sept →
dust213–40.0630%2 Sept →
cache9–130.0350%29 Aug →
cache7–130.0124%29 Aug →
cache11–130.0733%25 Aug →
anubis10–130.0531%25 Aug →
cache13–70.0529%25 Aug →
dust213–40.0541%23 Aug →
vertigo13–90.1526%23 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0317%23 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0341%21 Aug →
inferno10–130.0223%21 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0242%21 Aug →
cache13–50.0229%21 Aug →
nuke4–9-0.1140%21 Aug →
inferno9–60.1438%20 Aug →
mirage4–130.0231%20 Aug →
inferno9–7-0.0832%19 Aug →
anubis14–160.0233%19 Aug →
inferno16–130.0227%19 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0120%16 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0221%13 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0517%9 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.