devastor

devastor — CS2 Stats

FI76561197997848657[U:1:37582929]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,745Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,164Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,713 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Aug 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,713 → 1,713
+78Tracked matches · now 5,745
+30.0ppWin rate · 20.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 3 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

1,713Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-08-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,713
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 38 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate41.8%48.3%51.0%9.1% short
Shot accuracy14.7%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.131.071.09above
Match win rate38.6%46.9%48.4%9.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdevastorFACEITLevel 9 · 1,713 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,713csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning43
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT45541Last 10045%Win rateWWWLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · +55ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.4
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.3
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time529ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy13.0%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–6 · overpass, 5 Aug
37%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 19 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · anubis, 15 Aug
13–4Biggest win · cache, 12 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 61% over 18infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB25131252%-0.02
nukeA1811761%-0.02
dust2D1741324%-0.03
ancientC167944%-0.02
infernoD92722%-0.02
cacheC83538%-0.03
mirage32167%-0.03
overpass220100%0.12
office1010%-0.04
vertigo110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

268,872Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
11,096Matches
38.6%Match win rate
41.8%Headshot %
14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
21,057MVPs
5,930Hours (in match)
13,415Bombs planted
2,254Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47120,284
AWP9,967
MP97,509
AUG5,369
SG 5534,833

Lifetime map wins

18,031nuke
17,353inferno
8,470dust2
5,302train
4,668vertigo
765office
736lake
535cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,928Matches
51%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
70.0ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient44353%0.9214.0
Nuke36355%0.9113.2
Anubis35957%0.9814.5
Dust220736%0.8612.5
Inferno14343%0.8712.2
Mirage6745%0.8913.6
Overpass6450%0.8812.9
Train5050%0.8113.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
533msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
33.7%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
7.71HE damage / grenade
6.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.4541% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4686 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3076% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0217%18 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0113%17 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0018%16 Sept
nuke3–13-0.1019%15 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0112%14 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0411%14 Sept
anubis8–130.046%14 Sept
anubis16–12-0.0113%12 Sept
dust25–13-0.0212%12 Sept
cache13–40.0211%12 Sept
nuke13–9-0.077%11 Sept
dust28–13-0.0515%11 Sept
nuke8–130.0414%10 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0115%10 Sept
dust25–13-0.0515%10 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0222%10 Sept
ancient13–10-0.018%9 Sept
dust29–130.0116%9 Sept
anubis13–90.0614%9 Sept
anubis16–14-0.0421%7 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0821%7 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0716%7 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0013%7 Sept
cache2–13-0.085%7 Sept
dust213–80.015%6 Sept
anubis8–130.0120%6 Sept
dust22–13-0.020%6 Sept
nuke13–110.0117%3 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0812%3 Sept
office7–13-0.049%3 Sept
anubis13–90.0315%3 Sept
ancient13–7-0.056%3 Sept
anubis23–25-0.0412%2 Sept
cache3–13-0.0618%2 Sept
cache2–13-0.0511%2 Sept
ancient7–130.0110%2 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0210%2 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0214%2 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0511%1 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0517%1 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0313%1 Sept
dust24–130.0215%31 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0516%31 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0314%31 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0711%31 Aug
nuke13–7-0.024%30 Aug
ancient13–80.024%30 Aug
dust213–11-0.049%30 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0021%30 Aug
mirage13–70.0210%27 Aug
anubis5–13-0.065%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0419%25 Aug
ancient7–130.0211%24 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0617%23 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0418%23 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1015%22 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0013%21 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0714%21 Aug
nuke6–13-0.056%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0119%21 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0214%20 Aug
anubis13–10-0.035%20 Aug
ancient6–13-0.066%20 Aug
dust222–20-0.0313%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.0737%19 Aug
dust28–13-0.0626%17 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0610%17 Aug
cache13–9-0.0412%16 Aug
anubis7–13-0.076%16 Aug
dust29–13-0.0413%16 Aug
dust214–16-0.029%15 Aug
anubis13–70.0410%15 Aug
anubis13–90.0412%15 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0012%15 Aug
cache16–130.0513%13 Aug
anubis4–130.059%12 Aug
nuke8–130.078%12 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0711%10 Aug
inferno8–13-0.036%10 Aug
inferno0–2-0.0333%10 Aug
inferno13–11-0.038%9 Aug
ancient13–40.0711%8 Aug
ancient8–130.0315%8 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0113%8 Aug
inferno13–160.0117%8 Aug
cache10–13-0.045%8 Aug
nuke8–13-0.049%7 Aug
cache11–13-0.0714%7 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0413%7 Aug
anubis13–10-0.044%6 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0216%6 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0312%6 Aug
overpass9–60.1510%5 Aug
overpass9–40.082%5 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0313%5 Aug
vertigo13–70.0018%5 Aug
ancient13–110.0110%5 Aug
dust24–13-0.0523%5 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0415%4 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0810%3 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →