nauo

nauo — CS2 Stats

76561198016226021[U:1:55960293]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,010Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
606Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,114 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Nov 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,010 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

22,670Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,114Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-04-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,114
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 87 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-11-09
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-11-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Nov 2026 and 14 Nov 2026.

Measured 9 Nov 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate44.1%46.8%48.2%4.1% short
Shot accuracy6.1%13.0%13.2%7.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.011.061.070.06 short
Match win rate46.2%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnauoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,114 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,114csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning50
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–42Last 10058%Win rateLWWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 439ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 465ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 452ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.3
Utility5.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.0
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time455ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 514ms → last ⅓ avg 455ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–3 · eldorado, 9 Aug →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · vertigo, 15 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · dust2, 8 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 25 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 17dust2Weakest map · 51% over 41
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B4121–2051%-0.00
mirageS1711–665%-0.01
anubisA159–660%-0.00
infernoB158–753%-0.03
vertigo—33–0100%0.05
nuke—21–150%-0.03
cache—22–0100%-0.00
poseidon—20–20%-0.06
eldorado—11–0100%0.16
debris—11–0100%0.05
ancient—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (51% over 41). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,419Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
1,495Matches
46.2%Match win rate
44.1%Headshot %
6.1%Shot accuracy
2,888MVPs
606Hours (in match)
1,527Bombs planted
340Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,765dust2
1,892inferno
1,435nuke
919vertigo
193train
74assault
20cbble
6militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

182Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
78.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26957%1.0916.0
Mirage3956%1.0215.8
Anubis3043%1.0015.4
Inferno2050%0.8713.3
Ancient1050%1.0917.1
Vertigo862%1.1717.1
Overpass333%0.8914.0
Cache250%1.0620.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
7.0°Preaim
458msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
10.18HE damage / grenade
3.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.7614 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6274% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0919%5 Oct →
anubis13–70.0625%8 Sept →
dust213–90.019%8 Sept →
anubis7–130.0112%8 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0522%7 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0221%7 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.049%7 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0414%7 Sept →
dust213–70.0314%7 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0623%7 Sept →
anubis13–70.0817%6 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0225%6 Sept →
dust213–80.0124%6 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0313%6 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0317%6 Sept →
vertigo16–12-0.0221%5 Sept →
dust210–130.0612%5 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0721%3 Sept →
dust27–130.0117%2 Sept →
mirage17–19-0.0613%2 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0223%2 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0612%1 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0516%1 Sept →
dust213–90.0416%1 Sept →
dust26–13-0.089%1 Sept →
dust213–10-0.038%30 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0716%30 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0712%30 Aug →
inferno13–70.0514%26 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0414%26 Aug →
dust211–130.0120%23 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0319%17 Aug →
vertigo13–110.1029%15 Aug →
cache13–50.0319%15 Aug →
anubis13–90.0116%15 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0516%14 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0714%14 Aug →
inferno13–80.0010%14 Aug →
dust213–50.0114%12 Aug →
mirage13–80.0517%12 Aug →
mirage13–70.0110%12 Aug →
anubis9–130.0215%12 Aug →
mirage13–80.1018%12 Aug →
mirage13–110.0410%11 Aug →
dust27–130.0111%11 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0019%10 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0918%10 Aug →
dust213–50.0215%10 Aug →
inferno13–80.0112%10 Aug →
dust213–50.1010%9 Aug →
eldorado9–30.1613%9 Aug →
poseidon1–9-0.0316%9 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0414%8 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0316%8 Aug →
anubis16–12-0.0317%8 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.178%8 Aug →
poseidon6–9-0.0922%8 Aug →
inferno9–60.0821%8 Aug →
debris9–20.0522%8 Aug →
vertigo9–20.0811%8 Aug →
nuke9–4-0.018%8 Aug →
dust213–10-0.048%2 Aug →
dust211–130.0123%2 Aug →
dust27–130.0914%31 Jul →
dust213–50.0413%31 Jul →
dust212–16-0.0210%7 May →
mirage6–13-0.0323%7 May →
dust225–23-0.0015%6 May →
dust213–110.0023%6 May →
dust29–13-0.0325%5 May →
inferno9–13-0.027%5 May →
mirage8–130.0117%3 May →
inferno16–130.0413%29 Apr →
ancient13–80.024%29 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0226%27 Apr →
dust213–50.0526%26 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0322%26 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0126%26 Apr →
anubis16–14-0.0111%25 Apr →
dust213–10.0513%25 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0622%25 Apr →
dust213–8-0.0224%22 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.008%22 Apr →
dust213–16-0.0224%20 Apr →
mirage16–12-0.0214%20 Apr →
anubis3–13-0.0414%18 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.0321%17 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0212%17 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0920%17 Apr →
dust210–130.0112%16 Apr →
dust213–50.0318%16 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.056%16 Apr →
anubis13–6-0.0011%15 Apr →
dust213–110.0315%14 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0013%14 Apr →
anubis13–100.0118%14 Apr →
dust213–80.0422%13 Apr →
anubis11–130.0016%12 Apr →
mirage16–140.0014%12 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0122%12 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.