Tampon Collector (Used)

Tampon Collector (Used) — CS2 Stats

AU76561198004162898[U:1:43897170]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,310Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,889Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,112 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,310 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 64 days played since 8 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,847 +1,813 8 Dec6 Jun · 33 days played
17,16323,495peak 23,4958 Dec6 Jun
23,531Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,112Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
64Days played since 2025-12-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,112
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 89 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-11
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 11 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 11 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate39.8%43.8%44.9%5.1% short
Shot accuracy22.1%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.191.021.04above
Match win rate34.4%44.7%45.3%10.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTampon Collector (Used)FACEITLevel 5 · 1,112 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,112csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning46
Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55378Last 10055%Win rateLWLWWWTTLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 433 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 1154 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility1.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch7.4

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.6
Utility1.9
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time547ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 13 May
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 25 Mar
422msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · dust2, 23 Feb
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 10 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
136In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B42222052%0.01
mirageD124833%-0.03
ancientS118373%-0.01
nukeA74357%0.00
anubisB63350%0.00
cacheB63350%-0.02
infernoS64267%-0.01
office31233%-0.01
overpass21150%-0.04
train220100%0.02
warden110100%0.05
italy110100%0.08
vertigo110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

134,055Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
6,140Matches
34.4%Match win rate
39.8%Headshot %
22.1%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 5 players
13,725MVPs
1,889Hours (in match)
2,172Bombs planted
923Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP28,570
AK-4718,221
SSG 0812,730
MP94,992
MAC-104,715
P2502,698

Lifetime map wins

21,505dust2
3,079inferno
1,296nuke
1,122vertigo
438train
107office
53lake
36italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

55Matches
58%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
87.4ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

57%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21292%1.1617.2
Inferno956%0.8315.3
Ancient944%0.9216.6
Mirage650%0.8315.2
Anubis450%0.9216.5
Vertigo10%1.0617.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
546msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
42.1%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
1.5%Flash assists
11.85HE damage / grenade
1.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2441% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3275 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6231% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.0815%29 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0315%29 Aug
dust27–13-0.046%24 Jul
dust213–70.0322%22 Jul
anubis13–90.0719%22 Jul
dust213–110.0213%17 Jul
dust212–120.0514%16 Jul
anubis12–120.0112%15 Jul
office5–130.0324%28 Jun
dust212–120.0319%28 Jun
dust213–110.0230%19 Jun
warden13–110.0520%19 Jun
dust213–60.0519%19 Jun
mirage13–16-0.059%6 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0214%6 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0513%4 Jun
overpass4–13-0.057%3 Jun
dust213–60.1118%13 May
office12–12-0.026%13 May
cache13–11-0.0311%13 May
cache13–2-0.0216%13 May
ancient3–13-0.069%11 May
cache5–13-0.036%10 May
cache11–130.0014%10 May
dust213–10.1017%10 May
dust213–11-0.049%9 May
cache6–13-0.0410%6 May
cache13–50.0113%30 Apr
nuke9–130.0015%26 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0411%24 Apr
inferno13–100.0013%23 Apr
dust22–130.0028%22 Apr
dust213–100.0416%22 Apr
mirage16–120.0312%22 Apr
nuke13–60.056%18 Apr
dust26–13-0.055%18 Apr
italy13–60.086%13 Apr
vertigo13–90.0111%13 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0417%9 Apr
dust213–10-0.037%8 Apr
dust211–13-0.0320%7 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0011%4 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0522%4 Apr
dust211–130.0010%29 Mar
nuke13–90.0215%29 Mar
dust216–120.0214%27 Mar
train13–40.0420%26 Mar
dust213–10.0734%25 Mar
dust28–13-0.036%23 Mar
dust24–13-0.089%19 Mar
dust29–13-0.089%18 Mar
dust27–13-0.0615%16 Mar
dust26–13-0.0213%16 Mar
nuke9–130.0210%14 Mar
dust213–70.0713%14 Mar
ancient13–110.0112%3 Mar
dust213–110.0316%2 Mar
dust213–7-0.048%1 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0714%27 Feb
dust212–16-0.0111%27 Feb
dust213–90.0514%24 Feb
dust213–50.0212%23 Feb
ancient13–3-0.0012%23 Feb
dust213–80.0413%22 Feb
ancient13–6-0.008%22 Feb
dust213–100.0113%22 Feb
mirage11–130.028%21 Feb
dust213–100.0711%21 Feb
inferno13–50.0511%20 Feb
dust210–130.0425%20 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0514%20 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0110%19 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0112%19 Feb
ancient16–140.0317%18 Feb
dust213–20.0817%14 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0118%5 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0217%29 Jan
inferno13–10-0.0514%29 Jan
ancient13–110.0511%28 Jan
anubis6–13-0.0421%28 Jan
dust27–13-0.0414%26 Jan
ancient13–2-0.005%25 Jan
anubis13–40.0113%24 Jan
dust213–70.0620%6 Jan
mirage13–40.0110%6 Jan
dust214–16-0.019%5 Jan
inferno13–4-0.0311%5 Jan
overpass13–5-0.0312%5 Jan
ancient16–14-0.0111%1 Jan
train13–80.0115%1 Jan
dust213–9-0.0412%29 Dec
office13–7-0.0417%29 Dec
dust28–13-0.0315%28 Dec
mirage8–11-0.0217%26 Dec
dust212–12-0.0610%18 Dec
dust24–13-0.0516%17 Dec
nuke13–50.0012%17 Dec
nuke12–12-0.0414%11 Dec
dust25–13-0.0212%11 Dec
mirage2–13-0.0524%8 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →