swagosexual

swagosexual — CS2 Stats

SY76561197998778398[U:1:38512670]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

503Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
791Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,957Blue band · top ~33.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 503 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 15 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,957 +232 23 Apr17 Sept · 13 days played
13,72514,999peak 14,99923 Apr17 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-04-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,042 below peak (14,999)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,043 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate43.5%43.8%44.9%1.4% short
Shot accuracy16.0%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.101.021.04above
Match win rate41.9%44.7%45.3%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGswagosexualFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,957 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning50
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46513Last 10046%Win rateLLLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · +47ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 690ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility3.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch1.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning5.0
Utility3.0
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time663ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 663ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 24 Apr
41%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 30 May
453msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · anubis, 27 Apr
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 1 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2191243%-0.01
mirageD1861233%-0.04
cacheB178947%-0.01
nukeB126650%-0.03
infernoA116555%0.00
ancientS75271%-0.00
anubisB63350%-0.02
overpassC52340%0.01
office2020%-0.05
train110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,204Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
1,774Matches
41.9%Match win rate
43.5%Headshot %
16.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
3,818MVPs
791Hours (in match)
2,012Bombs planted
343Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,051dust2
2,931inferno
1,786nuke
646train
433cbble
248vertigo
112office
81assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

134Matches
52%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
76.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23355%0.9015.3
Inferno2450%0.8815.4
Anubis1856%0.8113.8
Ancient1656%1.0216.1
Nuke1354%0.9815.3
Mirage1050%0.9215.9
Cache667%1.0215.8
Train333%0.8918.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
74.1%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
657msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
41.6%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
4.51HE damage / grenade
4.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5677% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.084%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0016%4 Jul
mirage1–13-0.090%22 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0519%18 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0511%18 Jun
dust213–10-0.0114%31 May
dust27–13-0.0023%30 May
mirage0–13-0.0841%30 May
nuke14–16-0.0514%29 May
dust213–20.0224%29 May
inferno13–8-0.0214%27 May
anubis11–130.0117%27 May
ancient13–110.0115%25 May
dust29–13-0.0519%25 May
overpass11–130.0218%23 May
nuke10–13-0.0816%20 May
inferno13–80.0116%19 May
dust28–13-0.0219%19 May
cache13–90.0310%18 May
cache13–100.0417%16 May
nuke13–80.008%15 May
dust211–130.0219%15 May
ancient13–100.0415%15 May
cache11–13-0.039%15 May
nuke4–13-0.065%13 May
cache13–5-0.0416%13 May
dust213–60.0115%12 May
ancient13–60.0624%12 May
office9–13-0.0527%10 May
overpass16–140.0414%9 May
cache9–13-0.0321%9 May
mirage12–12-0.0210%8 May
cache13–10-0.0218%6 May
cache9–13-0.0117%6 May
mirage13–6-0.0120%3 May
cache7–13-0.0123%3 May
ancient7–13-0.0411%2 May
anubis13–5-0.0316%2 May
cache11–13-0.038%2 May
cache13–100.059%2 May
cache13–40.0314%2 May
cache13–8-0.0012%1 May
inferno7–13-0.0320%1 May
nuke13–10.0123%1 May
overpass7–13-0.0618%1 May
cache1–13-0.0815%30 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0313%29 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0710%29 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0116%29 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0414%29 Apr
cache13–90.0017%29 Apr
cache10–13-0.0217%29 Apr
cache10–13-0.0418%29 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0216%27 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0118%27 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0218%27 Apr
train13–80.0923%26 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0513%26 Apr
dust24–13-0.0619%26 Apr
dust214–16-0.0521%25 Apr
dust217–19-0.0214%25 Apr
inferno13–160.008%25 Apr
mirage7–13-0.053%25 Apr
inferno16–14-0.0115%25 Apr
cache9–130.0620%25 Apr
mirage13–110.0013%25 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0413%25 Apr
mirage10–13-0.018%24 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0416%24 Apr
dust22–13-0.105%24 Apr
overpass13–70.0637%24 Apr
ancient13–60.043%24 Apr
nuke13–100.0819%24 Apr
inferno9–40.1427%24 Apr
dust210–13-0.0312%24 Apr
inferno13–100.0125%23 Apr
dust213–90.0129%23 Apr
inferno13–40.0114%23 Apr
inferno8–80.0218%20 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0813%20 Apr
dust213–90.049%18 Apr
dust213–10-0.0219%18 Apr
dust213–11-0.0417%18 Apr
dust28–130.0017%18 Apr
nuke8–130.0028%18 Apr
dust213–100.0223%17 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0416%17 Apr
dust213–110.0415%16 Apr
nuke13–70.0213%16 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0411%16 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0521%16 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0431%16 Apr
office12–12-0.0421%15 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0622%15 Apr
dust26–130.0413%15 Apr
dust27–13-0.1312%15 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0822%15 Apr
mirage6–13-0.1023%15 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0617%15 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0626%15 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →