RANTSI

RANTSI — CS2 Stats

76561197998602174[U:1:38336446]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,480Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,568Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#44461 of 231418 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,690 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 22,568 → 22,568
0Faceit ELO · 2,690 → 2,690
+10Tracked matches · now 1,480
−3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 61 days played since 23 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,568 -6,424 23 Nov10 Sept · 19 days played
22,56829,868peak 29,86823 Nov10 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,690 +0 30 Aug10 Sept · 4 observations
2,6902,690peak 2,69030 Aug10 Sept
29,868Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,690Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2025-11-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,690
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 310 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,300 below peak (29,868)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,432 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRANTSIFACEITLevel 10 · 2,690 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,568 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,690csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning65
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY63361Last 10063%Win rateLWLWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · −51ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.4
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time540ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 1 Aug
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · nuke, 9 Dec
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 16 Sept
13–1Biggest win · cache, 12 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 6dust2Weakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB23121152%0.02
anubisB158753%0.00
cacheS1412286%0.05
infernoA138562%0.00
mirageS107370%0.02
dust2C94544%0.03
ancientA85363%0.02
overpassS660100%0.03
vertigo1010%-0.02
train110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,137Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
78.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke13257%1.1316.4
Anubis9653%1.0315.8
Inferno8660%1.2215.3
Dust28146%1.0214.5
Mirage6754%1.1215.7
Ancient5349%1.0214.3
Overpass4050%0.9814.8
Train2868%1.0716.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
531msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
58.2%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
9.20HE damage / grenade
8.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6253% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.0321%16 Sept
nuke25–22-0.0313%15 Sept
cache11–13-0.0314%15 Sept
anubis13–70.018%12 Sept
nuke16–130.0419%12 Sept
anubis20–22-0.0619%11 Sept
cache4–13-0.0318%8 Sept
anubis13–9-0.028%4 Sept
anubis11–13-0.037%4 Sept
nuke19–220.0716%3 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0822%2 Sept
mirage13–110.0518%1 Sept
mirage13–40.1121%30 Aug
ancient13–60.0316%30 Aug
dust29–13-0.0424%29 Aug
inferno14–160.0310%25 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0412%25 Aug
anubis9–13-0.049%23 Aug
cache13–70.0517%23 Aug
nuke13–50.0623%23 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0222%20 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0520%17 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0221%14 Aug
dust213–110.0113%14 Aug
cache13–80.0222%13 Aug
cache13–10.0920%12 Aug
anubis17–190.0218%11 Aug
dust213–80.1923%1 Aug
cache13–30.1316%28 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0916%17 Jul
anubis16–14-0.1013%9 Jul
inferno13–10.1212%9 Jul
nuke6–130.0213%9 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0330%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0313%8 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0011%8 Jul
ancient13–80.1118%7 Jul
nuke13–60.0416%6 Jul
anubis13–110.0816%6 Jul
cache13–80.0926%6 Jul
dust27–130.0520%24 Jun
overpass13–30.0719%5 Jun
nuke8–13-0.1020%4 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0222%4 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0119%3 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0310%29 May
nuke9–130.0221%29 May
nuke8–13-0.0316%28 May
cache13–40.1123%28 May
ancient13–100.0010%23 May
nuke13–11-0.0024%23 May
ancient13–8-0.0414%20 May
cache13–1-0.0131%19 May
cache13–40.1116%19 May
cache13–10-0.0120%8 May
cache13–90.1028%8 May
cache13–80.0517%7 May
inferno8–13-0.0422%7 May
cache13–7-0.006%4 May
nuke13–60.0124%28 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0217%22 Apr
anubis13–70.0713%16 Apr
mirage12–120.0416%14 Apr
anubis16–120.0519%7 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0016%7 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0525%7 Feb
inferno13–60.0419%6 Feb
overpass13–60.0624%6 Feb
inferno13–40.0320%5 Feb
nuke9–130.0512%4 Feb
anubis13–40.0816%4 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0315%4 Feb
dust210–130.0113%1 Feb
mirage13–90.0124%29 Jan
mirage13–110.0617%29 Jan
inferno13–6-0.0322%29 Jan
mirage13–70.0018%27 Jan
overpass16–13-0.0219%27 Jan
inferno16–13-0.0319%27 Jan
anubis5–13-0.0111%27 Jan
nuke13–60.0115%25 Jan
ancient13–50.0618%25 Jan
dust22–13-0.0123%23 Jan
anubis13–10.0716%23 Jan
nuke13–20.0331%23 Jan
dust213–8-0.0117%13 Dec
inferno13–90.0415%10 Dec
ancient14–160.0010%10 Dec
nuke13–60.1819%10 Dec
nuke10–130.0225%9 Dec
dust23–130.066%9 Dec
nuke13–30.1637%9 Dec
mirage13–80.0618%8 Dec
dust213–100.0533%6 Dec
mirage13–90.0111%5 Dec
overpass13–110.0111%3 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0220%28 Nov
ancient8–130.0227%26 Nov
train13–100.038%23 Nov
overpass13–110.0414%23 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →