Señor Guzman

Señor Guzman — CS2 Stats

76561197997771605[U:1:37505877]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

588Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
694Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,672 +4,582 11 Nov – 2 Jul · 27 days played
13,09019,311peak 19,31111 Nov2 Jul
19,311Peak Premier in tracked matches
50Days played since 2025-11-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,962), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate43.0%42.7%43.8%meets
Shot accuracy13.9%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.970.991.020.05 short
Match win rate36.8%43.9%44.7%7.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSeñor GuzmanFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning52
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLLLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility6.1
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.2
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time608ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 21 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–4 · ancient, 17 Dec →
438msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 23 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 15 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2111–1052%0.00
nukeB2010–1050%0.00
dust2A169–756%0.02
cacheC125–742%0.02
infernoC94–544%-0.01
anubisD61–517%-0.03
mirageC52–340%-0.01
overpassA53–260%0.01
train—43–175%0.03
vertigo—10–10%-0.06
golden—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,324Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
2,419Matches
36.8%Match win rate
43.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
2,923MVPs
694Hours (in match)
735Bombs planted
368Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,165
AWP1,660
FAMAS1,531
MAC-101,171
MP91,035

Lifetime map wins

1,899inferno
1,842dust2
1,123nuke
513train
289vertigo
130cbble
40office
31ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
597msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
10.09HE damage / grenade
8.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5872% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–130.0219%23 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0715%23 Sept →
cache12–160.0520%1 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0112%1 Sept →
cache13–60.1318%21 Aug →
ancient13–90.0621%21 Aug →
nuke13–70.0814%21 Aug →
nuke11–1-0.0715%16 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0216%16 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0717%16 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0121%12 Aug →
mirage9–130.0212%12 Aug →
anubis13–160.0420%7 Aug →
dust213–100.0031%7 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0522%7 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0025%31 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0715%13 Jul →
nuke13–90.0215%13 Jul →
cache8–130.0316%8 Jul →
vertigo4–13-0.0617%8 Jul →
overpass6–13-0.0121%8 Jul →
nuke16–12-0.0112%2 Jul →
dust211–130.0623%2 Jul →
train4–1-0.0411%2 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.1021%30 Jun →
anubis4–13-0.1121%30 Jun →
cache13–80.0219%21 Jun →
cache13–40.0315%31 May →
cache9–130.0629%29 May →
ancient13–4-0.0315%28 May →
ancient10–13-0.0233%28 May →
dust213–7-0.029%28 May →
cache13–8-0.0219%19 May →
ancient13–50.0517%19 May →
cache13–30.0130%14 May →
ancient13–9-0.0127%14 May →
dust213–3-0.0117%14 May →
anubis16–14-0.0213%3 May →
cache6–13-0.0213%1 May →
cache12–120.0515%1 May →
ancient5–13-0.0413%26 Apr →
inferno13–60.0415%15 Apr →
ancient11–130.0520%15 Apr →
nuke9–130.028%12 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0113%12 Apr →
inferno13–100.0323%6 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0510%6 Apr →
ancient16–14-0.0122%31 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.019%31 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0513%31 Mar →
overpass6–13-0.0717%30 Mar →
ancient13–4-0.0411%25 Mar →
dust214–160.0529%22 Mar →
dust24–130.036%19 Mar →
dust24–130.0716%12 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0315%12 Mar →
nuke7–13-0.0118%4 Mar →
ancient8–130.1022%4 Mar →
mirage13–100.0113%23 Feb →
ancient2–130.0216%23 Feb →
ancient13–40.0217%23 Feb →
mirage2–13-0.086%23 Feb →
ancient13–90.039%17 Feb →
mirage13–100.0516%15 Feb →
dust213–10.0621%15 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0313%15 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0413%15 Feb →
nuke13–70.046%1 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0113%1 Feb →
nuke13–4-0.0211%31 Jan →
anubis11–13-0.0411%28 Jan →
nuke13–80.086%28 Jan →
ancient13–6-0.0110%19 Jan →
inferno9–120.0513%19 Jan →
nuke13–160.0114%2 Jan →
train13–70.0013%2 Jan →
dust211–130.0818%2 Jan →
ancient5–13-0.0214%30 Dec →
train13–30.0719%30 Dec →
ancient10–13-0.0111%30 Dec →
nuke9–10.1111%28 Dec →
nuke13–10-0.0013%28 Dec →
ancient13–50.0214%28 Dec →
nuke11–130.0114%27 Dec →
train10–130.086%21 Dec →
ancient3–4-0.0150%17 Dec →
dust213–70.0122%16 Dec →
nuke10–13-0.0218%16 Dec →
overpass13–20.097%16 Dec →
dust213–11-0.0314%4 Dec →
inferno9–13-0.0710%4 Dec →
dust213–70.0117%4 Dec →
nuke6–13-0.098%4 Dec →
inferno13–110.0219%30 Nov →
ancient10–130.0216%30 Nov →
golden12–120.0414%24 Nov →
nuke13–30.0317%23 Nov →
dust213–60.0114%17 Nov →
overpass13–5-0.0025%17 Nov →
overpass13–30.0218%11 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.