xcr4iZ

xcr4iZ — CS2 Stats

76561198017356328[U:1:57090600]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,426Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,460Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,791Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,791 -1,732 21 Jun – 13 Nov · 28 days played
17,63920,775peak 20,77521 Jun13 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,387 +0 4 Sept – 19 Sept · 4 observations
1,3871,387peak 1,3874 Sept19 Sept
21,160Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,387Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-06-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,984 below peak (20,775)
  • -533 over 30 days · declining
  • +680 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,209 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,631), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate48.7%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy9.2%12.0%12.4%3.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.021.030.10 short
Match win rate41.0%44.7%45.2%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxcr4iZFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,791 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,387csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning61
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateLLWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility6.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 62% on T to 45% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning6.1
Utility6.1
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time604ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 24 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · dust2, 3 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 11 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 3 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 14infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2613–1350%-0.02
ancientB2312–1152%-0.02
nukeS1410–471%0.00
dust2B126–650%-0.03
cacheD93–633%-0.05
anubisC83–538%-0.00
infernoD61–517%-0.02
vertigo—21–150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,412Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
3,978Matches
41.0%Match win rate
48.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
9.2%Shot accuracy
7,556MVPs
1,567Hours (in match)
3,063Bombs planted
891Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,487
AWP6,160
FAMAS2,803
P901,633
P2501,501

Lifetime map wins

6,275nuke
6,037dust2
2,333inferno
946train
827vertigo
193cbble
147office
66lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

218Matches
50%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
75.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4538%0.8812.2
Ancient3759%0.9615.3
Anubis3462%0.9914.5
Nuke3465%1.0914.9
Dust21942%1.0315.0
Vertigo944%0.8712.8
Inferno714%0.8113.4
Overpass333%0.7411.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
28.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
69.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
597msReaction time
62.2%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
11.51HE damage / grenade
7.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–130.007%13 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0812%11 Nov →
inferno13–8-0.0221%11 Nov →
ancient13–11-0.0119%11 Nov →
mirage13–6-0.0221%10 Nov →
ancient13–70.0517%10 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0611%9 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0216%9 Nov →
anubis8–130.0326%9 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0710%2 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.0413%2 Nov →
ancient14–16-0.0315%26 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0613%22 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0111%22 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0016%22 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0219%22 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0332%21 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0113%21 Oct →
nuke13–50.0117%21 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0518%18 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0527%18 Oct →
nuke13–40.0228%18 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0113%16 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0317%16 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0411%16 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0412%15 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0812%15 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0814%15 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0117%15 Oct →
mirage13–60.0319%15 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0016%24 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0511%24 Sept →
ancient11–130.0113%21 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0211%18 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0220%18 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0015%18 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0214%18 Sept →
ancient13–70.0314%14 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0919%26 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0422%26 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0328%26 Aug →
mirage13–110.0114%26 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0729%26 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0718%25 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0110%25 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.037%21 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0210%21 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0416%21 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.044%20 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0226%20 Aug →
cache10–13-0.084%20 Aug →
nuke13–80.0616%18 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0021%17 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0719%17 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0713%7 Aug →
vertigo13–11-0.0310%7 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.024%7 Aug →
mirage12–120.0228%29 Jul →
cache13–16-0.0416%24 Jul →
mirage13–110.0119%24 Jul →
nuke13–20.1117%24 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.066%23 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0617%21 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0315%21 Jul →
dust216–12-0.0117%21 Jul →
ancient13–100.079%21 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0019%21 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0214%21 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0431%16 Jul →
mirage13–100.0115%16 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0018%16 Jul →
nuke5–130.0423%16 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0222%16 Jul →
ancient16–12-0.0518%15 Jul →
anubis13–1-0.0112%13 Jul →
mirage11–130.0314%13 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0213%13 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0317%13 Jul →
inferno10–130.0123%13 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0817%12 Jul →
ancient13–80.0524%12 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0612%12 Jul →
cache16–12-0.0123%12 Jul →
dust213–80.008%12 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0317%12 Jul →
nuke13–100.0217%12 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0115%11 Jul →
nuke13–70.0224%11 Jul →
anubis4–130.0119%11 Jul →
anubis13–40.0424%11 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0611%10 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0417%10 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0417%10 Jul →
dust213–70.0118%3 Jul →
dust213–0-0.0150%3 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0317%3 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0836%3 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0116%21 Jun →
mirage13–90.0112%21 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0514%21 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.