KoK

KoK — CS2 Stats

76561197998643609[U:1:38377881]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,664Tracked matches33%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,448Hours in CS44Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,651Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#55172 of 231404 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 27 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,651 -1,815 30 Jun19 Sept · 25 days played
21,65125,731peak 25,73130 Jun19 Sept
25,731Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-06-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,080 below peak (25,731)
  • -1,640 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,815 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,349 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.5%48.3%51.0%5.5% short
Shot accuracy9.1%13.2%13.7%4.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.071.090.12 short
Match win rate48.2%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKoKFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,651 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning61
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48502Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.1
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time546ms−102ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 24 Jul
44%Best headshot accuracy · 10–7 · mirage, 1 Aug
344msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 19 Sept
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 30 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 20dust2Weakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2016480%0.01
infernoA1810856%0.01
ancientC1771041%-0.01
cacheB136746%-0.00
anubisD134931%-0.01
dust2D91811%-0.02
mirageD72529%-0.03
vertigo110100%-0.03
boulder1010%-0.01
overpass110100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,450Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
4,651Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
45.5%Headshot %
9.1%Shot accuracy
11,659MVPs
2,107Hours (in match)
7,183Bombs planted
1,149Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,331
AWP10,144
P2502,196
MAC-101,782
Tec-91,497

Lifetime map wins

8,433inferno
6,881nuke
6,241dust2
1,963train
1,422vertigo
490cbble
367office
92lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

279Matches
55%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
74.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4562%0.8714.4
Nuke4358%0.9114.4
Anubis3850%0.8914.9
Dust23253%0.9815.1
Inferno2850%0.9413.0
Mirage1850%0.9416.2
Overpass956%0.8212.3
Cache862%1.0816.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
528msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
53.0%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
12.03HE damage / grenade
3.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.472 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2622% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust22–13-0.060%19 Sept
vertigo13–11-0.0320%17 Sept
cache0–13-0.0440%14 Sept
inferno13–90.0418%14 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0531%13 Sept
dust211–130.0122%13 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0321%12 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0424%10 Sept
ancient13–30.0510%10 Sept
ancient4–130.0318%6 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0731%5 Sept
dust21–13-0.058%5 Sept
inferno13–90.1028%2 Sept
anubis10–130.0318%2 Sept
nuke13–80.1122%2 Sept
anubis13–160.0022%1 Sept
nuke9–130.0417%29 Aug
cache10–130.0418%27 Aug
anubis13–90.0024%26 Aug
nuke13–5-0.048%23 Aug
inferno13–30.0323%23 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0317%22 Aug
inferno11–130.0223%22 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0515%22 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0121%21 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0518%17 Aug
inferno0–13-0.0635%17 Aug
mirage4–6-0.058%16 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0515%16 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0822%15 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0512%15 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0217%15 Aug
cache9–13-0.0524%14 Aug
dust216–12-0.0414%13 Aug
dust27–13-0.0224%10 Aug
ancient13–60.0516%10 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0324%10 Aug
nuke13–100.0213%9 Aug
nuke13–100.0022%9 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0317%9 Aug
cache13–50.0320%9 Aug
nuke13–6-0.029%9 Aug
inferno13–60.0311%9 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0229%9 Aug
cache11–130.0222%9 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0520%8 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0217%8 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0121%8 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0225%8 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0112%7 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0522%4 Aug
cache0–13-0.060%4 Aug
anubis15–150.0114%4 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0616%4 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0039%3 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0216%2 Aug
nuke13–110.0013%2 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0014%2 Aug
nuke13–60.1113%2 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0712%2 Aug
ancient13–80.0118%2 Aug
nuke13–40.0424%2 Aug
dust28–13-0.0320%2 Aug
ancient13–70.0139%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.048%1 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0418%1 Aug
ancient13–60.0620%1 Aug
mirage5–13-0.019%1 Aug
cache13–100.0024%1 Aug
mirage10–7-0.0144%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.0027%1 Aug
mirage16–140.0215%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.056%1 Aug
anubis15–150.0111%31 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0914%31 Jul
inferno13–70.0326%31 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0116%27 Jul
cache16–12-0.0121%27 Jul
nuke13–20.0112%27 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0119%26 Jul
anubis13–80.0412%26 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0214%26 Jul
cache16–14-0.0311%26 Jul
cache13–30.0416%26 Jul
nuke13–50.0426%26 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0214%25 Jul
inferno13–40.1818%24 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0020%24 Jul
inferno13–6-0.008%24 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0619%23 Jul
boulder3–13-0.019%23 Jul
inferno10–130.0625%13 Jul
cache13–30.0820%13 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0114%12 Jul
dust211–13-0.0023%3 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0122%30 Jun
overpass13–10.1423%30 Jun
cache10–13-0.0315%28 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0518%28 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0227%27 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →