#### — CS2 Stats

BA76561198005462692[U:1:45196964]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,095Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,734Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating21,661Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#56567 of 240310 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,373 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,373 → 2,373

+53Tracked matches · now 2,095

−13.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 43.3%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 16 days played since 17 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,373 +0 10 Sept – 12 Sept · 2 observations

21,661Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,373Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

16Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,373
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 127 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-09-10
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 21,661
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,339 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	75	—	—
Win rate	60%	—	—
K/D	1.02	—	—
Headshot %	41%	—	—

Measured 28 Aug 2026 → 23 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=28,192), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	39.3%	51.0%
Shot accuracy	11.8%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.08	1.09
Match win rate	49.0%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning61

Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–46Last 10054%Win rateLLWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 476ms

Last 20

9–11 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 486ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.2

Utility3.0

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels4.1

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning6.1

Utility3.0

Mechanics5.6

Opening Duels4.3

Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time471ms−12ms

first ⅓ avg 483ms → last ⅓ avg 471ms

Headshot accuracy14.2%−0.9%

first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 19 Aug →

36%Best headshot accuracy · 2–10 · anubis, 19 Sept →

313msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 17 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · mirage, 21 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

8–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 21mirageWeakest map · 42% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	S	21	14–7	67%	0.01
cache	S	17	11–6	65%	0.04
inferno	C	16	7–9	44%	0.02
anubis	B	13	7–6	54%	0.00
nuke	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
mirage	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.02
dust2	C	9	4–5	44%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

128,670Lifetime kills

1.08K/D

4,559Matches

49.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

39.3%Headshot %

11.8%Shot accuracy

11,901MVPs

2,734Hours (in match)

6,476Bombs planted

1,577Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,191

AWP23,367

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,488

P2000 / USP-S6,678

Glock-184,753

P2504,365

Desert Eagle2,816

MAC-102,742

Tec-92,571

Knife2,437

Lifetime map wins

10,498inferno

6,727dust2

4,689nuke

3,743train

1,776cbble

1,246vertigo

215office

208aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,563Matches

53%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

81.1ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	191	54%	1.16	16.1
Inferno	188	47%	1.27	16.3
Dust2	171	56%	1.13	15.7
Mirage	156	46%	1.03	14.8
Nuke	152	56%	1.30	17.1
Anubis	137	46%	1.13	16.8
Overpass	69	57%	1.42	17.6
Cache	59	68%	1.34	17.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy

37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.2%Spray accuracy

75.3%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

474msReaction time

38.6%T opening success

55.8%CT opening success

0.40Enemies flashed / flash

1.7%Flash assists

5.33HE damage / grenade

2.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.0891% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3972 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.5845% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	11–13	0.00	8%	23 Sept →
nuke	9–13	0.01	19%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	9%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–16	-0.05	15%	23 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	20%	23 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.02	29%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.03	19%	23 Sept →
ancient	16–13	-0.00	15%	23 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.04	14%	23 Sept →
ancient	11–13	0.01	6%	23 Sept →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	12%	21 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.02	12%	21 Sept →
ancient	11–13	0.00	9%	21 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	12%	21 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	10%	21 Sept →
mirage	13–1	0.00	10%	21 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.08	13%	21 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.09	11%	21 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.07	12%	20 Sept →
mirage	2–13	0.01	14%	20 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.00	9%	20 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.01	12%	20 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.00	10%	20 Sept →
nuke	13–16	0.00	20%	20 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.02	21%	19 Sept →
anubis	2–10	-0.10	36%	19 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.02	10%	19 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.10	18%	19 Sept →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	10%	19 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.04	15%	18 Sept →
cache	13–10	0.01	16%	18 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	9%	18 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.05	13%	18 Sept →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	12%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.02	13%	17 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.02	6%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.07	10%	17 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	9%	17 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.07	28%	17 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	4%	17 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.08	8%	17 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.06	16%	17 Sept →
nuke	13–3	0.03	8%	17 Sept →
nuke	7–13	0.00	13%	13 Sept →
inferno	13–8	0.02	14%	13 Sept →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	11%	13 Sept →
ancient	13–5	0.09	17%	13 Sept →
inferno	1–13	0.05	17%	13 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.01	19%	13 Sept →
nuke	13–6	0.07	15%	13 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.03	18%	12 Sept →
anubis	13–10	0.01	9%	12 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.12	18%	12 Sept →
cache	28–24	0.05	19%	12 Sept →
ancient	13–2	0.14	11%	12 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.01	15%	12 Sept →
cache	4–13	0.02	15%	12 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.01	16%	12 Sept →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	7%	12 Sept →
mirage	3–13	0.02	10%	12 Sept →
ancient	13–4	0.04	15%	12 Sept →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	11%	12 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.06	29%	11 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.05	15%	11 Sept →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	17%	11 Sept →
mirage	17–19	0.01	11%	11 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.02	16%	11 Sept →
nuke	19–15	0.07	17%	2 Sept →
cache	13–3	0.03	17%	2 Sept →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	12%	2 Sept →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	6%	2 Sept →
nuke	13–5	-0.00	12%	2 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.07	13%	1 Sept →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	7%	1 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.01	19%	1 Sept →
inferno	13–2	0.01	14%	1 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.02	13%	1 Sept →
ancient	13–8	-0.07	8%	1 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.06	7%	27 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	16%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.05	16%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	19%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	18%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.06	0%	19 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.01	20%	19 Aug →
cache	13–16	0.01	20%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.09	27%	19 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.16	29%	19 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	18%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.07	21%	19 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	18%	18 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	12%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.03	15%	18 Aug →
anubis	19–17	-0.05	10%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	14%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	16%	18 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	11%	18 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.05	20%	18 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.01	11%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.05	21%	17 Aug →